|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Born Again | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
The Greek text has it, anothen or "from above" rather than "again." ABE: Unless you are born from above....
I Corinthians 6:19 says:
quote: John 1:12 (American Standard Version)
quote: 1 John 5:11, 12:
quote: 1 Corinthians 12:13
quote: 14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. American Standard Version (ASV)Copyright 1901 Public Domain Galatians 3:26 26 For ye are all sons of God, through faith, in Christ Jesus. John 14:16
quote: Romans 10:6:
quote: When you corroborate those and other related scriptures, being born from above entails the following:
Jesus is up in the cosmos in his father, Jehovah's throne place on the right hand of Jehovah"s throne acting as our mediator, priest and sacrificial lord and savior. When we receive Jesus, he himself does not come down from Heaven. It is the spirit of Jesus and of Jehovah his father that comes into our very bodies, mind and spirit. This is when we become born from above, or spiritually born, becoming sons/children of God.> This is how Jesus is in the father (Jehovah), the father is in him, he in us and us in him. It's all by the Holy Spirit which is the only member of the Holy Trinity which is multi-present, being sent throughout the Universe, doing Jehovah's bidding.. This is the same spirit which moved upon the waters, etc, doing the work of creation on planet earth. Se also, Psalms 104:30. quote: Edited by Buzsaw, : As noted BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Jon writes: When you corroborate those and other related scriptures, being born from above entails the following:
But, then, is it really being born 'from above' at all? Jesus mentions a lot of these entailments throughout the Gospel of John as directives to his followers. But he never says anything about them being born 'from above', or 'born again'. Is the term just a misnomer? Jon Say what? John 3:5 is quoting Jesus telling Nicodemus that he must be born from above of God's spirit, i.e. the Holy Spirit, in order to see God's kingdom. If he didn't mean what he said, what do you think he meant? BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Jon writes: Say what? John 3:5 is quoting Jesus telling Nicodemus that he must be born from above of God's spirit, i.e. the Holy Spirit, in order to see God's kingdom. If he didn't mean what he said, what do you think he meant? There simply seems to be nothing overly special or procedural about what Jesus is saying. In fact, most of what he says to Nicodemus is just gibberish. There are no special instructions to help Nicodemus understand what it means to be born 'from above', and Nicodemus' repeated bouts of confusion testify to that fact. How are you so certain what the passage means without any further context? Even Jesus' discourse partner is baffled, with a confusion Jesus never bothers to clear up. Jon Why do you think I went to the work of citing corroborating scripture for the clarification of Jesus's statement. You're mine quoting Jesus, isolating one statement so as to obfuscate his message to Nicodemus. In so doing, you undermine the scripture and teaching of Jesus at large. Sons/children are not made. They are born. Adam and eve were intelligent human-kind creatures of God, designed after his image. NT spiritually born sons/children are what Nicodemus spoke of. In the OT, God's children of Israel were not instructed to refer to him as father. It was a different dispensational era of humanity. The OT predicted the kingdom of Jehovah to come on earth. The NT depicts a unique dispensation of a called out people from all nations to become the spiritual bride of Christ to rule with him for the messianic millennium prophesied for the latter days in the restored nation of Israel. It is the children or redeemed saints of Jehovah who will rule with Jesus on earth. Thus the prophecies of this new era are fast emerging into fulfillment before our eyes and ears. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
jar writes: Buzsaw writes: Say what? John 3:5 is quoting Jesus telling Nicodemus that he must be born from above of God's spirit, i.e. the Holy Spirit, in order to see God's kingdom. If he didn't mean what he said, what do you think he meant?Why do you think I went to the work of citing corroborating scripture for the clarification of Jesus's statement. You're mine quoting Jesus, isolating one statement so as to obfuscate his message to Nicodemus. In so doing, you undermine the scripture and teaching of Jesus at large. Sons/children are not made. They are born. Adam and eve were intelligent human-kind creatures of God, designed after his image. NT spiritually born sons/children are what Nicodemus spoke of. In the OT, God's children of Israel were not instructed to refer to him as father. It was a different dispensational era of humanity. The OT predicted the kingdom of Jehovah to come on earth. The NT depicts a unique dispensation of a called out people from all nations to become the spiritual bride of Christ to rule with him for the messianic millennium prophesied for the latter days in the restored nation of Israel. It is the children or redeemed saints of Jehovah who will rule with Jesus on earth. Thus the prophecies of this new era are fast emerging into fulfillment before our eyes and ears. Jar writes: Well, actually it was YOU once again taking quotes out of context and pretending that they support your position. Sons and children can be made, and are made throughout the Bible. Where in the OT does it speak of a new birth from above, i.e. spiritual birth for individuals? We're not talking about natural birth or physical creation, nor are we talking about nations. The Jews were the children of Israel, the messianic nation of Jehovah, not spiritually born individuals.
Jar writes: Once again you also misrepresent the Bible by making claims without referring to Chapter and Verse. Really? So where are your chapters and verses about the above, i.e. sons and children being made throughout the OT?
There is no support for original sin or original guilt to be found in the Old Testament and the concept of being Born Again was seen as continuing and ongoing task throughout out life in the Old Testament. Romans 5:8-19 ASV
quote: Edited by Buzsaw, : Quote fix BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
jar writes:
We have been down this path before. You've never addressed the passages colored in gold. Until you do that, the OT doctrine of original sin stands. God told Adam that the day he eats of the tree he would die. Adam lived hundreds of years after he ate but died spiritually, being separated from God spiritually. According to my colored in passages in the NT, that original sin of Adam passed on all of his descendents. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Jon writes: You've never addressed the passages colored in gold. Until you do that, the OT doctrine of original sin stands. Except that you've never offered any evidence for an 'OT doctrine of original sin', so there is no need to bother discrediting a notion that is already without any credit. There's little reason to disprove your thesis when you've never bothered to prove it in the first place. Jon According to the apostle Paul, the original sin of the original man, Adam, caused the curse of death on all of Adam's offspring, i.e. original sin/death. Are you denying Paul's allegation? Being born under the curse of sin, according to Paul, Jesus becomes the means of new life from the curse of death. Jesus calls this the spiritual birth according to John 3. Neither you or Jar are debating in good faith, ignoring the scriptural texts which I have cited. Enough of this nonsense that Buz is not on topic or is not supporting my position. You're both copping out with substanceless yada. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Jon writes: You claimed that 'original sin' was an 'OT doctrine'. None of Paul's writings are part of the OT, and so are irrelevant to the claim of 'original sin' being an 'OT doctrine'which, by the way, is irrelevant to the topic of this thread. It is an OT doctrine. Why do you think animal sacrifices were required of Jehovah for the sins of the nation, the family and the individual? Animal (not vegetable) sacrifices were required of Cain and Abel. Cain's veggie sacrifice was rejected by Jehovah because the sacrifice had to be a blood/death sacrifice. There had to be a sacrificial death to cover the sins of the people. Paul said "all have sinned and come short of the glory of God." Both OT and NT required a blood sacrifice for sin, the guiltless paying for the sins of the guilty. Finally Jesus died once and for all for the sins of the people and animal sacrifices ended at the death of Jesus when the Holy of Holies curtain was torn from the top to the bottom by God, indicating that the final sin sacrifice was paid for original sin. What has this got to do with "born again," i.e. spiritual birth? Once belief and receiving the sin sacrifices is effected, Jesus, one becomes born from above spiritually, absolved from the original sin curse pronounced by Jehovah in Genesis. Why do you think Jehovah told Adam the day he ate of the fruit he would die but he didn't die physically for centuries? Certainly the apostle Paul and Jesus implied that original sin was an OT doctrine. Else why did they cite Genesis as the authority for their teaching of original sin? BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
jar writes:
In the story God says that the very day they eat of the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil they will surely die. They don't die that day, or in many of the sequel stories. You added a significant word to the text which is not in the text, neither literally or by implication. That word is the adjective, very. Biblically the term day can mean a time frame or a very/literal 24 hr day, depending on text. In this context clearly it does not depict a literal 24 hr day. This has all been addressed in Message 224 and Message 226, in neither of which you effectively refuted my facts.
jar writes: The God in the story doesn't know what would be a good helpmeet for Adam until after he tries out all the other animals. (I hear Adam thought the sheep were the best, but in the story he doesn't get a vote.) For one who advocates literacy about the relative term day, your illiteracy regarding to the help mate decries your bibliophobic bias.
jar writes: God does not know where Adam and Eve are hiding so he has to call out "God does not know where Adam and Eve are hiding so he has to call out "All-ee All-ee in free". For Adam this might have been an "All-ee All-ee in free" hide and seek, but for the all knowing/omniscient Jehovah it was a means of flushing out an admission of guilt from the original sinners.
jar writes: Now looking at the story, God either lied about them dying the day they ate the fruit or God was wrong about it or God changed his mind. No, poor deluded fellow. It is just another example of your utter ignorance of basic Biblical doctrine.
jar writes: ...........God in the story had such a hard time figuring out what would be a suitable help meet for Adam, how the God in the story doesn't know where they are hiding or what the critters should be named, the most likely of the three is that God was just wrong. Again, no, Jar. The truth of the matter is that you are having such a hard time propagating your unsupported bibliophobic position. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024