Categories of Evidence Opposing Noah’s Flood - The Discussion

See Bison at La Brea Tar Pits for some of the reasons why:Tar has to be formed from decomposed organic material (Oil, Tar, Coal similar process). Then this has to capture other animals in a pit where they come year by year over many years.If the animals captured in the tar pits all occurred after the flood then MACROevolution occurred at a rate that puts evolution to shame.You seem to be off to a good start with S1WC in the great debate, but you need to pull some correlations between some of the evidence to make a flip answer for one not work for another, else all you will get are flip answers (as already evidenced).Enjoy.

---

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

And the similarities and differences in the different myths. Creationists are so "taken" with the pervasiveness of flood myths that they don't look at the details.Ones that contradict the noah myth include the norse one (flood is of blood, no animals, hollowed tree trunk, etc.It is not just the evidence that supports a hypothesis that needs to be covered for validity of the hypothesis, but the evidence that contradicts it must also be dealt with.Enjoy

---

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.