Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just What is (and what is wrong with) Political Correctness?
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1428 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 255 of 302 (342605)
08-23-2006 12:23 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by nator
08-22-2006 11:30 PM


I think the study is completely unable to differentiate between a word being gender-neutral or not and the actual concept of the word having a strong gender-based stereotype. Industrial Man--that's a male, all the way. I don't care HOW you present the concept of Industrial Man, whether it be lexically, pictorially, auditorily--you're going to get a bias because the actual concept has a gender-specific stereotype.
The study TRIED to deal with that issue by using related words (like Industry), but these words evoke absolutely no image of people at all; they are more abstract. They're not good choices to counteract the issue described above.
Better choices of words would contain the word "man" but refer to a concept that is gender-neutral. If there were such a word referring to the more gender-neutral "teacher", that would be great. I can't think of any good examples off the top of my head. But it's pretty clear to me that the study is not well-designed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by nator, posted 08-22-2006 11:30 PM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024