The problem with ID as I see it is that it can only apply after all normal scientific explanations are exhausted, and it still doesn't answer the question or prevent a future scientific explanation.
This makes ID a mental end-game with no real purpose other than comfort to those who find little in the real world.
When you think about genetic manipulation (where a specific mutation is artificially induced) and compare that to an actual random mutation (occuring by chance), is there any way that you can conceive of a test to differentiate them?
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.