Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Deteriorating State :: Morality in the 21st Century
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 54 of 65 (401733)
05-21-2007 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Nuggin
05-20-2007 1:37 AM


Re: Morality in the 21st Centurty
Nuggin writes:
Were past actions immoral if the morality of the time didn't proclaim them so?
Thank you Nuggin. I keep wondering myself how we can say that morality is so subjective, and yet have no problem making our judgements retroactive, i.e., imposing our moral codes upon past cultures as a standard of judgement.
It seems like Jon is complaining because someone tried to impose their old-fashioned morality upon the new 'liberated' minds. The examples of horrific brainwashing which he gave were: pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-chastity...my, my. I don't even know what being a literalist fundamentalist has to do with it. I also don't know what is immoral about any of it. I expected when I read the opener to hear about some of the actual immorality we have going on today, which brings us back to the subjectiveness thought. My ideas of immorality in this century are definitely not the same as Jon's!
We are still experiencing something of the sexual revolution. Why do all talks about morality tend to revert back to human life and reproduction issues?
I see that allowing others to have choices and freedom is moral. It doesn't follow that all choices are necessarily equal. What is intrinsically better about teaching young people they can have sex whenever they like as long as it's protected? What is intrinsically better about telling kids they can have an abortion legally, so why not just go have more sex? What is so great about telling them that marriage is old-fashioned?
Groups that preach a message of chastity IMO are being very moral, so long as they aren't legally forcing anyone's hand. If someone is threatened by a message, that's sad. What exactly is wrong with the message of chastity? Don't we all have mistakes we could have avoided, and wouldn't it be morally wrong NOT to tell kids that they can choose to prevent unwanted pregnancies, STD's, broken homes, etc, without having to patch things up with abortions? I mean, come on. The right to an abortion doesn't make it any easier for a young girl to tell her parents, to raise the money, or to get to the clinic.
No one relishes the idea no matter how legal it is.
I would want my girls to live in a world where they are not sexual objects, where they don't have to stress under pressure, where they can say no and not feel like they aren't cool. How are we supposed to get the message of mutual respect across, when we keep acting like sex has no consequences that can't be dealt with? It's wrong, and backwards, and silly. You can't raise a responsible person with the notion that there is a always going to be a quick fix.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Nuggin, posted 05-20-2007 1:37 AM Nuggin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 05-22-2007 7:12 AM anastasia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024