Kinds are not related

First question comes to mind which did not jump out at me:1: how many animals TOTAL do you suppose were on the Ark?Provided what your answer is will determine my next line of questions.

Well, with your grammatical fuckfest you call a post, I had a hard time swallowing any of the drivel you typed. It makes it hard to take someone serious when they use words like "cleverer" So, you make a totally random, factless HYPOTHESIS, and the burden of proof is on US to disprove it? Science doesn't work that way pal.The remainder of your nonsense is nothing more than you stating what you guess about the world around you, having no scientific knowledge of any sort, making totally random assumptions, then telling us to prove you wrong. I am a devout Pastafarian, prove MY god, the FSM, doesn't exist. Can't do it? Well then, I guess you are wrong and I am right. Because as we all know, it was the FSM who created some mountains and midgets first.

You have to have pondered it at least once. i want to hear how many TOTAL animals were aboard the Ark. Then, explain how they were cared for.Then, how the food was stored.Then, how the dung was dealt with.Once you have crapatulated (my word) about that, explain how one man, using NO modern technology more than maybe a pulley type system, built the largest wooden ship ever conceived. How much help did he have? The answers are staring you in the face.Edited by hooah212002, : comma's not properly placed, or a lack thereofEdited by hooah212002, : fixed last sentence

Let's say, for example, you invent something. You use absolutely no inspiration from anything else, thus making it completely and utterly original.Do you make something that "just works"?Think about the human head, for example. Doesnt it seem a wee bit too big for our neck? How many other animals have a problem with things such as whiplash? IMO, humans have one of the worst physical "designs" of all of the animal kingdom.Blindspot? poor peripheral vision? Back problems? Allergies?

We don't need "magical transitional fossils"....we already have real ones.You are the one who needs the magic bit to try and prove anything.

Oddly enough, Atheists usually know the bible better than people like yourself. Why? because we actually STUDY. Not just read and believe one particular bible, but rather, compare ALL accounts of ALL the copies available to us.We also read comprehensively. Study the words and seek the truth.

So, you've met alot of young earther's, eh?

Your lack of knowledge does not make his statements false. If you can't understand it, that is your fault. It does not make you right and him wrong.

So you boast about being willingly ignorant?Give me your definiton of facts:.Now give me your definition of evidence. riiiight. Because no actual work or study went into creating them. I think you've successfully diagnosed yourself. Now please, immediately seek a library. Do not pass GO, do not collect $200. You would be surprised at what real knowledge will do for you. You might learn what actual facts are, not what hovind tells you are facts.