Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Categories of Evidence Opposing Noah’s Flood - The Discussion
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 16 (482590)
09-17-2008 2:10 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by primemover
09-17-2008 12:19 AM


Creationists don't see a problem here because they accept the possibility of miracles (which to me is another word for something which we cannot explain due to our current understanding of science).
So, god is tricking all the scientist into not believing in the flood?
What an asshole, no?
I guess I should also note here that I don't necessarily disbelieve the "bare bones" story of Noah... I just find it hard to reconcile some of the details of the Biblical version with certain "accepted scientific facts" that I accept as well.
The point of the flood was to kill all life. If we realize that there could never be enough water to cover the surface of the Earth, then obviously there could never have been a global flood.
Its such a:
quote:
DUH!?
to me that I don't even see why people still try to argue for it.
Well, at least intellectually honest people. People of absolute faith are capable of anything. And that's why I lack respect for them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by primemover, posted 09-17-2008 12:19 AM primemover has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by primemover, posted 09-18-2008 1:29 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024