Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   ID as Science vs. ID as Creationism
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 3 of 46 (454642)
02-08-2008 2:41 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Minnemooseus
02-08-2008 1:13 AM


To convince me that ID is scientific the ID movement would have to act like a genuine scientific movement. Which would mean most of it going away. They don't need the lawyers or the PR and many of the Discovery Institute Fellows (some of whom are real embarrassments) could go.
But I don't think that the ID movement really wants to do that. As I've said before they want to give the appearance of being scientific when it's convenient just as they want to give the impression of being a religious movement when it is convenient.
The impression I get from the Wedge document is that they assumed that the science would simply fall into place. When it didn't, they decided it wasn't so important after all/

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Minnemooseus, posted 02-08-2008 1:13 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024