Well, let's look at them.
I must admit that my education was some time ago, but I can say that those were not actually what I was taught. In addition, they are for the most part just nonsense statements.
1. Neaderthal was ape-like and not at the level of modern humans, the impression is that he could not, for instance, have mated with people.
What does that statement mean? I was taught that Neaderthal lived in communities, likely had fire, made tools, seemed to have some belief structure, took care of injured members of the community. The question of mating was open and unresolved.
So the only reasonable conclusion is that randman is simply talking nonsense.
2. Cro-Magnon man was a missing link. Actually, I don't see any bioligical differences between Cro-Magnon and us except that Cro-Magnons were typically taller.
Again, that was simply not what I was taught. In fact, I cannot remember the question of a missing link even coming up except as a joke. The second sentence is simply randman stating that he is incredulous. Hardly evidence.
3. Haeckel's drawings.
4. the phylotypic stage in embryos
5. fish gills in human embryos
A whole thread has been devoted to that issue.
6. Fossils documenting evolution which was the very gradual change from one species to another (false impression since fossil record does not show that)
Again, a mistatement. There are many examples of fossils that show gradual change. One good example is the changes in shellfish over time. There are also examples of rapid change. There is no reason that both cannot happen simultaneously.
7. Micro-evolution proves ToE
IMHO, kinda. It is certainly one of the things that support the TOE but as you have been told, there is a difference between the TOE and evolution. Science also hold tentativity as a basic tenet. That makes his assertion only yet another of his many unsupported and incorrect assertions.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion