Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Those ****ing Asterisks
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 378 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


(1)
Message 30 of 57 (628736)
08-12-2011 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Admin
08-12-2011 12:28 PM


Re: Censored Words
I say let people decide for themselves what they wish to be offended by and then let them be offended by it. For example, I find censorship to be among the most offensive of things. Far more offensive than being personally insulted.
Censor only what you absolutely must and err on the side of inclusion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Admin, posted 08-12-2011 12:28 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-12-2011 12:47 PM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 378 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 44 of 57 (628880)
08-13-2011 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Admin
08-13-2011 9:39 AM


Re: Censored Words Modification
Censored words are now replaced with asterisks only in the rendered message. The original words remain visible in Peek Mode and when editing.
The number of asterisks is now equal to the number of letters in the original word.
I appreciate the distinction between censoring here and having the option available on the software. If it is a useful tool for moderation it could still function behind the display.This pseudo censoring is an improvement but the whole idea of censoring is a dangerous concept.
It is counter productive in that it draws more attention to the words than would have otherwise been applied and thereby increases whatever harm you were trying to reduce.
It looks like you are censoring words but you are, in fact, trying to censor ideas. How many ways are there to express an idea?
beggar, black sheep, blackguard, bully, bum, cad, cardsharp, charlatan, cheat, delinquent, devil, disgrace, felon, fraud, good-for-nothing, grafter, hooligan*, hypocrite, idler, imp, liar, loafer, mischief-maker, miscreant, opportunist, pretender, prodigal, profligate, recreant, reprobate, robber, rowdy, ruffian, scamp, scoundrel, sinner, skunk, sneak*, swindler, tough*, tramp, trickster, varmint, villain, wastrel, wretch
Rules and regulations should evolve to be fewer and each one more effective. The tools are in place. If someone is out of line then suspend them. Having it as an overt function is another step toward legitimising the concept of censorship.
Asteriskized words look like pixelated nipples on a picture of a corpse.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Admin, posted 08-13-2011 9:39 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024