Or rather in this case, baraminology recapitulates development would be the watch phrase. I could not understand when my Grandfather said o r's p but I could make SOME sense of PrO as in snakes it was clear to me that growth and development were TWO different things. SOooo, if your translation into English is correct the answer may lie in biology for/as particulate inheritance claims against Russian biology still failed to envelop Mendel's symbolic difference of the parental and hybrid (not what we have instead which has been a proliferation of genetic exceptions to Mendels laws). As I understand it the current Creationist critique however beyond its positive contribution baraminically still is hooked on negating Greek contributions especially Aristotle's while it may indeed be the physicist that needs to clean house (before a more extended criticsm of Aristotle can be launched in the community) (on the history of atomism)for/therefore this INTERPRETATION of the Bible may remand that the "particle" while not in the "sex"(or rather is so in a division of Aristotle causation causes) IS NOT the DNA but in principle, which is thought of as material instead of Boscovich lack of compenetration for instance. Just a guess. I saw what you meant by Owl vs other Owl etc.
[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 11-07-2003]
™ Version 4.2
