Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Incompatibility of Geology with YEC
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 20 of 66 (352675)
09-27-2006 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by kjsimons
09-27-2006 3:35 PM


Re: Forget about the FIELDS, the ACTUAL geology refutes a young earth.
You left out one of my favorite examples geology Faith can't explain, the Hawaiian Islands. Only one "hot spot" and several islands, with the islands getting older and more eroded the further away they are from the hot spot. I would like to see Faith explain that!
Just to roll even further off-topic - this is similar to one of my favorite proofs of evolutionary methods.
In such a chain of islands (maybe the Hawaiians, not sure), several related beetle species were identified.
Geologic methods showed that the islands went from younger to older in one direction. Genetic analysis of beetle species on each of those islands, independantly, showed that the beetle species went from most-recently diverged to most-distantly diverged - in the exact same order. The youngest island geologically held the youngest species of beetles.
Two different labs, two different fields, two entirely different means of dating predicated on entirely unrelated assumptions - both arrive at the same fact. That's proof that the tools of evolutionary study aren't just made-up scientific wankery but legitimate and accurate investigations into physical reality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by kjsimons, posted 09-27-2006 3:35 PM kjsimons has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024