Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The politics of assassination
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 74 of 150 (237189)
08-26-2005 5:38 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Faith
08-26-2005 3:31 AM


Re: Well, I cannot defend Rev. Robertson, Faith
How on earth does he deserve even a 10th of the vilification that has been heaped on him here in the last couple of days?
I'm not sure what quantification methods you have used, but I will agree that PR does not deserve as much condemnation from his recent comments... than he does for all of his past ignorant and dangerous comments.
Are you honestly giving him a pass for suggesting someone bomb the State Department? Or that people pray to God to incapacitate a SC justice?
What's that about throwing the first stone?
I don't know. How does that fit in with Chavez, the state dept, and the supreme court? They didn't throw stones at PR did they?
Is everybody here so righteous? Sure sounds like most of you think you are.
More so than PR on these particular issues. But "righteous" isn't exactly the right word. "Consistent" would be better, and "Not a dangerous, raving asshole" would be better still.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 3:31 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 8:07 AM Silent H has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5850 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 142 of 150 (237508)
08-26-2005 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by Rahvin
08-26-2005 3:43 PM


Re: Well, I cannot defend Rev. Robertson, Faith
Read the paper, and tell me that genetics have no role in the gender behavior of fruitflies.
I did, and the paper did not show that there was any genetic role in the "gender behavior" of fruit flies.
It showed that genetic alterations could result in physical genital changes, as well as affect the mating behaviors. This was not necessarily a "gender" issue, but one of altering perception and behavior in general.
Studies suggest that the males lose the ability to determine between male and female, and not that they suddenly feel they are female and so like males. They were also no longer capable of performing proper "instinctual" mating rituals.
Those are wholesale cognitive issues, and not merely gender issues.
There is a second follow up thread on the evidence for genetic influence on sexuality in the Coffee House which is still open if you are interested in where the conversation went after it left the first thread.

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Rahvin, posted 08-26-2005 3:43 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024