It wasn't me Trixie
. It was my Mr. Hyde side!
I'm not going to get involved in the actual debate. What I wan't to do (as my evil alter ego) was to just summarize and reset the debate.
WT feels that whatever rights he has put forward have not been refuted. I would just like to get clear (as succinctly as possible) what those are. Then others can (as succinctly as possible) state their disagreement with them again.
The question is still outstanding for WT; what precisely is he claiming are the eroded rights?