Catholicism versus Protestantism down the centuries

You know , a lot of people do a lot of lying about the Talmud. There are a number of passages in the Talmud about people named 'Jesus'. There were a lot of people named Jesus!Just because someone is named "Jesus" doesn't mean that it is talking about "Jesus of Nazareth"How about you quoting the relevant passage, including chapter , verse, and it could be looked at in context?It seems that is something that fundamentalists don't do. Look at passages in context that is.

Really?? Where did the Pharisee's say that?You do realize that the Jewish religion and culture does not have the concept of a 'bastard'. they have the concept of a mamzer, which is the products of one of the sexual relations that are forbidden.. but not a bastard. A mamzer would be considered toevah, and not allowed in the temple or synagoge, which, according to the gospels, he was allowed.Let's see if you can back up your claims with , you know, sources, to show you aren't making it up.Yes, some very anti-Semitic groups made claims about what is in the Talmud. .. but, a lot of that is either purely made up or taken out of context. ... actually, pretty damn all of it is.Let's see your sources. Let's see how reliiable they are, and just not folks spreading hate.Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.

Come now.. that isn't true you know. He read a book by a Jewish convert that was highly discredited and full of liesGosh, I think it is ARROGANT and obnoxious to think that another religions beliefs that are older than Christianity can be considered 'blasphemy'. I can see how a religion that split from an older religion could be considered blasphemous by the older religion, but the newer religion getting upset and proclaiming 'blasphemy'..

No, it wasn't. Luther's main works on the Jews were his 65,000-word treatise Von den Juden und Ihren Lgen (On the Jews and Their Lies) and Vom Schem Hamphoras und vom Geschlecht Christi (Of the Unknowable Name and the Generations of Christ) reprinted five times within his lifetime both written in 1543, three years before his death.[10] It is believed that Luther was influenced by Anton Margaritha's book Der gantze Jdisch Glaub (The Whole Jewish Belief).[11] Margaritha, a convert to Christianity who had become a Lutheran, published his antisemitic book in 1530 which was read by Luther in 1539. Margaritha's book was decisively discredited by Josel of Rosheim in a public debate in 1530 before Charles V and his court,[12] resulting in Margaritha's expulsion from the Empire.Do you always make claims that are so easily disproven?? Is that a habit of yours?

Ohl.. that 'bible beleivers' web site.Well, you could not have picked a more bigoted and deceitful , and frankly hateful web site as a source of information. It makes strong lies about the Talmud, it clams Islam is a 'moon cult', it has 'illuminati' conspiracy theories, saying the pope was seduced by them..It is very telling you use that site as a source.

Oh.. Quotes and things.You know.. the things they actually LIE about??? Sorry... but one thing people get judged on is the sources they use.Now, yes, Luther was a bigoted piece of Crap.. and that's because he accepted things about the Jews that were written by a liar and creep.Using that site to promote your bigotry doesn't do your credit any good.

Well, you heard wrong. Apparently, he got it second hand.....But, you have to repeat the whole 'The Jews are blasphemous ' charge.. without checking up on it yourself.

I think the irony meter just broke.