I don't think you are being completely honest with your own self here.
Rather than just reject the idea of a mystical supernatural entity, you reinforce your rejection with a challenge to the theist to show complete consistancy with some doctrine of divine omniscience.
Hoping to expose logical inconistancies with taking an idea to the Nth degree accomplished for you (or so you think) justifying belief in God is unjustified.
The point I am making is not that the supernatural idea is wrong, but this supernatural entity is given every human quality, good & bad.
The point I am making is that there is no evidence that a supernatural "being" exists. Given a supernatural force could explain the situation, but gods are not stated as forces, but as thinking, acting beings that happen to be above life and above the forces with control the universe. Look at the concept itself. When did man start believing in gods? When he couldn't explain the existance of something, like the sun, moon, rain, the seasons, animals etc.
He invented the anthropomorphic being or beings, giving them human, with superhuman qualities. That is the concept I reject. That is the concept that there is no evidence of.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
™ Version 4.2
