Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Incompatibility of Geology with YEC
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 39 of 66 (353024)
09-29-2006 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by GDR
09-28-2006 11:24 PM


Re: Not going to work
[Edit - Must have hit the "reply button on the wrong message - this is to Faith]
It seems to me that you place your faith in your churches power to dictate to God. The Bible doesn't claim to be God's literal word (although I expect your church to say otherwise - and if they do they prove me right). The Bible doesn't say that Genesis 1 was entirely dictated by God or intended by Him to be taken as literal truth. All that is human belief.
Against that you have a huge amount of scientific work, which YECs cannot equal - not even in relatively small things. Flood geology is about 100 years old and still doesn't have geological criteria to identify flood rocks or a viable explanation for the order in the fossil record. By any rational standard YEC is a failed human creation.
If the core of YEC is placing falsehoods in God's mouth and commanding that they be worshipped, how could any Christian follow it ?
Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by GDR, posted 09-28-2006 11:24 PM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 09-29-2006 3:44 AM PaulK has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 46 of 66 (353041)
09-29-2006 5:08 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Faith
09-29-2006 3:44 AM


Re: Not going to work
quote:
ALL rocks are flood rocks -- except maybe bedrock and volcanic intrusions from beneath -- but those are best explained in relation to the flood too.
That's just your opinion - it isn't even accepted by all YECs.
Worse for you, by your own admission you are not competent to work out what explanation is the "most reasonable". If we look at secondary consideratiosn we can observe that mainstream geology is scientifically a great success while flood geology is a failure. It follows then that your only basis for your assertion is a belief that you personally must be correct.
quote:
The rest of your post is just the usual accusations based on who knows what so this is all I want to say.
It is based on the facts - for instance the fact that you keep attributing your views to God, but never actually give any evidence that He actually said any of it. Why not consider the possibility that God did NOT say a word of it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Faith, posted 09-29-2006 3:44 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024