Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 1 of 300 (221703)
07-04-2005 5:11 PM


On this board we argue over this or that detail of creation etc. But a fundamental difference between the evolution & science side of the debate and the creation & religious side, is that it is only on the religious side that true peace can be found. While science can be very interesting, it doesn't gave meaning to our lives or tell us why we are here. To find real inner peace we have to look to God. To find real inner you have to know were to look, here is a link to a very good article on finding it. (two articles) "Can You Find Inner Peace?" http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/7/1/article_01.htm
That is the inner peace we can have by knowing God, now since inner peace is something that we all want and need to have, what is the alternative from the other side of the debate? What inner peace can atheism offer other than the kind mentioned on tombstones? RIP? This need for what can only be found by having a relationship with God, argues for there being a god. This is one of the key things that sets us apart from the animals, we have a spiritual side to us that they just don't have.
This need for inner peace is a basic human need, I am curious to see what alternatives atheists would offer in place of it.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminJar, posted 07-04-2005 5:30 PM wmscott has replied
 Message 12 by crashfrog, posted 07-07-2005 6:46 PM wmscott has replied
 Message 179 by Brad McFall, posted 08-20-2005 3:49 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 212 by Faith, posted 09-07-2005 9:53 AM wmscott has not replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 3 of 300 (222269)
07-06-2005 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminJar
07-04-2005 5:30 PM


Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
Dear Jar;
Here is my revised OP.
On this board we argue over this or that detail of creation etc. But a fundamental difference between the evolution & science side of the debate and the creation & religious side, is that it is only on the religious side that true peace can be found. While science can be very interesting, it doesn't gave meaning to our lives or tell us why we are here. To find real inner peace we have to look to God. To find real inner you have to know were to look, here is a link to a very good article on finding it. (two articles) "Can You Find Inner Peace?" http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/7/1/article_01.htm & http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2000/7/1/article_02.htm
The fact that spirituality creates an inner peace that improves mental health, improves coping skills and even has physical health benefits, is well documented by research findings as shown by the following abstract quotes.
Spirituality has become a subject of interest in health care as it is was recognized to have the potential to prevent, heal or cope with illness. There is less doubt that values and goals are important contributors to life satisfaction, physical and psychological health, and that goals are what gives meaning and purpose to people's lives.
Role of religion and spirituality in medical patients: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK questionnaire | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Full Text
There is a recognized connection between spirituality and health, and nurse leaders have acknowledged the importance of the spiritual as well as the physical in providing optimal nursing care. Spirituality goes beyond religious or cultural boundaries. Spirituality is characterized by faith, a search for meaning and purpose in life, a sense of connection with others, and a transcendence of self, resulting in a sense of inner peace and well-being. A strong spiritual connection may improve one's sense of satisfaction with life or enable accommodation to disability.
Link to paper:
It appears that religious beliefs and associated moral habits vitally affect health attitudes and behaviors. As a result of this causal relationship, health and disease indices vary in important ways according to the penetration of these beliefs into the daily fabric of the patient's life. Three religious dispositions, born of fundamental belief, anchor those moods and behaviors which profoundly influence health. As these three overarching themes purity of life, peace in existence, and belief in immortality are common to most religions, this paradigm might serve to organize further research on those belief characteristics which have health import. More work is needed to differentiate the relative importance of interacting variables where religion and health are considered; for this inquiry will produce insights with great significance for preventive medicine and public health. As the public response to health care possibilities and imperatives may depend on the penetration and pervasiveness of religious feelings and disciplines, the general culture will benefit from the discoveries of this investigation.
Link to paper:
Spirituality generally relates to better mental health, greater well-being, and higher quality of life. Physical health and medical outcomes may also be affected.
Link to paper:
Research has shown that religiosity and spirituality significantly contribute to psychosocial adjustment to cancer and its treatments. Religion offers hope to those suffering from cancer, and it has been found to have a positive effect on the quality of life of cancer patients. Numerous studies have found that religion and spirituality also provide effective coping mechanisms for patients as well as family caregivers. Research indicates that cancer patients who rely on spiritual and religious beliefs to cope with their illness are more likely to use an active coping style in which they accept their illness and try to deal with it in a positive and purposeful way. Faith-based communities also offer an essential source of social support to patients, and religious organizations can play a direct and vital role in cancer prevention by providing screening, counseling, and educational programs, especially in minority communities.
Link to paper:
The degree of positive effectiveness is related to the degree of religiousness, the more religious or 'closer to God' the person was, the more effective was their inner peace or coping.
FINDINGS: Higher meaning in life scores were associated with higher psychological well-being and lower symptom distress scores. Higher prayer scores were associated with higher psychological well-being scores. Regression analysis indicated that meaning in life mediated the relationship between functional status and physical responses to lung cancer and explained 9% of the variance in symptom distress. Prayer mediated the relationship between current physical health and psychological responses and explained 10% of the variance in psychological well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of spirituality, meaning in life, and prayer have positive effects on psychological and physical responses in this group of people with lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This research provides knowledge about spirituality and sense of well-being to guide the care of people with lung cancer.
Link to paper:
These articles cover mostly christian religions in general, since the quality or effectiveness of the inner peace was dependant on the degree of religiousness, it is to be expected that some religions will be much more effective than others and some will even have a negative effect. What is important is the degree of religiousness for achieving this general type of inner peace. There is a second kind of inner peace that only comes from God by means of his son. (John 14:27) "I leave YOU peace, I give YOU my peace. I do not give it to YOU the way that the world gives it. Do not let YOUR hearts be troubled nor let them shrink for fear." Biblically Christians have been given the gift of peace by Jesus Christ. This having the 'peace of God' is an important part of being a Christian. Paul referred to this peace many times in his letters.
(Romans 1:7) . . .May YOU have undeserved kindness and peace from God . . .
(Romans 15:33) "May the God who gives peace be with all of YOU."
(Romans 16:20) . . .the God who gives peace . . .
(Philippians 4:6-7) Do not be anxious over anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication along with thanksgiving let YOUR petitions be made known to God; and the peace of God that excels all thought will guard YOUR hearts and YOUR mental powers by means of Christ Jesus.
(Philippians 4:9) . . .practice these; and the God of peace will be with you.
(2 John 3) There will be with us undeserved kindness, mercy [and] peace from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Son of the Father, with truth and love.
The peace of God is not given to all who claim to follow God, according to Philippians 4:9 we have to practice what was taught to the congregations. "practice these; and the God of peace will be with you."
This peace of God which he gives to those who serve him, is a very calming peace and has carried true servants of God through horrors like the Nazi concentration camps. ("When I met Jehovah's Witnesses I saw they were not damaged," he said. "They were still intact. How could they survive without the suffering and mental damage I had?"- http://zephyr.unr.edu/.../fall_02_pages/fredrickson_hol.html )That is the inner peace we can have by knowing God, now since inner peace is something that we all want and need to have, what is the alternative from the other side of the debate? This is one of the key things that sets us apart from the animals, we have a spiritual side to us that they just don't have.
This need for inner peace is a basic human need, I am curious to see what alternatives atheists would offer in place of it.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminJar, posted 07-04-2005 5:30 PM AdminJar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminJar, posted 07-06-2005 9:41 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 7 by bobbins, posted 07-06-2005 11:32 PM wmscott has replied
 Message 8 by robinrohan, posted 07-06-2005 11:37 PM wmscott has replied
 Message 9 by mikehager, posted 07-07-2005 12:18 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 13 of 300 (222424)
07-07-2005 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by JustinC
07-06-2005 11:15 PM


Dear JustinC;
I am going to die one day, and I believe that will be the end of me. I've accepted that, that is my reality. It doesn't hinder my inner peace, though, it strengthens it.
I respect your courage and honesty, you have accepted your end and made peace with it. I wish everyone would face things as unflinchingly as you have. That being said, I will also point out that you have accepted the unacceptable, being willing to give up existing. What if there is an alternative? Reminds me of when a ferry sank and the Moslems on board accepted it as the will of Ala and drowned, while the others swam to shore. You owe it to yourself to find out if there is a hope that is real. I claim to have found that there is one, it is the only hope there is, so I advise you to check it out. My belief is not based on pure faith or wishful thinking, I have logically proved it as being real and you can do the same. Accepting nonexistence if it were truly the only possibility would be realistic, but it is not a hope or even healthy for your mind. I find any idea that embraces death or fatalism, unhealthily and a very bad standard to live by. One should be able to do better than having a hope of aspiring to be compost.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by JustinC, posted 07-06-2005 11:15 PM JustinC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by JustinC, posted 07-09-2005 2:12 AM wmscott has not replied
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2005 3:10 AM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 14 of 300 (222427)
07-07-2005 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by bobbins
07-06-2005 11:32 PM


Re: Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
Dear bobbins;
Peace is referred to as true and inner and real. Which? All? Inner peace equals knowing the meaning of life and having a purpose in life. Most atheists have a very good appreciation of purpose in life (survival, procreation) and meaning (same thing along with acceptance of your own mortality). Does that equal inner peace without reference to a god? For me it does. No god required or religion or a spiritual dimension.
Yes I agree that atheists can have inner peace, of a basic sort. In talking about inner peace, and true inner peace, I am talking about degrees of peace and types of inner peace. The basic kind is just being at peace with yourself, a deeper inner peace would be being at peace with yourself and with God while true or real inner peace in the perfect sense would be the peace that comes from God by the holy spirit. That is the kind of peace Jehovah's Witnesses displayed in the concentration camps, that degree of inner peace can only come from God. The difference is important, for the basic kind is fine when you are "fat and happy" but when you are not, you need something more. The peace found in human philosophy fails when confronted with harsh realties like death and other horrors we find in this world.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by bobbins, posted 07-06-2005 11:32 PM bobbins has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by RickJB, posted 06-30-2006 10:12 AM wmscott has not replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 15 of 300 (222428)
07-07-2005 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by robinrohan
07-06-2005 11:37 PM


Re: There is no such thing
Dear robinrohan;
There is no inner peace, just as there is no outer peace. And anyway, what matters is the Truth, not peace.
It is knowing the Truth (and acting on it), that gives peace. No peace is possible without Truth, lies and deceptions always bring trouble. (John 8:32) "YOU will know the truth, and the truth will set YOU free." It is only by knowing the Truth that we can gain freedom from not just injustice and violence, but from sin and death as well. Once the Truth has set you free, then you will know peace.
Truth is what the Bible is all about, and Jesus is the truth.
(John 14:6) "Jesus said to him: "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
But it is not just a matter of accepting Jesus and everything is great, we have to worship with spirit and truth, our worship must conform to biblical requirements to be acceptable.
(John 4:23-24) "Nevertheless, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the true worshipers will worship the Father with spirit and truth, for, indeed, the Father is looking for suchlike ones to worship him. God is a Spirit, and those worshiping him must worship with spirit and truth."
There is no peace in the world because it doesn't know truth.
(John 14:17) "the spirit of the truth, which the world cannot receive, because it neither beholds it nor knows it. YOU know it, because it remains with YOU and is in YOU."
If we are for Truth, we will follow Christ.
(John 18:37) "Everyone that is on the side of the truth listens to my voice."
It is God's will that everyone learn the Truth, the way is open for everyone.
(1 Timothy 2:3-4) "This is fine and acceptable in the sight of our Savior, God, whose will is that all sorts of men should be saved and come to an accurate knowledge of truth."
I would be happy to help you to learn about the Truth. My e-mail address is in my profile.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by robinrohan, posted 07-06-2005 11:37 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by CK, posted 07-07-2005 6:58 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 20 by robinrohan, posted 07-07-2005 9:16 PM wmscott has not replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 16 of 300 (222429)
07-07-2005 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by mikehager
07-07-2005 12:18 PM


Re: Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
Dear mikehager;
It is the height of arrogance to claim that inner peace, which I take to mean a sense of well being and general fulfillment, is only possible via belief in a given mythology.
All of the positive effects you cite could just as easily be available to any person with a positive outlook on life. That's all fine, but where you fall is where many theists fall; by assuming that the way they think they achieved a sense of "inner peace" is the only way to do so. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I am an atheist with a job I like, hobbies I enjoy, friends I care about and a family I love. I'm doing pretty good. I am quite fullfilled. Your claim that "true peace" can only be found the way YOU did, by YOUR beliefs is false and the height of shamefull vanity.
Yes I am guilty of the most annoying form of arrogance, that of being right, don't you just hate that kind. Yes I agree that even atheists can have inner peace, of a basic sort. In talking about inner peace, and true inner peace, I am talking about degrees of peace and types of inner peace. The basic kind is just being at peace with yourself, a deeper inner peace would be being at peace with yourself and with God while true or real inner peace in the perfect sense would be the peace that comes from God by the holy spirit. That is the kind of peace Jehovah's Witnesses displayed in the concentration camps, that degree of inner peace can only come from God. The difference is important, for the basic kind is fine when you are "fat and happy" but when you are not, you need something more. The peace found in human philosophy fails when confronted with harsh realties like death and other horrors we find in this world.
The fact that your peace comes from friends & family, indicates that your peace is dependant on them, that if you were to lose them you would lose your peace as well. In truly bad times, you would have nothing to carry you through. A true inner peace is not dependant on such things, and gives one a strength to deal with difficulties that you can't even imagine. For any coming storm, you are unprepared to deal with it. Human ideals are fine good times, but when the bad times come, they fall short. You should rethink your approach to life, for one thing I have learned, you can count on trouble coming your way soon or later. It pays to be ready for it.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by mikehager, posted 07-07-2005 12:18 PM mikehager has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by CK, posted 07-07-2005 7:07 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 21 by mikehager, posted 07-07-2005 9:39 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 25 by Rahvin, posted 07-08-2005 2:54 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 27 of 300 (222666)
07-08-2005 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by GDR
07-07-2005 1:53 PM


What the peace from God is.
Dear GDR;
As a Christian I find that some days I have what I guess you could call inner peace, and some days my gut is tied up in knots.
I also have very little doubt that there are adherents of other faiths including Atheism that have more inner peace than I do. I think it has more to do with my personality type.
The reason for that is simple, you have not received the peace of God. The peace of God or true inner peace, is a comforting power that protects you from stress and helps you cope with things. (Philippians 4:7) "the peace of God that excels all thought will guard YOUR hearts and YOUR mental powers by means of Christ Jesus." It is not dependant on personality or the comfort level of your lifestyle, what it is dependant on is really believing and practicing what we believe in our lives.(Romans 8:6-7) "but the minding of the spirit means life and peace; because the minding of the flesh means enmity" It doesn't matter what you believe if you don't live it in your life.
We must also have faith to receive peace from God.
(Romans 5:1) "Therefore, now that we have been declared righteous as a result of faith, let us enjoy peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,"
(Romans 15:13) "May the God who gives hope fill YOU with all joy and peace by YOUR believing, that YOU may abound in hope with power of holy spirit."
But even the most ardent followers of many christian religions will not receive the gift of peace from God.
(2 Timothy 3:1-5) "But know this, that in the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here. For men will be . . . having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power;"
The reason is that their form of devotion is without power or God's approval, because they have turned away from following the Truth in God's Word. It is necessary to worship God in truth, following the biblical teachings found in scriptures, to receive peace from God. (Philippians 4:9) "The things that YOU learned as well as accepted and heard and saw in connection with me, practice these; and the God of peace will be with you."
By learning more about God and what he wants of us, and living by that knowledge, that we come in line to receive peace from God. Even once we have found the Truth, we can deepen our inner peace from God by learning more about God and drawing ever closer to him.
(2 Peter 1:2) "May undeserved kindness and peace be increased to YOU by an accurate knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord,"
Once you have peace from God, there is nothing that can take it away from you, as long as you remain faithful, God's peace will always be with you to carry you through whatever the world may throw at you.
(2 John 2-3) "because of the truth that remains in us, and it will be with us forever. There will be with us undeserved kindness, mercy [and] peace from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Son of the Father, with truth and love."
I urge you to look for the peace of God, for without it, you have not yet found the kingdom of God. (Romans 14:17) "For the kingdom of God does not mean eating and drinking, but [means] righteousness and peace"
I would like to help you to receive God's peace. Please feel free to E-mail me, my address is in my profile, or we can talk on the board too.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by GDR, posted 07-07-2005 1:53 PM GDR has not replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 28 of 300 (222668)
07-08-2005 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by crashfrog
07-07-2005 6:46 PM


How can you need something that never existed?
Dear Crashfrog;
What makes you think you can't have peace as an atheist? I'm way more peaceful inside now that I'm an atheist than I ever was as a Christian.
Doesn't surprise me, I feel so sorry for members of christian religions that don't follow what the Bible teaches. The harder they try to follow what they are taught, the more miserable their lives are. Finally they learn to say but not do, to avoid some of the hardship. These religions act like vast hypocrite factories, turning out huge numbers of people they have be taught to say one thing but in practice, to do another. Some people seeing all of this going on around them, just reject the whole horrible mess and become atheists, so no I am not surprised that you are more at peace now, then before. One of the purposes behind having counterfeit christianity is to turn people off from serving God or to convince them there is no God. After all, how could any God approve or even just tolerate what many christian religions have done. Most of this planet's wars and many of it's problems are caused by 'christian' religions.
So I do agree with you on some things, of course I differ in that while we both agree about religions in general, I know that out of all the many religions out there, there is one that is the Truth. It is possible that the only important difference between us is that I found it and you haven't, yet.
As for not needing to find God to find peace, yes of course for the basic kind of peace that is true, but I am talking about the Peace from God, true inner peace. That kind of peace comes only from God, the fact that we long for that kind of peace, argues for God's existence. See my post above to GDR if you want to learn more about what peace from God is. As humans we desperately want to be able to face life with a deep sense of serenity that can weather all the storms that can come our way. Being accepting about dying doesn't help much when you aren't the one that is dying, seeing loved ones die tends to blow any comfort from that kind of thinking away. All other kinds of inner peace have their limits, it is only the peace from God that will stand up under all tests.
People who have peace from God are able to cope with extreme adversity, and are looked up to as being a worthy example of how to deal with life. Who doesn't admire people with that kind of character? When asked they will tell you that they owe their peace to God. The fact that they have this quality and those who don't wish they had it too, tells us something. The peace from God is like a missing component, we have an empty socket for it in our mind, we feel incomplete without it, those who don't have it try to use substitutions for it. Humans are incomplete without God, we need his guidance, we unsuccessfully try to fill the void with human philosophy. We were never designed to go it alone, we can't even govern ourselves well. Watching the human race is like watching squabbling children in a sandbox. Only the earth is our sandbox and the children have nuclear weapons and are destroying their sandbox at an ever increasing rate. It is inarguable that we have a real need for God. The need does imply existence, for how can you need something that never existed.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by crashfrog, posted 07-07-2005 6:46 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Rahvin, posted 07-08-2005 5:53 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 31 by Rahvin, posted 07-08-2005 5:59 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 32 by crashfrog, posted 07-08-2005 7:05 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 36 of 300 (222786)
07-09-2005 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Rahvin
07-08-2005 2:54 PM


Re: Are there any substitutes for having inner peace?
Dear Rahvin;
wmscott, you are indeed guilty of the most annoying form of arrogance - deciding you are right and that everyone else is wrong, just because you said so.
If that was the case, I would indeed be guilty of being very arrogant. To base one's view of what is true merely on your own opinion, is self deception and foolish in the extreme. My religious views are all based on scripture, not creed or opinion. We can argue over interpretations of scripture, but we will need to be very specific and go over each point one by one. I have had many discussions on the board on some points, so feel free to check my message index and see what I have already posted on different points. So decide which point you wish to debate and I will be happy to show you scripturally why I believe it. But since you don't accept the Bible as the being our guide in this matter, we should probably start with how to prove that it is from God.
Quantify your "degrees of peace." How does one measure such a subjective concept? It is impossible. You cannot logically state that the amount of "inner peace" you feel that you attribute to your religion is any more or less than that felt by an atheist.
Yes measuring or comparing the subjective is a problem here. To simplify, for this thread I am using the concept of three levels of inner peace, 1st a general sense of well being, 2d: a deeper inner peace that is not dependant things being nice, 3d: the peace from God, an inner peace that is unbreakable. Very arbitrary, but we do need some qualification of what we are talking about.
Measuring one's level of inner peace is very subjective, but the type of peace can be inferred by how a person describes it and what they attribute it to. If some one states that they have inner peace because they have a nice life, that is what I would call type 1 general inner peace. If they say that they have an inner peace that is not dependant on things being nice, that is 2 or maybe even three. Now since 3 or peace from God, is from God, only God can say for sure. But we can look for evidence such as a person's having weathered horrible events and maintaining a peaceful outlook.
A person can feel at peace from such mundane things as being an honorable, trustworthy, moral person. A person can feel at peace by raising children to be good and productive members of society. A person can be at peace by accepting the things they cannot change, and working to change those they can for the better. None of these things require a belief in God. These sources of inner peace can also not be destroyed - if you take away the child, the parent still knows that they raised a good and decent person. If you take away a persons ability to change the world, they still have the knowledge that they tried to leave the world a better place than it was before.
Sure, any one can have these minor sources of inner peace without God. But you are also terribly wrong here as this kind of inner peace is destroyed all too easily. "if you take away the child, the parent still knows that they raised a good and decent person." So the poor kid dies a horrible senseless death, and the parent doesn't lose their sense of inner peace because they know they did a good job raising the kid? Gone forever for no reason, and the parent just accepts this and deals with it. This may work on paper but not in the real world. Did you forget about Love? Parents love their children, and the death of a child is one of the hardest loses anyone ever has to face. Trying to console one's self with "well I know I was a good parent" is about as comforting as that stupid line you used to hear "God needed another little angel". Nether line does nothing about filling the huge hole in your heart. There is only one thing that can, and that is hope, hope of the resurrection, that one day you will see your child again. The peace from God in this case gives you complete confidence that God will one day raise your child. It is hope based on your total trust in God. Then there is also the comfort of prayer, and of reading the verses in the Bible about the resurrection. Just ignore for a moment about whether nor not you think it is real, which is more comforting, the kids gone but I was a good parent, or I know that I will see my kid again in the resurrection? Your whole premise of finding comfort in thinking that you did what you could, seems dependant on not really caring, of just forgetting about it and being able to let go. For people who really care, such thinking is nearly worthless, it may help with reducing guilt, but for real emotional lost, it doesn't work since a parent who really loved his child can never let go or forget. True love is forever and the love between a parent and a child is one of deepest loves that there is. A loving parent even with the hope of the resurrection, always misses their child and thinks of them everyday. It is a horrible lost, but the hope of the resurrection and the peace of God helps you focus on the future and helps you cope with your lost. You pray a lot and God carries you through. In short you still love and remember your child instead of trying to forget and put it behind you, which is not dealing with it, that is just trying to bury it.
God does not have a monopoly on the concept of Hope. God is not the sole source of a sense of self-worth. . . . The fact that you believe that God gives a greater sense of peace does not make it true for anyone else.
OEM is the best. Yes God does have a monopoly on the hope of life after death. Who has greater peace, the man who accepts death or the man who knows God will bring him back from the dead? For those who believe in the resurrection, death is like falling asleep until God wakes you. For the person without that hope, death is a one way door to nowhere, to be ok with that you really have to not care. If you love life, how can you be ok about losing it and never getting it back? When someone puts a gun to your head, it really focuses your thinking and a lot of nonsense you have believed in just evaporates. I don't think just accepting death will cut it then for most people, probably just leave you with panic. I am sure that it worked for some, but considering the way our minds work, it is a very difficult thing to do. Few people have that much detachment from life. Just look at the difference, the contented atheist has to let go of life forever while the theist loves life and looks forward to coming back to life. The theist has hope, the atheist has nothing. The contented atheist outlook isn't very healthy for your mind since it is so bleak. I have heard it said that the one thing man can not live without is hope, the contented atheist would disprove that, if having no hope can said be said to be living for in a way they have already died in their heart.
[The peace found in human philosophy fails when confronted with harsh realties like death and other horrors we find in this world.]- Prove it. Countless atheists and people of other faiths around the world live through greater deprivation and horror than you or I could ever dream of without losing hope, without giving up, and without losing their inner peace. Without the Judeo-Christian God.
First I was speaking about human philosophy without believing in God, people of non-Christian religions are still theists. But non-Christian religions do have a greater difficulty dealing with the issue of death and it is only in the Bible that we find satisfying answers to our spiritual questions, like why does God permit evil? Why do we die? etc. Without real answers, or real hope, they have far less foundation for maintaining inner peace when faced with calamity in comparison with what is found in God's Word.
Second, I was speaking in general terms about the philosophy itself. The philosophy of men falls apart when up against the problems of the world. If the philosophy of men was up to the task, we would have solved our problems by now, but we haven't and we can't. Without God we have no hope. What hope does a godless philosophy offer the parent of a dead child? What comfort for their grief? The fact that some can embrace dying doesn't do any good for the rest of us who love life and want to go on living. As for people not giving up hope, what hope does an atheist have? If he buys it, it is over.
Again, prove it. You seem to subscribe to the old saying "there are no atheists in foxholes." I suggest you look to the number of atheists currently active in the US armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, facing greater horrors than you or I will ever be forced to, surrounded on all sides by people who want to convert or kill them, and yet still remain strong and do what they need to do.
Being in a foxhole under bombardment, a soldier is faced with nearly certain death, and is convinced he is about to die, under those conditions people become religious nearly to the last man. A tour of duty in Iraq is in comparison a cake walk, few would go if they viewed it as a death sentence. While not as stressful as certain death, I would expect that under the stress an increase in religiousness including some former atheists.
Here is what the US army states on the subject.
3-6. Increased Religious Faith
It is probably an exaggeration to say that there are "no atheists in the foxhole," but many soldiers and civilians do find that danger, and especially the unpredictable danger of modern war, stimulates a new or stronger need for faith in God.
http://www.bragg.army.mil/528CSC/FM22-51Ch3.htm
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson
This message has been edited by wmscott, 07-11-2005 05:28 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Rahvin, posted 07-08-2005 2:54 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by CK, posted 07-09-2005 9:22 AM wmscott has not replied
 Message 41 by Firebird, posted 07-11-2005 6:11 PM wmscott has replied
 Message 43 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 6:20 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 39 of 300 (223198)
07-11-2005 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by crashfrog
07-08-2005 7:05 PM


Your peace is one of death, mine is of hope,
Dear crashfrog;
I was a member of a church that followed what the Bible taught.
The only religion today that really follows the Bible is Jehovah's Witnesses. Were you once a Witness? Were you baptized? and were you disfellowshipped?
But that's the kind that I have. True inner peace, but it doesn't come from God.
Then it is not True inner peace if it doesn't come from God. You can find inner peace without God, but it is only a relative type of peace. Like outer peace, peace or the absence of war, is not true peace. True peace is when you know that there will never be another war and there is no conflict at all nor the prospect of any. Merely accepting what appears to be your fate can give you a sense of inner peace, but it is not True inner peace. It is like you are in a crowded burning building with no way out, you sit down and feel peaceful because you accept that you are going to die, while I after finding an exit, feel real inner peace knowing I will be able to escape the fire. Your peace is one of death, mine is of hope, that is why I say your peace isn't true or real.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by crashfrog, posted 07-08-2005 7:05 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by robinrohan, posted 07-11-2005 6:19 PM wmscott has not replied
 Message 45 by crashfrog, posted 07-11-2005 6:23 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 40 of 300 (223199)
07-11-2005 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by sidelined
07-09-2005 3:10 AM


Reality-the quality or state of being real.
Dear Sidelined;
[I have logically proved it as being real and you can do the same. Accepting nonexistence if it were truly the only possibility would be realistic, but it is not a hope or even healthy for your mind]- No doubt this will open a can of worms,however,I will bet that you cannot prove this logically as being real.I will bet that you are not capable of explaining what reality is much less prove the existence of your worldview.Consider this a challenge to take up here or,if necessary,in another thread.
Reality-the quality or state of being real.
Since the religious part of my world view is founded on the Bible, the first step in logically proving that what I believe in is real, is to prove that the Bible is the inspired word of God. In this discussion, it should be merely necessary to prove that the Bible contains elements that could not have been of human origin to prove it as having a supernatural source. Do you agree that would be sufficient? Once that is accomplished, and if you are willing to accept that fact into your worldview, then we can use the Bible as an authoritative reference to systematically prove what I believe in. I do find that while nearly everyone claims to be very logical in their reasons for what they believe, in actual practice, they believe what they want. I find that this applies to nearly everyone and I sometimes catch myself doing this too despite my best efforts to avoid such silly nonsense. So try to keep an open mind, I do.
First let us consider what the Bible is not by a brief comparison to the Book Of Mormon. The BOM has no historical background, there is no BOM archeology any more than there is Oz archeology. Shortly after the BOM was published, numerous historical errors were pointed out that clearly revealed the book to be a complete fraud. DNA studies have also conclusively proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the Jewish migration to the Americas described in the BOM, never occurred. Repeatedly the BOM has over and over again been completely discredited as being historically true, and there has never been presented any historical evidence that clearly supported any of the events as having taken place. That is what a complete fraud looks and smells like.
Now in the case of the Bible, the places described are real and many of the historical events described are attested to by historians and archeology. Disputes over biblical history are focused on details or certain parts, the over all history described in the Bible is known to be factual and is not questioned as is the case with the BOM. As for the disputes, our knowledge of ancient events is not total, so omission is not in itself evidence for non occurrence and sometimes ancient historians maybe in error on some points. Since total historical accuracy is not essential to proving my argument, it is enough at this point to say that the Bible is a historical book relating real events that for the most part are accepted as having occurred.
Then there is the great age of the Bible which is frequently stated to be the oldest of all the major religious books. Much of the history recorded was written by eye witness of the events. Some critics claim some portions were written later then stated, but there little to support such claims so there is no real reason that things were not written as claimed. But this is again a side point to our discussion.
My last side point I want to mention, is that the Bible is literature, it is well written. Most ancient religious books are not. Even the books are not part of the Word of God that some tried to add the Bible, are from what I have seen, of a noticeably lower writing caliber, like someone tried to slip a few pages of a comic book into a well written book. The power and beauty contained in the pages of the Bible are breath taking and is universally acknowledged. Whatever the Bible is, it is something to be taken seriously, it is not some obvious fraud like the BOM. In short, the Bible has all the markings of what it claims to be, there are no obvious errors like the BOM to discredit it. To decide whether or not the Bible is actually inspired requires a detailed investigation, those who have made a decision one way or the other without doing so, do not know what they are talking about. Many have done this and such opinions favorable or not, are of course of no value since they are not based on the evidence. Considering how important the Bible's claim of being the word of God is, it is an issue that each person should really consider the evidence in detail for themselves to make their own informed discission rather than taking the word of others. So any brief account of the evidence I can provide here, can only be a starting point for such a study. So rather than attempting to conclusively cover everything, I will cover a few key highlights that should be enough show that there is evidence of supernatural influence in the writing of the Bible.
The most obvious point and also the most frequently cited, is that the Bible contains very specific prophecies that were fulfilled right down to the last detail. Not the broad open ended vague to the point of being meaningless type that can be twisted by anyone to mean anything, but prophecies that are so clear and accurate that critics try to claim they were written after the events since even they know that no man could have written them on their own. The problem with the critics claim is the evidence shows the books like Daniel were written when stated [Ezekiel was a prophet in Jerusalem at the same time Daniel was in Babylon and refers to Daniel several times by name. (Ezekiel 14:14, 20; 28:3)], and Daniel contains prophecies that reach down to our day and beyond anyway.
In Daniel is found the prophecy of seventy weeks of years, (Daniel 9:25-27) "from the going forth of [the] word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah [the] Leader, there will be seven weeks, also sixty-two weeks. She will return and be actually rebuilt, with a public square and moat, but in the straits of the times. "And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah will be cut off, with nothing for himself. "And the city and the holy place the people of a leader that is coming will bring to their ruin. And the end of it will be by the flood. And until [the] end there will be war; what is decided upon is desolations. "And he must keep [the] covenant in force for the many for one week; and at the half of the week he will cause sacrifice and gift offering to cease." First the prophecy predicts the rebuilding of Jerusalem, and from the time of the word or command to rebuild the city, there would be a time period 69 weeks of years or 483 years until the Messiah would appear, in the year 29 AD. The Jews of the first century understood this prophecy and were expecting the Messiah to appear in that year. (Luke 3:15) "Now as the people were in expectation and all were reasoning in their hearts about John: "May he perhaps be the Christ?" After the appearance of the Messiah there is the last week of the 70 weeks, in the middle of that week, or after three and half years after he appeared as Messiah, the Messiah would be 'cut off' which is an OT reference to being executed. That is of course exactly what happened, Jesus was executed after a three and half year ministry. At that time he stopped the need for sacrifices by his which was what they had all pictured, the reality replaced the symbolic. Then after his death, the covenant is still keep in force for another half week of years, or three and half years. This covenant in the prophecy is one week of years long, 7 years, and ran from the start of Jesus' ministry until three and half years after his death. This covenant was for the Jews, that because of their special position, Jesus preached only to the Jews and those associated with the Jewish faith, and this continued until Cornelius the first Gentile to accept Jesus as the Messiah.
This prophecy by itself is enough to prove a supernatural influence in the writing of the Bible, and yet it is only one of many prophecies found in the book of Daniel, and Daniel is but one of the many prophetic books of the Bible. Jesus literally fulfilled hundreds of OT prophecies, many of them concerned specific details like which city he was to born in, etc. No man could have known these details in advance, yet over and over again in the Bible we find these fantastic prophecies made long in advance being fulfilled in exact detail, and not just by some kind of long shot chance since there are no misses. If humans were doing the guessing, we would expect a huge number of guesses, with perhaps a few getting a hit once in a while. But somehow the prophecies in the Bible have this amazing accuracy.
Another point I would like to use to show that the Bible is the word of God, is not commonly used probably because it takes some understanding to see it, but I would like to give it a try. In the Bible there is an interconnectedness, prophecies, phrases and words found in one book of the Bible have a connection with another book of the Bible. Like with the prophecies of the messiah, they are not all in the book of Daniel, they are found throughout the OT, and they all converge. It is like having a bunch of people shooting at a target from different angles and all hitting it, but they can't see the target because it is in the future, and they don't know each other because they are shooting from different times in the past and they didn't even know what the target was or were or when it would be in most cases. Yet some how they all hit the target. It is not just convergence of biblical prophecies that ties the books together, phrases and terms used in one book are defined by another, like one writer explaining a term or prophet phrase that another writer will use hundreds of years later in another book. (Genesis 3:14-15) "And Jehovah God proceeded to say to the serpent: . . . And I shall put enmity between you and the woman and between your seed and her seed. He will bruise you in the head and you will bruise him in the heel." Today we know that the serpent is the Devil and his seed is those who follow him, the woman is God's heavenly organization and the woman's seed is Jesus Christ. The prophecy finds it's fulfillment in Christ's dying a temporary death, the heel wound, and the serpents head burse will be fulfilled with the coming execution of the Devil. How did Moses or anyone else know to write this? It ties right in with what John wrote at Revelation 12:1-5 "And a great sign was seen in heaven, a woman arrayed with the sun, and the moon was beneath her feet, and on her head was a crown of twelve stars, and she was pregnant. And she cries out in her pains and in her agony to give birth. And another sign was seen in heaven, and, look! a great fiery-colored dragon, with seven heads and ten horns and upon its heads seven diadems; and its tail drags a third of the stars of heaven, and it hurled them down to the earth. And the dragon kept standing before the woman who was about to give birth, that, when she did give birth, it might devour her child. And she gave birth to a son, a male, who is to shepherd all the nations with an iron rod. And her child was caught away to God and to his throne." I will not go into all the details, the stars are angels by the way, but you can see the parallelism between the two prophecies. John's was written after Jesus' death and has fulfillment in our time period and beyond. From Genesis to Revelation there is this interconnectedness of what is in one book shedding light on what is said in another, basically like someone took the pieces of a puzzle and scattered them throughout the pages of Bible. Each single piece doesn't mean much by itself and the writer probably didn't understand it just as you probably don't understand much of that above quote from Revelation, (Daniel 12:8-9) "Now as for me, I heard, but I could not understand; so that I said: "O my lord, what will be the final part of these things?" And he went on to say: "Go, Daniel, because the words are made secret and sealed up until the time of [the] end." because each prophet and/or writer was given only one or just a few pieces of the puzzle, they could not deduce the whole, so they had no knowledge of how what they wrote would fit in with what would be written later and how all it would all come together. So no human could have engineered this, it required an intelligence that knew what was going to happen in the future, and was in existence over the whole time span the prophecies were recorded and was able to inspire the Bible writers with what they need to write. Once you can see this pattern in the Bible for yourself, it is a convincing proof of God, but to see it takes a thorough study of the Bible.
This post as long as it is, was only meant to give you an idea of how the Bible gives amble proof of it's being inspired by God and of God's existence. To pursue this further, to be able to see this for yourself, I would recommend reading the following books.
A Bible along with the following:
"Pay Attention to Daniel's Prophecy!" For a verse by verse study of Daniel and it's prophecies.
"The BibleGod's Word or Man's?" Evidence that the Bible is inspired.
Both books are published by Jehovah's Witnesses and are not for sale anywhere, but instead are available without cost from Jehovah's Witnesses. Whom getting in touch with, should not be a problem. Just ask for the book or books by name and they will arrange for you to get a copy. If there are no local Witnesses in your area, you can try on the web at http://www.watchtower.org/ or you can e-mail me and I will see what I can do.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2005 3:10 AM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 7:01 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 50 of 300 (223668)
07-13-2005 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Firebird
07-11-2005 6:11 PM


Ask her yourself and find out.
Dear Firebird;
My sister-in-law is a JW; the only one in the family. Are you seriously suggesting that she has this True (since you capitalised it) inner peace, believing that an imminent Armageddon will bring eternal death to her husband, children and parents?
Ask her yourself and find out, besides you really should spend some time with your brother and his wife. A Witness always keeps the door of hope open, hopefully her husband, children and parents will listen before it is too late. Our peace from God enables us to cope with difficult situations and we always trust God to be merciful and to be a perfect judge of what is in a person's heart. We also do not decide who will or will not survive Armageddon, that is for God to decide, we can't say one way or the other whether a specific non-Witness (or Witness for that matter) will survive Armageddon. Also we are not just concerned about our just our own family, we are concerned about everyone, it is our endeavor to preach the Good News of the Kingdom to everyone so that everyone has the opportunity of choosing to serve God. But we also realize that since Jesus said (Matthew 7:13-14) "Go in through the narrow gate; because broad and spacious is the road leading off into destruction, and many are the ones going in through it; whereas narrow is the gate and cramped the road leading off into life, and few are the ones finding it." most people will reject God and die at Armageddon. We still have True inner peace just like Noah did when he knew what was coming upon the world of his day. We know God is righteous and have total trust in his judgement, only those who should die at Armageddon, will die. We don't fear Armageddon, we look forward to it. (Luke 21:9-28) "For these things must occur first, but the end does not [occur] immediately . . . But as these things start to occur, raise yourselves erect and lift YOUR heads up, because YOUR deliverance is getting near." Armageddon is not just the destruction of the wicked, it is the deliverance of the righteous. It is a wonderful hope, the coming establishment of the Messianic Kingdom on earth.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Firebird, posted 07-11-2005 6:11 PM Firebird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Firebird, posted 07-13-2005 11:27 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 51 of 300 (223670)
07-13-2005 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by crashfrog
07-11-2005 6:23 PM


Re: Your peace is one of death, mine is of hope,
Dear Crashfrog;
[The only religion today that really follows the Bible is Jehovah's Witnesses.]- I'm sorry, but you're mistaken.
Prove it. I have never found another religion that truly follows the Bible, if you know of one, I would really like to hear about.
Since I have true inner peace, and it did not come from God, you must be mistaken.
I don't think you have ever had true inner peace, so you don't have anything to compare yours with and as a result don't know what you are talking about. Read my post to Rahvin on the measure of True inner peace, and tell me that is the kind of peace that you have.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by crashfrog, posted 07-11-2005 6:23 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by crashfrog, posted 07-13-2005 9:27 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 52 of 300 (223674)
07-13-2005 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Rahvin
07-11-2005 6:20 PM


The measure of True inner peace
Dear Rahvin;
But to say that "hope of the resurrection" is the ONLY source of comfort and hope is horribly bigoted and arrogant. A Hindu would draw comfort and hope from the belief that their child will be reincarnated, perhaps into a better life. And it is still valid to say that an atheist could take pride in the way they raised their child, and be at peace with the life their child was able to lead. I'm not saying that it doesn't hurt like hell, and I'm not saying that it ever goes away. I am saying that a person can remain strong and retain a positive outlook on life and a sense of inner peace despite that pain. . . . Atheists lose children just as often as Christians, it hits them just as hard, and I doubt you can show that every one of them loses their sense of inner peace any more than a Christian does.
The hope of the resurrection is the only hope of seeing your dead loved one again, reincarnation doesn't offer that hope. Reincarnation is a poor sort of hope anyway, since even if there was any truth in it, the person has no memory of their past life, the mind is wiped clean. If that happened, the person is gone, reincarnation of a vegetable, would be the result. For without what is in our minds that makes us who we are, we would be nothing, brain dead. The hope of the resurrection is the only real hope, non-Christian religions have nothing in comparison and their explanations for evil and other things fall just as short. Most importantly of course, is that fact that man made religions have make believe hope, since it isn't from Jehovah God.
Yes an atheist could at least take pride about having raised their child, but they have no hope at all, just bleak acceptance. Perhaps some atheists do manage to maintain a positive outlook on life after such a lost, but they have to do it without any hope. Those who do, are a testimony to their personal strength, not to the strength of the philosophy of atheism. There is no comfort or real inner peace (the kind built on hope) in atheism. As a group, I would expect that those who have real faith in the resurrection cope far better then a group of atheists. I have seen a very marked difference between Jehovah's Witnesses everyone else in coping with the lost of a loved one in death, ours is a measured grief, like the child has been whisked away to a far country without our consent, but we know he will return to us in time. While for others, the grief is total.
I have personally known several atheists who are more moral, more caring, more genuine, more emotionally stable, and mentally stronger than nearly all of the Christians I have known. My experiences would tend to disprove your assumption that all atheists are hopeless and dead inside.
And what hope does an atheist have in the face of death? If they have no hope, then they are hopeless, if they have accepted death then they are in a way already dead inside.
Most christians are such in name only as you know already, hypocrites are never at peace, and since most christian religions follow the word of man rather than the Word of God, they are a poor example anyway.
Many people have read the Bible and concluded that it did NOT, in fact, provide satisfactory answers. To say that the Bible is the ONLY source of satisfactory answers is not only foolhardy, but bigoted against other religions beyond belief.
Reading something is not a guarantee of comprehending it. (Acts 8:30-31)" "Do you actually know what you are reading?" He said: "Really, how could I ever do so, unless someone guided me?"" It takes a thorough study of the Bible to find the answers to these questions, a person just reading it on their own, would be unlikely to the answers on their own. Which is why Jehovah's Witnesses offer to study the Bible free of charge with anyone who would like find them. We also offer Bible study books free to people who would like to read them and learn these things. So the fact that some have looked into the Bible and not found any answers doesn't mean that they are not there. If you want to know what they are, like why does god permit wickedness?; I would be happy to show it to you from the Bible. And in actually going door to door, and talking to people of other religions, I can tell you that they do not have satisfying answers to these questions.
We had THOUSANDS OF YEARS under the philosophies of religion and achieved NOTHING. Please note the Dark Ages, a period in which the Catholic Church enforced a Theocracy across all of Europe. Ever hear of the Inquisition? Yes, religion worked very well for us there. Or how about Afghanistan? The depravities of the Taliban were and still are done in the name of faith. Secular societies have only recently arisen, and in that time we have sent probes to the outer regions of the solar system, cured countless diseases, and improved the quality of life for BILLIONS of human beings. I'd say the "philosophies of men" have held up pretty well through some of the darkest periods of history, and advanced the entire human species.
We had THOUSANDS OF YEARS under the philosophies of false religion. Jesus warned, (Matthew 7:15-20) "Be on the watch for the false prophets that come to YOU in sheep's covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves. By their fruits YOU will recognize them. Never do people gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles, do they? Likewise every good tree produces fine fruit, but every rotten tree produces worthless fruit; a good tree cannot bear worthless fruit, neither can a rotten tree produce fine fruit. Every tree not producing fine fruit gets cut down and thrown into the fire. Really, then, by their fruits YOU will recognize those [men]." when a religion does evil things, it shows itself to be evil. Christ said of such people, (Matthew 7:22-23) "Many will say to me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?' And yet then I will confess to them: I never knew YOU! Get away from me, YOU workers of lawlessness." all religions that produce bad fruit are not true followers of Christ. It is easy to spot these false religions by their long histories of evil deeds and by the fact that what they teach is in conflict with what Jesus taught. Jesus taught his followers to be no part of the world, to be peaceable towards all men, loving them as they would love themselves.
The scientific advancement of our day is very impressive, but what good is it without moral advancement? We make better medicines, but we make better weapons too. I am all in favor of science, but it is only a tool, a way of finding better ways of doing things. It doesn't give us morals to live by or answer the questions that are in our heart, because science is about how, not why.
If you wish to tout secular societies, why not consider the former USSR? Surely as an atheistic society it was the best of all countries in which to live. (LOL)
You're arguing as if you had already proven that the strongest sense of peace comes only from God. Then you say that only God can say for sure — if we mere humans can't possibly know, then why ask the question to other mere humans?. . . But you have failed to prove that an Atheist or person of a non-Judeo-Christian faith cannot have a sense of inner peace that is just as strong as the peace that can be attained through faith in God. Please provide evidence for your argument. . . . If you would like to debate whether Atheists and non-Judeo-Christians can have a sense of inner peace just as strong as the peace Judeao-Christians draw from their faith in God, then please provide evidence to back up your claims.
As I mentioned before, it is hard to measure some one's inner peace, and how do you tell if his inner peace is unbreakable? The answer of course is simple, you see if can be broken. Now I am claiming that Jehovah God, the God of the Bible and the God of Jesus (John 20:17) and Abraham, gives his true followers an unbreakable inner peace. I am also claiming that only Jehovah's Witnesses are true follows of Jehovah God and his son Christ Jesus, and they are the only ones who have been given the unbreakable peace from God.
To test this assertion, one would need to round up a large number of Jehovah's Witnesses and subject them years of imprisonment with harsh treatment, torture, starvation and surround them with death and the threat of death. You would also set it up, so that all they have to do is sign a paper renouncing their faith, and they can walk out the door free. You would also show them you mean business by executing some of those who have refused to sign. Maximum phycological pressure would be applied, if our inner peace is truly unbreakable, you would expect the majority or at least a substantial percentage to be able to hold on to their inner peace as demonstrated by their keeping their faith by refusing to renounce it despite all hardship.
As evil and demonic as this thought experiment sounds, it has all ready been done, in Germany durning the second world war. Jehovah's Witnesses obeying God first, and man second, refused to break God's laws and serve in Hitler's armies or to give any support to the evil actions of the Nazi political party and remained neutral. The Nazi's viewed Jehovah's Witnesses as a direct idealogical threat and did everything in their power to root them out and destroy them. They didn't want to just kill them, they wanted to destroy them ideologically, they needed to discredit them by breaking them and making them renounce their faith. The full power of the Nazi war machine was turned on a small religious group who preached peace and merely wanted to be left alone. Would the True inner peace from God that Jehovah's Witnesses have received, fail? Here is what happened.
their faith held firm and there were few who were willing to sign [169] the paper denying the movement and thus buying their freedom. Theological principles were adhered to; Witnesses remained 'neutrals, they were honest and completely trustworthy and as such, ironically, often found themselves employed as servants of the S.S. One S.S. officer commented that only a Jehovah's Witness could be trusted to shave his master with a cut throat razor without wielding the razor to most violent ends.
Against all odds, Witnesses in the camps met and prayed together, produced literature and made converts. Sustained by their fellowship, and, unlike many other prisoners, well aware of the reasons why such places existed and why they should suffer thus, Witnesses proved a small but memorable band of prisoners, marked by the violet triangle and noted for their courage and their convictions.
In the camps they experienced the ultimate test of their faith, as 'witnesses' to Jehovah. It was adherence to their faith that kept many of them in camps, away from their families, suffering the privation and bestial conditions designed to break their spirit and reveal the strength and inevitability of the National Socialist cause in the face of all opposition. It was here, if anywhere, that survival strategies which put the keeping of the faith before the safety or even life of an adherent, were to meet their severest test. It is clear that the Witnesses found their principles stayed firm, their world-view confirmed rather than perverted, and their personal survival, in the face of God's plan, irrelevant. Some 10,000 were imprisoned, and together they received sentences totalling 20,000 years. One out of every two German Witnesses was imprisoned, one in four lost their lives. Nevertheless the work continued. The details of daily life in the concentration [170] camps illustrates yet again the real basis of the conflict between the Nazis and these sectarians. Witnesses were unswerving, refusing compromise, unrepentant and totally convinced that the Nazi system was doomed. Not even the fact that they made good and trustworthy servants could save them from the implications of these views. Mocked, sometimes by other prisoners as well as the guards, they maintained their faith, supported by the complex underground network set up within the camps, and even, on occasions, between different camps.
Bruno Bettleheim, in his study of the camps claims that according to classic psychoanalytical theory the Witnesses should have been the first to fall apart under stress, losing their delusions and certainties amidst the horrors of their new life. In fact, as Bettleheim and others have noted, they survived remarkably well, appearing protected against the camp experiences that broke other prisoners. Witnesses indeed had special aids to survival lacking to all other groups with the exception of the dedicated and convinced Communists. They had a supportive network, a conviction of being right, of having had their experiences of suffering foretold and, most of all, the sense of belonging to a chosen and esoteric group with its own world-view. This world-view could be held intact amidst the brutal realities of camp life and thus Witnesses had what later analysers of survival in camps have identified as essential, an ability to interpret and make sense of what they saw around them and what they suffered themselves. What they experienced had the effect of reinforcing their views, whereas for ethers it had the totally destructive and disorientating effect of throwing into question all they had ever learnt or believed about themselves and life. The Witness' view of the meaning of his life was held intact in the middle of the violence, humiliation and reversion to [171] animal behaviour which is known to have had such terrible effects on others. The Witness who remained alive, even if he suffered, was in God's hands. The Witness who died knew that there was a purpose in his death which became not empty and meaningless, but a martyrdom.
Witnesses in the camps behaved, as far as they were able, as model prisoners, accepting orders and willingly obeying authority. In this they were criticised by other inmates, but in this lay a measure of their survival. They remained detached, as obedient in the world of the camps as in outside society. They were God's people and nothing could change that.
Members of this self contained, believing group were impervious to many of the spiritual, moral and psychological crises experienced by other prisoners, although they were by no means spared their share of physical and emotional suffering. Witnesses, on the whole, unless they were tortured to the stage beyond which human judgement fails, were not confused, were never vacillating. They knew what was happening to them and they believed they knew why it was happening; death held no fear. Their uncompromising and unflinching attitude had brought them into the camps but it was this that sustained them, once there. The rigidity of their belief, their self-contained world-view explains an emotional and psychological strength which later scholars have found surprising in a group from a generally low socio-economic and educational background. Prisoners from this kind of background were found normally to suffer great disorientation in prisons and camps, since they wore unable to articulate their feelings or to make any intellectual sense of their situation. Witnesses were not like that, they came Out of the camps still seeking converts, handing round cards to their newly released and confused fellow prisoners. The cards gave a simple hope: 'There is [172] a God; there is a purpose to all of this'. They continued to make converts.
The Nazi State and the New Religions: Five Case Studies in Non-Conformity: A Triumph of the Will: The Jehovah's Witnesses
The book Crystal Night: 9-10 November 1938, reports that 300-400 Witness inmates in Buchenwald shared their bread rations with some of the 2,250 Jews brought to the camp in 1938. One Buchenwald survivor told how Witnesses gave their bread to Jewish prisoners and went without food themselves for up to four days.
Bruno Bettelheim observed that the Witnesses "were the only group of prisoners who never abused or mistreated other prisoners" and were "exemplary comrades, helpful, correct, dependable." The Witnesses were known for sharing their Bible message with other prisoners. "Though the gentile prisoners were forbidden to talk to us," said a Jewish woman in Lichtenburg, "these women never observed this regulation. They prayed for us as if we belonged to their family, and begged us to hold out." BBC reporter Bjrn Hallstrom said that in Buchenwald, Witnesses were punished for eight days because they "had not avoided the forbidden paths between the Jewish blocks."
Frustrated by the Witnesses' persistent resistance, the SS regularly announced in Sachsenhausen that prisoners caught talking to Witnesses would receive 25 strokes. Survivor Max Liebster recalls that the SS there isolated the Witnesses and declared their barracks off limits to other prisoners. In Melk, Polish survivor Joseph Kempler says he saw "a camp within a camp" and was told that the SS kept the "purple triangles" in it, dangerous prisoners because they taught people the Bible.
Capitulation, not annihilation, seems to have been the Nazi goal for the Witnesses, despite the fact that Hitler had declared about them in 1934, "This brood will be exterminated!" The Gestapo and SS applied the usual torture methods, and in the process hundreds of Witnesses died. But a clue as to the Nazi aim of breaking Witness resolve is found in a remarkable document offered repeatedly to Witness prisoners a renunciation of their faith and a pledge of loyalty to the fatherland. In exchange for a signature, a Witness could walk away free from camp or prison. Dr. Detlef Garbe, author of an exhaustive volume on the Witnesses, estimates that of the 10,000 Witnesses imprisoned during the Nazi period, there were only a few dozen cases of individuals who signed the so-called Declaration and gained release.
As an intimidation tactic, the SS staged several showcase executions. Heinrich Himmler ordered August Dickmann, a 29-year-old German Witness, shot by firing squad at Sachsenhausen on September 15, 1939. The New York Times named Dickmann as the first conscientious objector of the war to be executed by the Nazis. The entire camp, including Dickmann's brother Heinrich and about 400 other Witnesses, had to watch. The commandant threatened the Witness inmates with a similar fate unless they signed the Declaration. Not one Witness yielded, but the threat was not carried out.
In Ravensbruck, 400 Witness women refused to sew ammunition pockets. Brutal punishment resulted. Yet fellow prisoner Genevieve de Gaulle, niece of Charles de Gaulle, said of the Witnesses: "Ultimately, these women, who appeared to be so weak and worn out, were stronger than the SS. . . . It was their willpower that no one could beat."
Eugen Kogon's famous work The Theory and Practice of Hell states, "One cannot escape the impression that, psychologically speaking, the SS was never quite equal to the challenge offered them by Jehovah's Witnesses."
The Witnesses, who saw themselves as part of the universal struggle of good against evil, sought to conquer the scourge of Nazism in accord with the principles of their faith. For them, says James Pellechia, producer of an award-winning documentary on the Witness experience, it was "a battle for the right to worship their God, a battle to love their neighbor, and a battle to tell the truth."
Hannah, a children's librarian now living in New Jersey, U.S.A., feels that her chance encounter with the Witnesses helped her to cope with the terrors her family faced before they finally escaped Nazi Germany. "It allowed me to be centered in this situation by having seen and been told not to worry, how there are good people who are there to help," she says. "It impacted on me my whole life."
Purple Triangles: A Story of Spiritual Resistance
Himmler often used the "fanatical faith" of Jehovah's Witnesses as an example to his own SS troops. In his view, SS men had to have the same "unshakable faith" in the National Socialist ideal and in Adolf Hitler that the Witnesses had in Jehovah.
Jehovah’s Witnesses - Holocaust Teacher Resource Center
A few more relevant links.
Holocaust Encyclopedia | United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Jehovah's Witnesses and the Holocaust introduction
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/1998/6/1/article_01.htm VA JOSEFSSON
http://www.watchtower.org/library/w/2003/3/1/article_02.htm They Triumphed
Over Persecution
After years of trying to break Jehovah's Witnesses, even someone like Himmler saw that we have an unshakable or unbreakable faith. The inner peace and faith of the vast majority of Jehovah's Witnesses remained intact and unbroken in harmony with what Paul stated at Romans 8:35-39. "Who will separate us from the love of the Christ? Will tribulation or distress or persecution or hunger or nakedness or danger or sword? Just as it is written: "For your sake we are being put to death all day long, we have been accounted as sheep for slaughtering." To the contrary, in all these things we are coming off completely victorious through him that loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life nor angels nor governments nor things now here nor things to come nor powers nor height nor depth nor any other creation will be able to separate us from God's love that is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
As inspiring as the courageous moral stand taken by Jehovah's Witnesses against the Nazis was, they were alone. All other religious organizations present in Germany at the time, compromised with the Nazis and supported them. Rather than taking the moral stand they should have, they curried favor with Nazis and actively supported them, even fighting and dying in support of the Nazi government.
If you would like to debate whether Atheists and non-Judeo-Christians can have a sense of inner peace just as strong as the peace Judeao-Christians draw from their faith in God, then please provide evidence to back up your claims.
I just have and the evidence is clear that the True followers of Jesus Christ, Jehovah's Witnesses, have an unbreakable inner peace and that no one else has anything like it. In the camps they were a solitary island of peace, surrounded by a raging storm of violence and death. There wasn't any other place of peace, they were alone in the storm.
I wish I could say that persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses was fortunately ancient history, but it is not and has continued right down to today. Jehovah's Witnesses still maintain the same stand today as they did then, and remain the only island of real peace.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 6:20 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 1:35 PM wmscott has replied

wmscott
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 580
From: Sussex, WI USA
Joined: 12-19-2001


Message 53 of 300 (223675)
07-13-2005 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Rahvin
07-11-2005 7:01 PM


Re: Reality-the quality or state of being real.
Dear Rahvin;
To say that your religion's interpretation is the only possible correct one without anything to back it up is awfully arrogant.
I use the whole Bible back up my claim, I know that doesn't cut any ice with an atheist, but with christians it is the final authority. Everything Jehovah's Witnesses believe is directly supported by scripture. While there are many interpretations there is only one right one, and the way to tell which one is right is that is will agree with the rest of the Bible and no other verses will contradict the correct interpretation.
No, it's not. Norse mythology contains prophesies that were fulfilled in various myths. That doesn't prove that they happened! A book CANNOT prove itself! Only EVIDENCE can prove or disprove anything.
For many of the Bible prophecies we have independent historical confirmation of the fulfillment taking place, and that the prophecy was written long in advance. Just one of the many of these is by itself enough to prove God's existence and there are many. You really should consider the evidence, there is enough to disprove atheism a hundred times over. If you only read what agrees with your beliefs, you learn very little and may never see any errors because you are only looking at it from one point of view.
Even in your silly example of The Wheel of Time books, there is one author behind the books, setting everything up so it all works out. Who is doing that for the Bible?
Yes we are wandering off topic a bit, I may start another topic on this later when this one is done and I have time for it. But if you want to talk now, there is always e-mail.
Sincerely Yours; Wm Scott Anderson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Rahvin, posted 07-11-2005 7:01 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by CK, posted 07-14-2005 4:53 AM wmscott has not replied
 Message 60 by Rahvin, posted 07-14-2005 2:03 PM wmscott has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024