Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Someone who admits he knows nothing about geology, asking where the colum came from?
wj
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 64 (25205)
12-02-2002 1:16 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by funkmasterfreaky
12-01-2002 9:51 PM


quote:
Now I do not know hardly anything of dating methods, though i have been reading up on these things slowly. Lacking the knowledge right now i cannot rightly dispute these dating methods. However the assumption that the "ruler" we are using is constant seems shaky to me.
So, your ignorance of a matter qualifies you to make an assessment of the validity of the assumptions made in radiometric dating? So your opinion should be more highly valued than those of scientists who have tested the assumptions? Your view should prevail against those of scientists who have tested radiometric dating against historical volcanic eruptions to assess the validity of the techniques?
You could educate yourself by reading through articles such as Radiometric Dating Does Work and Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective
And, as been pointed out elsewhere, data from supernova spectra show the same rates of radioactive decay as we observe on earth today. Of course, all this would have to be wrong for you to belive in your particular interpretation of a a religious scripture.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 12-01-2002 9:51 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by funkmasterfreaky, posted 12-02-2002 2:02 AM wj has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024