Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

taiji2's complaint

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   taiji2's complaint
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 85 (737307)
09-22-2014 9:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 18 by taiji2
09-21-2014 3:16 PM

Re: opening remark
When it comes to science, there are certain criteria for what evidence is. You have to explain WHY it is evidence, and how it fits into the model. One problem with the claims for evidence for Intelligent Design is that there is no mechanism to explain why something is evidence for Intelligent Design. it ends up being on big 'argument from ignorance' or 'argument from probability'.
​
The evidence has to be explain the model, and it has to be testable .. and explain WHY.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by taiji2, posted 09-21-2014 3:16 PM taiji2 has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024