A 21 year old man sleeps with his mother-in-law... Two consenting adults-- they are unrelated. Immoral? If so, explain why.
Not immoral at all.
Is there no moral dilemma there? Would most wives be cool with their husband bringing other women in to the equation?
LOL.
Irrelevant since the definition of polyamory includes the concept of consent.
Are you ready to drop consent as a vanguard to moral relativity?
What a silly comment. Nowhere did I say consent is a vanguard of moral relativity, I said that consent is one of the conditions in some examples.
Moses spoke about it long before anyone new what genes were. That obviously means that it was taboo long before the advent of genetic testing.
More nonsense and irrelevancies. However the Bible also seems to condone incest as found in Genesis 19. Regardless, Moshe is only relevant within Judaic religions, no where else.
AbE:
The big thing is that morality really is unimportant beyond the personal level.
Even if someone thinks homosexuality is immoral, then the only thing is for them not to behave in a homosexual manner. Whether or not some other person behaves in a homosexual manner is, quite frankly, no one else's business.
There are though behaviors that we have decided are currently illegal. Those behaviors are unrelated to their so called morality. They are societal and cultural, and relative to the situation.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title and add section on morality.
Aslan is not a
Tame Lion