You don't like my answers. What you said is what you said.
I am thinking more about the censorship of creationism in American institutions based on the church/state issue thing.
If creationism can be taught in brit schools in the classes that deal with origins then great.
The people should decide, by the legislature, these matters if there is prohibition or just not both sides.
Yes. If the majority said creationism should not be taught then it shouldn't.
Unless theres some great law demanding all sides.
I bet there ain't.
Your still trying to ban creationism because you or your side has decided its not true.
This is what you keep saying.
Otherwise let the people decide.
Not a few elites at the top.
Why are you afraid of competition in subjects that are only barely able to introduce these subjects to the kids?
Freedom of thought is a better trail to truth then censoring ones opponents.
What other subjects are banned?
Why just the most famous, historical, and popular one that touches on contention.
HMMM.