|
Author
|
Topic: Willowtree's Scientific Evidence against Evolution
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 191 of 299 (81414)
01-28-2004 11:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 190 by wj
01-27-2004 1:50 AM
|
|
^ bump ^
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 190 by wj, posted 01-27-2004 1:50 AM | | wj has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 206 of 299 (82379)
02-02-2004 10:08 PM
|
|
|
willowtree, where is your scientific evidence against evolution? No more nonsense about godsense.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 214 of 299 (82787)
02-03-2004 6:59 PM
|
Reply to: Message 213 by q3psycho
02-03-2004 6:46 PM
|
|
Another troll looking for a feed.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 213 by q3psycho, posted 02-03-2004 6:46 PM | | q3psycho has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
willowtree writes: I did not initiate this round of Bible stuff.
Willowtree, the god sense nonsense is of your own initiation. Now, since it has no scientific validity, how about providing the scientific evidence which you claimed to have which contradicted the theory of evolution?
I believe I should be allowed to briefly respond to Mamuthus and Mark Austin and Crashfrog. Feel free to be as expansive and detailed as you like, provided you can remain on topic and provide scientific evidence rather than philosophical or theological arguments. To other poster, I suggest we ignore the troll activity from psycho.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 230 by q3psycho, posted 02-04-2004 12:12 AM | | wj has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
willowtree writes: When I did post scientific I posted mainstream stuff. (Milton, Behe, Johnson ) And this material was NOT refuted or defeated except for that which I withdrew. I won't even venture into what your concept of "mainstream" is when you cite the above three examples. Nevertheless, what material from your "scientific" sources has not been refute in this thread? Do you have no more "scientific" evidence against evolution. If not, we will dispose of those pieces which you consider have not yet been refuted. O2U.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 235 of 299 (83175)
02-04-2004 9:35 PM
|
|
|
Willowtree What material from your "scientific" sources has not been refuted in this thread? Do you have no more "scientific" evidence against evolution?
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
willowtree writes: The first six questions/points of post #223 from this topic have not been adequately dealt with much less refuted. You're kidding, aren't you? Your "scientific evidence" against the theory of evolution is that a number of questions can't be answered (presumably to your satisfaction)? You seem to be taking the logical fallacy of argument from ignorance to a new height (or depth)!! How does one "refute" a question? Before anyone can respond to your first couple of questions, define "information" in the context of being a property exhibited by DNA.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 256 of 299 (84867)
02-09-2004 10:34 PM
|
Reply to: Message 242 by wj
02-05-2004 10:51 PM
|
|
^ bump ^ A response to message #242 willowtree?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 242 by wj, posted 02-05-2004 10:51 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 263 of 299 (85955)
02-12-2004 11:39 PM
|
|
|
Any chance of seeing any supporting scientific evidence to go with these fantastic fantasies? Or has the concept of providing scientific evidence been completely abandoned?
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 273 of 299 (86530)
02-15-2004 9:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 272 by NosyNed
02-15-2004 9:26 PM
|
|
Re: Pyramidology
Please let's not get sidetracked on fantasies about pryamids and superintelligent ancients. The onus is on willowtree to provide his supposed evidence which contradicts the theory of evolution. His latest "argument" is: how did information increase? I'm still waitingfor willowtree to define information in this context.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 272 by NosyNed, posted 02-15-2004 9:26 PM | | NosyNed has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 274 by NosyNed, posted 02-15-2004 11:51 PM | | wj has not replied |
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
So willowtree, out of that lengthy diatribe, where is your scientific evidence against evolution?
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
Willowtree, it was a very simple question: where is your scientific evidence against evolution? I note that the ball is in your court to detail what is mean by "information" in the DNA context so that further discussion can be held on your agruments from ignorance.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 294 of 299 (88760)
02-26-2004 7:03 AM
|
|
|
I have long foresaken any hope that willowtree will ever provide any of his supposed scientific evidence against evolution. I am happy for the thread to close and initiate a new thread if willowtree makes such assertions in the future.
|
wj
Inactive Member
|
And your definition of information is...?
|
™ Version 4.2