Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Objections to Evo-Timeframe Deposition of Strata
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 210 of 310 (189177)
02-28-2005 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Faith
02-28-2005 10:03 AM


quote:
but there is absolutely no doubt that a worldwide Flood occurred.
JM: I think the point being made is that there is considerable doubt that a worldwide flood occurred. On the other hand, what is the point of discussing the issue with someone who has reached a foregone conclusion based on a personal disbelief of what he/she observes? There's nothing wrong, of course, with such a dogmatic stance, but it does tend to stifle deeper discussion with those who disagree with you.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Faith, posted 02-28-2005 10:03 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by Faith, posted 03-14-2005 1:15 PM Joe Meert has not replied

Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 306 of 310 (191735)
03-15-2005 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 305 by PaulK
03-15-2005 3:18 PM


and if you look on this page at the boulder conglomerate beneath the Bonneterre limestone you will see variable thickness. In fact this pinches out near the edge of the outcrop.
Geology at 200 d
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 305 by PaulK, posted 03-15-2005 3:18 PM PaulK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024