Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Irreducible complexity- the challenges have been rebutted (if not refuted)
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 112 (56691)
09-20-2003 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Percy
01-09-2002 10:38 AM


quote:
I think I see what Larry is getting at. If I can explain by analogy, you can repair a Dodge with parts from a Chevy, but you'll run into lots of problems with parts that don't fit, and those require some extra work. You can borrow from Behe, but some parts don't fit with your views, and you need to address those issues. Is that it, Larry?
It seems to me that too much is being asked of John Paul here. Why not simply use the parts that fit well for what you want to do with them for your own project and forget involving yourself with extra work on parts that don't fit? Wouldn't that tend to draw the thread off topic and to serve as a means of distracting John Paul from the objective he wishes to achieve here? We all draw resource from sources which may not be compatible in every way with our thinking from time to time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Percy, posted 01-09-2002 10:38 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024