Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

ID as Science vs. ID as Creationism

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   ID as Science vs. ID as Creationism
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 46 (454717)
02-08-2008 11:55 AM 		Reply to: Message 10 by tesla
02-08-2008 11:50 AM

Re: admitting God
quote:
the truth is, no one can say God is not (no proof) and other's will argue no proof that God is. so already its accepted by the masses and even scientists, that God potentially is. (meaning, with no definite proof either way, it is possible in theory)
​
em..no. People who might happen to be scientists might say something about god, the practice of science by scientists say nothing at all about God, so it no "not accepted".
This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by tesla, posted 02-08-2008 11:50 AM tesla has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024