Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bible Buffet (Run-off From Noah's Flood)
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3926 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 1 of 66 (562698)
05-31-2010 10:54 PM


Do people tend to just pick and choose what they believe from the Bible (or unreasonable facsimile thereof) ??? It's worth discussing.
Message 75
Huntard writes:
Well, it was just to show that you were also picking and choosing from the bible, everyone is. Now, I'm not saying it's a bad thing, there's stuff in there that's really worth picking up, but nobody can say they live according to gods laws nowadays, they pick and choose what suits their fancy, and run with that, meanwhile telling everybody else how they are sinners because they don't follow "god's laws" (not saying you are like this, there are people like this though, care to join me in stopping them? )
Message 76
Flyer75 writes:
You are right, people do pick and choose what they wish to believe in Scripture, or to "fit their fancy". I'm certainly, as a sinner, guilty of that also, but it doesn't make it right even if "everyone is doing it". I also hope you don't think I'm calling OEC "sinners". I don't understand their thinking at all or their reasoning but in no way have I ever stated that one's view of origins is a salvation issue.
From Noahs Flood .
Inerrancy = Inaccuracy?

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by hooah212002, posted 06-01-2010 12:16 AM Iblis has replied
 Message 4 by Flyer75, posted 06-01-2010 2:10 AM Iblis has replied
 Message 65 by jar, posted 07-05-2010 9:58 AM Iblis has not replied

  
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3926 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


(1)
Message 20 of 66 (562814)
06-01-2010 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Flyer75
06-01-2010 2:10 AM


money, mouth
Flyer75 writes:
Yes, Iblis
Thanks for joining in. Isn't it awesome how you picked the frigging Inquisition as undoubtedly the safest example of Christianity gone amuck -- and were immediately jumped as a dangerous anti-Catholic chauvinistic cow-tipper? How dare you deny those hardworking papists their god-given first amendment right to uh, burn us at the stake? You HATER !!!
All with a straight face, too. It's a funny world, man
Anyway, you and Huntard were having a nice discussion about how the New Testament mediates Old Testament legalism, the universality of the Ten Commandments, etc. I think this could lead somewhere very much worth going.
this correspondent again writes:
In the meantime though, I would appreciate it if you could give your views, feeling and actions, in relation to the actual New Testament commandments. I'm thinking of things like not just not killing, but not hating; not just not adultering, but not lusting; not just loving your neighbor, but also loving your enemy.
When someone shoots you in the left leg, do you roll over on it to make it easier for them to pop one into your right leg as well? When someone kidnaps your daughter, do you run after them and make sure they take your wife too? When someone chains you to a truck and drags you a mile, do you grab onto the bumper and make sure you go along with them that second mile?
I'm stretching, I know. But you know what I'm talking about. Do you "resist not evil" ??? Or is that just crap that you can safely ignore?
A couple paragraphs about the ethical imperatives in the Dominical sayings. Examples from your own life. Yeah?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Flyer75, posted 06-01-2010 2:10 AM Flyer75 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Flyer75, posted 06-03-2010 3:00 PM Iblis has replied

  
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3926 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 25 of 66 (562822)
06-02-2010 1:46 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by hooah212002
06-01-2010 12:16 AM


literature
Hi hooah, I've really been enjoying your posts lately. I've been meditating on this one pretty hard, because I don't want to come off as just disagreeing with you; but I do hope that I can add something to your understanding, or clarify things maybe, if I'm smart enough.
Of course. Otherwise, there wouldn't be the multitude of denominations of christianity there are. I, personally, have come to read it literally and the same I would a contemporary piece of literature: because that's what it is. I had a reading teacher in 8th grade who was, in my opinion, a bit over the top in his methods. However, he did teach us to pretty much tear about text. I remember reading a poem in class and we spent a good 20 minutes discussing why the writer used the word "the". This was a standard 8th grade reading class, not advanced, mind you.
Agree really hard. And when you read it that way, as literature, you can see that there are different genres involved. And these have to be dealt with in different ways, yes?
At any rate, when you allow yourself to read the bible as allegory or parable, you open it up to a multitude of interpretations, none more right or wrong than the next. Couple that with an unwavering amount of faith in you particular interpretation, and you can see how no good can come from it.
Here's where I think things get too fuzzy. It is allegory, amongst many other things. Just as an example, the bit that bred this thread, the Deluge myth, is three different strands of literature woven together. At the bottom is a narrative text culled off some ancient poetry, full of puns and language-rich material. Basically similar to the Viking sagas. Then on top of that is a folk tale from oral tradition, that evolved in the course of the ministry of the northern prophets. Then on top of that is a set of inline notes and commentary from the Persian restoration.
So while it has elements of allegory, it isn't open to "a multitude of interpretations, none more right or wrong than the next." It tells you right in the text what the interpretation is. This part, the rainbow for example, means he learned his lesson. No matter how bad he fucks up, he won't just erase the chalkboard and start over again. It repenteth him that he made us, sure; but it also repenteth him that he drowned us. He is learning from his mistakes, he is trying to improve. This process continues, covenant after covenant, until he steps up and takes full responsibility for the whole mess.
The lying buck-passing apologetics that you are concerned about, isn't a legitimate interpretation of the text. The text is all about giving up idolatry, step by step. The apologetics is about making the text into a new idol.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by hooah212002, posted 06-01-2010 12:16 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by hooah212002, posted 06-02-2010 2:07 AM Iblis has replied

  
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3926 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 27 of 66 (562825)
06-02-2010 2:58 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by hooah212002
06-02-2010 2:07 AM


Re: literature
What rainbow are you talking about?
I'm sorry, I should have been more explicit. I've been assuming that you are familiar with this story.
Genesis 9:14,15 writes:
And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:
And I will remember my covenant, which [is] between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
You see? It tells you right there what that part Means.
If you want a god who fucks up and can't get it right the first 3 times, be my guest.
It isn't a matter of what I want, it's just the plain sense of how the text portrays the character.
Genesis 6:7 writes:
And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
I don't get to twist it around however I please, that sort of behavior is for people in denial. The story says what it says.
I have to ask though: is it worth dedicating your life to a no-good hack?
No worries there; just as he is depicted as first among idols, so also was he the last.
John 13:27 writes:
Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly.
So now they worship the book, about giving up idols. Funny damned world, indeed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by hooah212002, posted 06-02-2010 2:07 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by hooah212002, posted 06-02-2010 3:30 AM Iblis has not replied

  
Iblis
Member (Idle past 3926 days)
Posts: 663
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 49 of 66 (563159)
06-03-2010 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Flyer75
06-03-2010 3:00 PM


Re: money, mouth
I'm not sure what your point is in this really.
I'm trying to get to the heart of this "pick and choose" question. When Huntard asked you about Old Testament commandments, you deflected his question with New Testament references. (Apparently it's ok for you to have a tattoo, because, Peter had a dream about some edible vermin?) When I ask you about New Testament commandments, you dodge over into theology about forgiveness.
Are you just a hypocrite? If so, fine. You are forgiven. But in such a case, you cannot speak with authority. People who tell us that their interpretation of the scripture is definitive, need to be able to show how that interpretation works out in their lives. All your sins are forgiven. Your beliefs are your opinions, about your faith. Your faith is invisible to us. So, what are your works? When is the last time, that you did one of those hard things the gospels tell us to do, and how did that work out?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Flyer75, posted 06-03-2010 3:00 PM Flyer75 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024