The utility of ID

There are still a few 'cojanes' around however. I have noticed an interesting twist in Kant's Critique of Judgement that I think is the effect of the lack of expressed cause further on the part of any ID friends rather than the need to express the event probabalistically as I did before here on EvC. It seems that there is figurative langague to raise ID above other issues in creationism but there is trascendent "ground"(sic!) to suggest that there are other creation connections that need be dug up first. I will explain this futher with respect to "prudence" and maggot growth THROUGH corruption later.

Geoffrory's notion of the inversion (in arthropods to Earth, vertebrates to our Sun) can infantalise Gould's epitome of Goethe's importance in hoxology, if parrallel with evergreens moving to the same Earth and Angiosperms to the mass of the solar system is an orbit of the same class of trajectories. This would show up in the proteins of current evo-devo discussion if true but would remove the "appearence of age" from Gould's plants(that have "lateral" leaves) and return the 'ground' to a proper evaluation when studying EITHER plants or animals. Gould went too far to think he make some concept that seperated them without really saying if the segement was not something that Newton's work also directly applies to or not. Thus Gould shunted off the direct imposition and "transcendentalism" of Geoffroy in the same paleontologyEdited by Brad McFall, : No reason given.Edited by Brad McFall, : correct spelling error