Those drugs are used in shamanistic religions and there is some question whether it is the chemicals alone or the demonic influence associated with the drugs' use that causes the hallucinations. Demon lore has it that they associate themselves with certain places and substances so they'd just follow the drugs to the new users.
LSD is not used for ritual purposes - it was created relatively recently.
Peyote was simply one other example, and its use is not restricted to religious purposes.
You are claiming, then, that even though these drugs cause hallucinations, it's simply because demons follow the drugs? Like LSD molecules are actually little demonic gateways?
...
You really seem to be reaching, Faith. We have ironclad evidence that chemical substances cause hallucinations regardless of the religious leanings of the individual taking them. We have further evidence that mentally ill individuals suffering from hallucinations can be treated with medication.
The
reasonsble conclusion is that chemicals imbibed by a person can affect their brain. This is even
further backed up by monitoring brain activity when these sorts of drugs are administered.
You're turning this whole "demonic influence" bit into yet another unfalsifiable unsupported assertion: hallucinations are supposedly caused by demons, something we cannot see or detect, and anything
else like chemical influences that seems to have an effect on either causing or relieving hallucinations is attributed to still more demonic activity.
So I'll ask again: why on Earth should
anyone believe what you're saying here? Occam's Razor suggests that, if the phenomenon of hallucinations can be explained just as well with the assertion of demonic causes as it can without, and there is no additional evidence suggesting demonic forces, then the explanation that does not assert the unsupported extraneous factor is to be preferred.
By the
exact same reasoning you're using, I could claim that hallucinations are all the result of direct communication with the Flying Spaghetti Monster, that taking hallucinogenics is a form of inviting his noodly presence, and that anti-psychotics work because they ask him to back off. Such a scenario is similarly unsupported and unnecessary, yet fits just as well with reality as your imagined demons.
I would suggest that the
logical answer is that hallucinations are not supernatural in origin, but are rather the result of aberrant brain activity which can be caused by natural chemical imbalances and dysfunction as in the case of the mentally ill, or can be artificially induced by the introduction of foreign chemicals into the body.
I would suggest that your assertions about demons are nothing more than irrational nonsense.