"Thuglicans" and the Tea "Federation Party"

I would say that that is a very deceptive and dishonest comment. The video does exist. It has been pulled because of copyright issues. Please explain this comment. Please enlighten this how this has anything to do with the civil war. Also, how are "non-secularists" oppressed? Classic wingnut response when anyone wants to have an America at all different than the wingnuts fantasy. Ever notice how liberals never seem to tell right wingers to leave the country. Not been to the coalfields have you? Maybe you might want to run by some of the large cattle and hog operations. Then tell me about toxic nightmares. Also you might notice those are some of the least populated states in the Union. Bullshit. Another in a long line of unfounded assertions. In the US no matter if your mother or father was black, you were considered black. No matter how small the percentage you were still considered black. The thing is most mixed births during the slave era were of black mother and a white father. That is because the white father raped the mother. If a black man had sex with a white woman he would have probably been lynched whther it was consensual or not.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

Pedantic? You make a claim that it doesn't exist. It does exist. Nothing pedantic there. Another assertion. Care to back it up with a valid argument?
Gee your funny. You actually are going to try to sell the idea that Partus sequitur ventrem is some sort of cover for racism. You seem to be covering up the purpose of laws like this.

quote:

---

The change also gave cover to the power relationships by which white planters, their sons and/or overseers took advantage of enslaved women. Their illegitimate mixed-race children were "confined" to slave quarters unless fathers took specific legal actions on their behalf. The new law in 1662 meant that white fathers were no longer required to legally acknowledge, support, or emancipate their illegitimate children by slave women. Men could sell their issue or put them to work. Given the prevalence of white males' taking advantage of women slaves, the law resulted in numerous slaves of primarily European ancestry, as European visitors noted in Virginia by the eighteenth century.

---

You failed to acknowledge my comments that children of a white father and black mother were usually children of rape. Laws like this just allowed the white rapists to not to have to acknowledge these children. This was an easy thing to do because the VAST majority of mixed race children had a white father. It was only in the last century that you saw mixed race children that had a back father. They were considered black by society as a whole as is Barack Obama.How about showing some examples from the slave era of children with black fathers and white mothers. I doubt they would have been allowed to survive birth.You present de jure but you completely ignore de facto.Finally you make this comment But can only show that this was part of the slave states and not a universal law.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

Did you skip replying to this on purpose? Please enlighten this how this has anything to do with the civil war. Also, how are "non-secularists" oppressed?

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

In other words, You cannot. Typical.

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

Are you clueless? The link was not broken. The video was removed for copyright reasons. Entirely different things. Also, to say it does not exist implies what, that the video does not exist. It does exist. Just not accessible from youtube. Vast difference than not existing and the implication you made by saying it did not exist. Partus sequitur ventrem is a straw man. That is what I was trying to say politely, but I see that is lost on you. Please point out what assertions you need evidence for. When I get back from vacation, I will gladly do the research to again show, as I have many times in the past, that you knowledge of American history is either nonexistent, or so colored by an agenda, that it might as well be non-existent..

---

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts