Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Free For All ⇒

NDE

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   NDE
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 86 of 130 (65061)
11-07-2003 8:42 PM 		Reply to: Message 80 by Wise
11-07-2003 8:08 PM

Their's are FALSE. Mine was REAL.
​
I love that Wise can just say things like this with a straight face, like they're true.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Wise, posted 11-07-2003 8:08 PM Wise has not replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 105 of 130 (65451)
11-09-2003 6:45 PM 		Reply to: Message 104 by Wise
11-09-2003 6:25 PM

NOTHING charges particles? You MUST have attended Saint Atheist school of higher learning.
​
You mean the school where we use physics textbooks instead of saying "God did it"? Yup.
​
If you're so smart maybe you can tell us what an uncharged electron would be, and where we could find one.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by Wise, posted 11-09-2003 6:25 PM Wise has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Wise, posted 11-09-2003 7:06 PM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 108 of 130 (65456)
11-09-2003 7:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 107 by Wise
11-09-2003 7:06 PM

Did you even think about answering my question before you posted? I doubt it.
​
Do you read your own links? That researcher isn't proposing a soul. He's proposing that consciousness doesn't require a soul. He's proposing a totally naturalistic model of human consciousness that leaves no room for God. That's fine with me but I don't see how it supports your position.
​
Science REFUSES to acknowledge that man JUST MIGHT...JUST MIGHT....BE MORE than flesh and blood!
​
He's not more. That's not a "refusal to acknowledge." That's an acceptance of the truth.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Wise, posted 11-09-2003 7:06 PM Wise has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Wise, posted 11-09-2003 7:19 PM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 111 of 130 (65470)
11-09-2003 8:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 109 by Wise
11-09-2003 7:19 PM

Perhaps he might be an atheist with an OPEN mind but afraid to call it what it is....A SOUL.
​
A soul is by definition supernatural. He's talking about a purely natural phenomenon. Is this a distinction you're capable of making?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Wise, posted 11-09-2003 7:19 PM Wise has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024