A note has been posted to
Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0 about this thread. It didn't mention any specific issues, so I'm not sure where the concern lies. I'll look in on this thread periodically and call attention to any
Forum Guidelines issues I happen to notice, like this one:
Curiously what I see is that he said your first
post sucked, not that
you sucked.
If I said that your third post was no better than your first post ... is that an
ad hominem?
The rationale for rule 10 (which needs better wording, but which at present says, "The sincerely held beliefs of other members deserve your respect. Please keep discussion civil. Argue the position, not the person.") is to prevent discussion from becoming personal. Once people become emotional or defensive or feel insulted then the quality of debate suffers.
In the opinion of this moderator there is not much difference between "Your argument sucks" and "You suck." Certainly the latter is more directly personal, but our opinions and arguments are direct extensions of ourselves, and
ad hominem attacks on them are felt very personally. They're also inconsistent with rule 4 requiring "evidence and reasoned argumentation."
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |