If we discovered two planets both with exciting news - one with nothing but insects let's say, and the other with an advanced technological civilization sending to earth complex codes of information, to which world do you think we would give more research ?
Contra jar, I'd say that of course we'd be more interested in the planet with the technological civilisation, since of course we'd be more interested in things more like us. But this says nothing to your general point, the idea that we are 'more unique' than a hedgehog or salamander. You've explained the reasons that the old-fashioned evolutionary trees put humans at the top in your little anecdote - because humans write the history and humans drew the trees. We ascribe greater significance to the things that make us unique than to the things which make other species unique, because we're us.
As for this:
Most of us regard humans being on the top the scale. And every evolutionary sequence I ever saw from imaginative artists always have in the front of the line, or the top of the tree, to at the end of the supposed ascending scheme - you guessed it, a human being.
Aside from being just another example of people being interested in people, it's also becoming quite old fashioned. Below you can see a pictorial representation the evolutionary relationships of modern mammals. Humans aren't pictured, but our branch is in the lower far left, just about the picture of the anteater.