Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Kinds are not related

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kinds are not related
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 80 (520078)
08-19-2009 9:28 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
08-19-2009 5:55 AM

the families of the world would be related by design, rather than biology, although obviously you would have close genetics in the same kind.
​
Why? Given that ...
​
"kinds" are groups of animals of the same design-type, rather than relatedness
​
If 'kinds' are based on design type rather than relatedness why should they have close genetics at all?
​
So basically no one can know what kind any animal belongs to or if any 2 animals are of the same kind. Sounds totally useless to me, keep up the good work.
​
TTFN,
​
WK
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 08-19-2009 5:55 AM mike the wiz has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by mike the wiz, posted 08-20-2009 7:48 AM Wounded King has replied
  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 22 of 80 (520271)
08-20-2009 8:43 AM 		Reply to: Message 17 by mike the wiz
08-20-2009 7:48 AM

Does that strike you as theologically relevant at all?
​
No, but it does strike me as biologically incoherent, and these are the science forums after all.
​
TTFN,
​
WK
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by mike the wiz, posted 08-20-2009 7:48 AM mike the wiz has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by mike the wiz, posted 08-21-2009 6:41 AM Wounded King has not replied
  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 60 of 80 (520459)
08-21-2009 3:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 58 by mike the wiz
08-21-2009 2:27 PM

Re: Imagination versus evidence
When did I state that mutations don't exist? I don't see any evidence at all that they change morphology. can you give examples otherwise I retain my opinion.
​
For examples please see essentially THE ENTIRE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, which doesn't give 2 hoots for your uninformed opinion.
​
TTFN,
​
WK
​
P.S. Sorry about the caps, I came over all funny.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by mike the wiz, posted 08-21-2009 2:27 PM mike the wiz has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024