Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   You Guys Need to Communicate! (thoughts from an ex evangelical Christian)
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 50 of 200 (385621)
02-16-2007 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by NosyNed
02-16-2007 11:04 AM


Re: Not about statements
I think that taking things on faith is not a good thing at all. It is what you do when you don't have time or don't think it is worth investing effort to determine the credibility of an idea. It is a stop gap and not a good thing to be praised at all.
Easy to say from the comfort of the educated middle-class... I see many not-so-fortunate individuals take immense comfort in their faith - people who otherwise would have very little to live for, or had previous lifestyles that were certainly counterproductive to society. These are not people who would ever consider the idea of "investing effort to determine the credibility of an idea", not least because they would struggle with the meaning of at least two of the words in quotes. Nearly everything they have learnt has been taken on faith, religious or not.
Furthermore, speaking on behalf of most of the Christians I know, they do have a great deal of evidence to back up their faith - the fact that we would describe such evidence as purely subjective and existential will not faze them in the slighest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 11:04 AM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 1:39 PM cavediver has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 53 of 200 (385640)
02-16-2007 1:58 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by NosyNed
02-16-2007 1:39 PM


Re: comfort
I happen to think there are other values in what we see in moderate religious organizations
Absolutely... I wasn't implying that this was by any means the only, err, "excuse" as you call it
And I am very familiar with the quote... soundbites make for good humour but not good criticism - nor anything else for that matter. If we want to work on the level of this quote then it is obvously down to personal state of mind vs effect on society. On this basis it is abundantly clear that comparing believer/skeptic to drunk/sober is bogus. I am very pleased by the level of no-strings social work performed by the church I attend... it is why I support them. Of course, this is balanced by all manner of social injustices carried out by Christians... I'm not so sure there is such a balance in the social effect of drunkard behaviour.
And we know from psychology that such subjective experience are not evidence that a rational person should trust. All you do is prove that there is danger in even moderate religious thought by suggesting that such experiences should count for anything at all.
Do you still have the records you kept from when you first met your wife? I trust you wrote them up and submitted them for peer-review?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 1:39 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 7:07 PM cavediver has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 87 of 200 (385925)
02-18-2007 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by NosyNed
02-16-2007 7:07 PM


Re: bogus sound bite
The underlying valid issue is deciding that something is good if you are made happy even if it is false
But what is false? The state of mind induced by alcohol compared to our natural evolved state of mind uninfluenced by external chemicals? (Not that we can really avoid extrenal input. Blood sugar level has a marked effect upon mood-state)
And even if it is false - what about the good old holodeck dilemma, portrayed wonderfully by Cypher in the Matrix. Why live a crap life in the "real" world when you can live out your fantasies in a pseudo-world?
You won't find a bigger explorer of truth than me, whether it is in the dark abode of black holes, towering mountain tops, or the deepest most remote caves. But even I would be tempted by the allure of the holodeck.
And I'm fine with you ddeclaring YECism, US fundie Christianity, etc as false - but to say God cannot reach and touch people through the crap of their surrounding religion is pushing your own beliefs a little too strongly.
I got it very right the second time
Glad to hear it
It is the total disregard for rationality ingendered by falling in love that makes for some very bad marriages.
..and of course some very bad religion. Total agreement here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by NosyNed, posted 02-16-2007 7:07 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 88 of 200 (385928)
02-18-2007 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by nator
02-16-2007 9:50 PM


Re: Dissenting thoughts
quote:
I doubt that anybody intends to "brainwash" or to "indoctrinate" their kids, even if they are actually doing it. I don't think people make a point to do this because of its negative connotations.
I certainly agree. But it is indeed done, all the time to a greater or lesser degree, in most Christian and Muslim sects, at least.
I think that one can teach children anything you want as long as you make it clear that they have to learn to be critical thinkers and not just accept things because an authority figure tells them it is so.
They should be taught that what they believe is up to THEM, not anybody else.
Do you really think that the majority of parents - whether Christian, Muslim, or couldn't-give-a-damn - think about raising their kids to be critical thinkers? They don't even know what a "critical thinker" is!! All parents raise their kids with their own prejudices. In our (rather special) case, its the prejudice of educational snobbery

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by nator, posted 02-16-2007 9:50 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by anastasia, posted 02-18-2007 11:32 AM cavediver has not replied
 Message 93 by nator, posted 02-18-2007 12:31 PM cavediver has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 97 of 200 (385954)
02-18-2007 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by nator
02-18-2007 12:31 PM


Re: Dissenting thoughts
My point to Juggs was that many, many Christian and Muslim sects actively seek to remove or hinder that ability of children to think for themselves
I would have to ask for evidence of the many many sects that "actively seek to remove or hinder..."
I would be happy with "unwittingly (and in extreme cases actively seek to) remove or hinder..."
And my point in return is that this is also true of many, many non-religious families.
quote:
In our (rather special) case, its the prejudice of educational snobbery
Ah, I see.
No, you don't, but it's my fault for not being clear. I was raising this in isolation from the previous discussion. I was merely pointing out that we will pass on our own prejudices - we're not immune.
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by nator, posted 02-18-2007 12:31 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by nator, posted 02-19-2007 8:53 AM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024