Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religious tolerance and multiculturalism
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 315 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 10 of 77 (622770)
07-06-2011 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Butterflytyrant
07-06-2011 9:55 AM


The hotel has a strict no hat policy and this policy is for all guests, regardless of religion, race, sex etc.
In the old, unenlightened days, wearing a hat was seen as an individual choice; but that was before scientists alerted us to the dangers of passive hat-wearing. In laboratory experiments, beagles exposed to a hat-rich environment were observed to develop bowlers, trilbies, and in extreme cases stetsons.
Further research is needed to determine if the whole world is going mad or if it's just me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Butterflytyrant, posted 07-06-2011 9:55 AM Butterflytyrant has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Butterflytyrant, posted 07-07-2011 6:32 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 315 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 70 of 77 (626753)
07-31-2011 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Butterflytyrant
07-31-2011 7:37 AM


Re: Gone mad!
This is the def of irrationality - Irrational behaviors of individuals include taking offense or becoming angry about a situation that has not yet occurred, expressing emotions exaggeratedly (such as crying hysterically), maintaining unrealistic expectations, engaging in irresponsible conduct such as problem intoxication, disorganization, or extravagance, and falling victim to confidence tricks.
But he did in fact have unrealistic expectations.
He wants, does he not, to advance his agenda? And his excuse for his murders is that he committed them in the hope of so doing. And yet the fact is that his actions will not advance his agenda. Instead, it will associate his agenda with murder and hate and death. His actions will, if they have any effect at all, work against anything he thinks he wants to achieve.
When Panda asked you: "So he chose targets that also hurt his cause?" you replied: "Essentially yes."
So as an example of rationality, it's on a par with McDonald's trying to sell hamburgers by taking out ads saying that they kick puppies to death and then grind them up for hamburger meat. It's asinine.
His expectations that his murders would help his cause are as unrealistic as unrealism can be. And by the definition that you yourself have supplied, that is irrational thinking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Butterflytyrant, posted 07-31-2011 7:37 AM Butterflytyrant has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Butterflytyrant, posted 07-31-2011 8:33 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024