Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christmas Star Explained
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 251 of 278 (430339)
10-24-2007 6:14 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by Vacate
10-24-2007 7:43 AM


Calculator Anyone?
Thats correct, so may I suggest you refrain from calling it a "belief"? You may lead readers to believe that you actually think I created that as a religion and not pure fiction.
So, when asked what you believe, you claimed it was that frog thing. Now you say it is pure fiction, as we all knew. So are all your answers lies, and fiction, or just ones that require an honest answer??
Previously it was:
Babel Heaven (4400 years ago) --> Mystery Heaven V2 ---> New Jerusalem
We can adjust the chronology to introduce this new Heaven if you wish:
Pre-Babel Heaven --> Babel Heaven --> Heaven Jesus ascended to --> New Jerusalem
But merging the two heavens is unacceptable. I have been led to believe from the onset of this discussion that these are two different Heavens and I am prepared to show this from your posts and mine. I have questioned you on both versions repeatedly and now you are attempting to suggest they are the same thing? How dare you! This discussion could have been finished 5 pages back had you simply said that they are one in the same.
Paul said he met a man one time that made it to the seventh heaven! Add that to your list. Hell, and heaven have different levels! Get out the calculator!!!
You seem to want to declare every part of heaven a new heaven. No. You want to look at the eternal spiritual realm as another heaven, just because it got removed, separated from our world!! No. It is true that there are also changes in heaven, and hell! Like New Jerusalem, is a shiny new change to heaven. But the inhabitants, many of them, lived long before that.
How many levels to heaven, how many parts? Who knows? What part was the level near earth at the time of Babel, who know? But it was part of heaven.
Oh? How many times have you confused a story I made up as something I believe in?
Why? How many times have you told us something you believe in!!!!!?? Get serious.
By the way, if you don't want to be thought of as BELIEVING what you say, why start with "I believe"..??
post 196
you---"I believe it was a small cloud of bluish purple frogs with vampire teeth and a long fuzzy tail. They plan to rule the world by slowly taking over high ranking positions in government, and they eat babies. (hence their proximity to the newborn Jesus)"
If the readers express as much concern as you do I will re-visit the fact that I made it up just in case you all forget.
Yes, we can see you like to do make things up.
I intend to quote each instance where I spoke of these as seperate Heavens
Go ahead! Heaven is a many splendored thing, and a big place. Of course if it was made separate from the realm of men, it is not here any more. But that doesn't mean it isn't where it was separated to!
It may be foolish to assume that all the readers on this board agree with what you are presenting. If you think that using "we" and "us" has any effect on me that would also be a foolish assumption. Please carry on using this new tactic however, I find it quite funny.
I didn't say I assume all agree with me, or any on this board. I said I was not the only one reading this forum. It is read in the plural, as hilarious as that might seem to you.
The issue of what state the spiritual places like heaven and hell are is a topic of interest. I haven't really locked into an opinion yet. Not that it matters much
I think it could matter, however, in regards to hell. The spiritual place in the interior of the earth. If that is in the forever state, or merged, it would explain why the center of the earth may not be hot.
The physical assumptions and instruments we use would not recognize merged matter for what it is. It could get confused, and read it, say, as a liquid, or such. But I suppose that too, is another story.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by Vacate, posted 10-24-2007 7:43 AM Vacate has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 253 of 278 (430407)
10-25-2007 5:27 AM
Reply to: Message 252 by Vacate
10-25-2007 12:38 AM


Re: Vacate Claims Bible Star is whats in the Bible
Yes we do. You defined the Heaven at the time of Babel as being both spiritual and physical (thus fitting the definition of my term semi-solid). You stated that it became spiritual during the time of Peleg making it unattainable to tower builders (thus fitting the definition of my term de-natured)
Elements of it, such as the angels that assumed a physical body. But I think I covered all that in the last post, that man doesn't know the details of heaven. The bible does let us know what heaven will be like in the future, and what it is made of, and how we will be like Jesus, both physical and spiritual.
What I said was that it was separated from the realm of the physical only, where we are. It is no longer here.
No, I suppose it does not. That is why I stated that I no longer see it as a contradiction. I don't wish to draw out the precise attributes of the heaven that Jesus ascended to after his death any more than it already has so I am comfortable with simply calling it spiritual (as I stated within the summary)
Fine, spiritual is a good way to look at heaven;
I simply said "in the garden" because though I suspected you meant the garden of Eden I didn't want to state that and be accused of distorting your position. I will now include "Eden" to stay with your clarification. As for Jesus being around for the start of creation you can add that as another appearance if you wish.
What this has to do with anything heaven knows.
Good, that means I don't need to edit as I said "Not currently in use"
Well, such a nice place likely has some use. Guess you could just say 'you have no idea'
Thats fine also, but we can conclude that it was not semi-solid it nature due to people being unable to walk up mountains and gain eternal life.
No, actually. That is a guess. It need be no more or less of this "semi solid" than it was before. All that is changed, as far as we know, is that we are no longer near it physically.
This was only possible during the time of Babel and was changed as you stated in this thread. It must not share the same attributes because the mountains in your story formed during the time of Babel (or thereabouts) so obviously pre-date the timeframe of the Heaven that Jesus ascended to after his death. It must have been by default spiritual in nature, correct?
Since Babel was on a plain as I pointed out, we don't need to look into the geology of mountains in the area, to see if they were created small mountains, or pushed up continental separation big ones. But whatever happened to earth's mountains, that can't change how heaven was or is. Only your possible access physically to it.
No, I am only using the details that you have provided. If you have other suggestions to add to the list that is fine as long as they do not introduce contradictions. The details I provided on Hell for example are slim simply because our conversation did not include this area.
Since you are getting all your ideas from me, why bother talking to you, unless you race to some form of point???
Yes, I have shown concern that in your story a great misunderstanding has occurred as the result of God not ensuring the details of the "star of Bethlehem" being properly described. If people learn the truth after they die it kind of makes this all a moot point doesn't it?
I think that whoever thought of the idea caught on before they died. I heard it from someone else, and decided it was the best possible fit of evidences and bible. I will admit, I may have spruced it up a bit, and fleshed it out somewhat.
But you didn't get this from the Bible did you? You sorta made this stuff up don't you think?
Try and pay attention. The wheels God flies in, and mobile throne are right there, plain as day in the bible.
The laws of physics had to have been "created" at the time of "creation", so yes I do assume they were "created". Since they have changed I can also say they are not "constant".
Ah, herein, lies your major fundamental error. No, absolutely not. If the universe was not this temporary physical only state, there is no reason to have PO laws at creation! I see it more as an original spiritual and physical combined eternal state universe, with it's forever laws. The separation came, leaving us in this state, with it's laws. Not the created state, or future state at all.
We cannot know how the laws work due to the fact that they have changed in the past and will change again in the future. The study of science relevant to any portion of history becomes impossible as we cannot be sure that these states have not changed.
It is not that our laws changed, the universe changed. Our laws are what we were left with, stop assuming they changed.
Ok, I retract that angels could be to blame, we are left with a visible Heaven or God informing humans of Heavens location and then becomming upset that they tried to reach it.
No/ His concern was for us, that we not reach the spiritual level in a sinful and fallen state. We needed the savior first, that would start the process of changing man's hearts inside, before we get eternal life. Byt, as I dais, I think that the split was already on the way, because of our wickedness, and Babel just happened to be at the right time. It was not the big thing that caused the created universe state change.
And God is not omnipotent (in your story). He did not predict that humans would mess up so he didn't prepare a Heaven in advance that humans could not reach. He needed a variety of laws of physics, changing lifespans, introduction of languages, spreading out of populations, shifting continents and rising mountains all in an attempt to controll his faulty creation. Don't fault me for coming to the conclusion that your God can't many things correct the first time.
Balderdash. We couldn't reach heaven, and did not reach it. He knew that, by the time we could come close, the created state would no longer be here. There were many good reasons to have the created state hang around as long as it did. He was not out to control us, He could have made us robots from the garden. But He gave us free will. There was a bigger plan in play than controlling man. That could be done in a New York minute.
No fault of mine, its the story you have presented. Others however have a much nicer version that provides lasting appeal.
I suppose if you find it appealing to imagine God as dead, missing in action, and unable to get a book to man that was true.
It can't. As such I conclude that the person who wrote this event down misunderstood what had happened. How then can any valid conclusions come about when the writer of the event got the information wrong? What else is incorrect about the event when the writer could not accurately desribe even its most basic components?
See what I mean, you leave the bible as hogwash, and God as nowhere in the picture, with your interpretations.
Twice, when I said that I think the story descibes a star, and when I think that you pulled your story out of your ass.
So. you think that it is a star, knowing that it could not possibly be a star, so you can have God as a nincompoop. OK. Your other moment of truth is accusing those that look at it, and believe it of doing what you were demonstrated to do here with your purple frog belief claim. How anal.
You failed to note however I also said, in the same post
Vacate writes:
I have no support, in case you are wondering. Nothing. (Rainy Season by Stephen King is the basis for my inspiration however)
And you think that helps your case. OK.
So its safe to conclue that from when I posted my story and every post after that mentioned my story that it was in fact a story and not a representation of my religion or something I have stated as fact.
I see. And you expect, what, a pat on the back, and a thank you for wasting our time in not being honest about your beliefs, or dealing with the topic????? Strange.
No no, you mistunderstand. I find it hilarious that you are often posting as if you are several people at once. We get great amusement from this, every one of us. Me, myself, and I included.
There are many readers, so when you pull your absurdities out of your nether regions, it sometimes is appropriate to note that 'we' can see what is going on.
Just as all can see you have no case for the topic.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Vacate, posted 10-25-2007 12:38 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Vacate, posted 10-25-2007 8:19 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 255 of 278 (430529)
10-25-2007 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by Vacate
10-25-2007 8:19 AM


Clarifying Positions
And also the part that was 2-3000 feet above babel that was both physical and spiritual in such a way that people could build a tower too it and gain eternal life. Don't forget that part. Thats really the key element and thats why I called it Version one and used your descriptions of it for the definition. Let me know if you have forgot that part, I can show where you have stated it in this thread and the tower of Babel thread for a refresher if you want.
The could have built up to it, the only question is what would they find when they got there??? The building up is easy, it is physical. We don't know what that spiritual level was like. I gave my opinion, that, had they reached it, they may have gotten eternal life somehow. But, really, we don't know that, do we?? How it would have affected them, or what it was exactly like I don't see why you want to pretend you know? That is not proof it was merged.
Vacate writes:
Jesus lived at least three times in history. In Sodom, in the garden, and during his more well known years.
What it has to "do with anything" is the fact that God, in your story, must provide a savior not once but three times. Sadly, once again, the writers of the bible where caught unawares and the public has remained ignorant until you cleared it all up.
Why you post such foolishness, I don't know. From your demonstrated tendency to try and make the bible, and God look silly (as in the claim you make that the Christmas star was meant to be real, but really never was stuff)I can only guess that is the reason.
Jesus came once as a man, as the messiah. The other acts of His in creating earth, or visiting it with angels were business trips, like angels make here. His Messiah business was where our calendars are set to, as close as possible.
But I do have some idea. I know what information you have provided thus far. It could be said that its "not currently in use for its previous purpose" - does that better describe what you want to say? (In reference to the Paradise beneath the Earth, I hate for you to misinterpret what I am saying again.)
Well, you could admit you don't have a clue. If you want to parrot my guess on that issue, you could say it could still be in use, but not in such a primary role.
Vacate writes:
The results of the discussion have lead me to conclude that Simple has not made contradictory statements regarding the nature of his Heavens being lower than his UFO. He has however managed to created a bumbling godlet unable to make one creation and stick to it. Four Heavens, three Jesus’, shifting laws of physics, and a poorly understood bible have done nothing to show the omnipotence and power that the Christian God is supposed to be.
I will admit, I may have spruced it up a bit, and fleshed it out somewhat.
Once again, this is my point. In your stort the bible writers did not accurately describe the events that took place and mistakenly called the UFO a star. Who inspired them to write the bible and how did a mistake arrise?
Repeating to you that it was not a change IN our laws, but a universe change with different laws doesn't seem to keep you from misrepresenting me. So we must note that you do that on purpose. The ancient bible term star meant many things that were a light in the night. Do some homework, before trying to comment. The mistake is only yours, as always! And you try to blame it on God and the bible as always. Work on that.
I am paying attention, when I said "You sorta made this stuff up don't you think?" I was leaning a lot towards the parts that you "spruced up a bit". Zipping around the universe for the fun of it - Provide a quote from the bible or stop saying I am not paying attention.
Well, I already gave plenty that puts the Almighty in a flying object! It is also known that He has pleasure.
Ps 147:11 - The LORD taketh pleasure in them that fear him, in those that hope in his mercy.
Isa 46:10 - Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
Hec, He even likes us to have pleasure.
Ps 16:11 - Thou wilt shew me the path of life: in thy presence is fulness of joy; at thy right hand there are pleasures for evermore.
Job 22:14 - Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven.
Ps 19:6 - His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.
He gets around, He has pleasure, and wheels!! Any more questions??
Now I see. The laws may have been eternal, I had not considered that. But they still changed in the Universe and will change again in the future. I don't see any change in my original arguement, quibble over the small stuff but I still have a point:
But they were not our laws, they were not our fundamental forces, it was not our light, etc. The created laws changed, yes, and we ARE the change, and soon, they will change back, this is a temporary state. Write that down, it's a good one.
I would now say the the laws of physics are as eternal as God, but now they are not constant (in our universe), but will be constant someday.
That you could say till the cows come home, but not be able to prove it. The laws of physics are laws that apply to this temporary state, physical only universe.
Unknowable...
To science, yes. Of course.
Something sure changed because you insist that we cannot accurately describe what happened in the past because the laws are not the same!
"Our laws are what we are left with", can be changed to "our laws are what we are left with from previous", logically this leads to "previously laws where not the same as the present" and concludes that "our laws have changed from the past". I am not assuming they changed you have said once again that the did.
The created eternal state laws are to govern BOTH the spiritual and physical together. Separating the two, left us in a physical only universe. We were left with these laws. No one says these laws have changed, we are the change. If you want to talk about the spirutal laws, and forever state, why, you would need a whole lot more than science, that, as you know, by design is limited to the present natural!!! In the box. In the fishbowl of those firm, clear and present severe limitations.
And this is the basis for one of my concerns I brought up in the summary. Had he been aware of this concern before the issue presented itself (omnipotence) he could have created/moved Heaven long before he even made earth let alone man! He was only concerned about us after we discovered a loophole in his rules to reach Heaven. (by building a tower to heaven instead of being saved by Jesus)
You seem to assume that spiritual level over Babel was all there was. No. Those guys had a reason to be near, as some even married earth girls. What, you want them to sire little giants, and take off forever??? This was likely a spiritual accommodation for spirits with business on earth. Whatever it was, it was a part of heaven that was just fine to be here as long as it was.
And took it away by first temping easy access to Heaven and then removing it, creating languages, spreading out the populations, and causing the shifting of continents and creation of mountains. Kind of puts a damper on the free will concept.
The wickedness of man needed to be dampened, limited. In fact, the continents separating around then was a nice added insurance policy. If one got real wicked real fast, it would not spread fast. Until these days, of course, as predicted by the bible, we would run to and fro in the end. But, like the days of Babel, He is way ahead of us, and has plans to separate us real good, taking us clear out of the world, till it can be safe to come on back down and rule it forever the right way.
So providing man with the temptation to reach Heaven and then removing Heaven, creating languages, spreading populations, shifting continents and creating mountains is not a form of control?
You could say He provided Cain with temptation to kill Abel. No, He doesn't tempt. Man takes the good purposes of things, like a spiritual level nearby for our good, or a wooden club, and then uses it wickedly. Don't blame God. You seem to love to do that.
So you really are saying that other Christians, the ones who dont share the view you have presented in this thread, believe that God is dead?
No. But if they have a case for the star being something else, they can make it. And we can look at if it leaves God as true, and the bible, or not. Simple.
So you instead conclude that the person who wrote this event down mistinterpreted what had happened. Instead of wondering what else is incorrect about the event you state that it must be a UFO because the writer could not accurately describe the events most basic components.
Wow, its amazing how different your outlook is from mine! Don't worry though, since I don't feel the need for the Bible to be infallible, I don't believe that its Hogwash at all.
Great, maybe it could be something your purple frogs could use as a toilet area??
If God had a bible that misinterpreted something like the ensign of the birth of the messiah, I would save it, in case there was ever a toilet paper shortage.
Read my summary once again. I am dealing with the topic, you simply cannot comprehend for any length of time the words that I am writing. It does not hurt my side as I am capable of providing quotes each time your memory slips.
How have you meaningfully addressed the Christmas star, and the hows and wherefores of why, etc?? Off hand, all I recall is that you made a little statement that you think the bible is wrong, and it was a star.
If you are stuck believing that I would base my religious outlook on a work of fiction by Stephen King merged with the bible you are truly beyond help. Seriously.
Its no matter to me, each time you attempt to imply that I presented a work of fiction as my stated religious beliefs you make yourself out to be more of a fool. Its like you are trying to force me to believe a work of fiction so that you may have some clincher in your arguement.
You hide your lack of belief, or religious beliefs, whatever the case may be. I have found that atheists generally are almost boastful of their atheism. Since you won't tell us, maybe I should guess? I can think of two types that I have noticed some hesitancy to be straight about their true beliefs. But, no... no need to go there. If all you offer stating you believe in it is purple frogs, fine. People can take that for what it is worth. But don't think that leaves you in a position to throw stones at the bible, loved, and believed by millions.
Behold! He is in the garden. Behold! He is in Sodom!
Are you the decieved or the deciever?
Neither. I am the deceiver buster. The new testament was long after Sodom or the garden. It is also clear that Jesus never came as the son of man there. Pathetic.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by Vacate, posted 10-25-2007 8:19 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by Vacate, posted 10-26-2007 1:33 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 261 of 278 (430702)
10-26-2007 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 256 by arachnophilia
10-26-2007 12:58 AM


The Frst Christmas Light !
actually, "newer dogmatic interpretations" are at play. not "older spiritual realities." this is just yet another excuse to read a text however you please, ignore the actual context and content, and claim special spiritual knowledge on your side.
*i* say, i know better than you. the holy spirit told me that the devil is really a UFO.
No, it is pretty clear who God is talking to. Another instance of God talking to satan through a king is in Isa 14.
13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. 14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. 16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. 17 Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. 18 Thou hast defiled thy sanctuaries by the multitude of thine iniquities, by the iniquity of thy traffick; therefore will I bring forth a fire from the midst of thee, it shall devour thee, and I will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that behold thee. 19 All they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any more.
As is is for the one king, so it is for the other ting.
no, clearly, one needs to be insane to understand many of your points. living in the real world seems to be a hinderance. reading the bible -- that'll just get in the way.
Depends if you read it as a spiritually minded man, or a natural man.
no, that's just the problem. you can claim that god and the bible are on your side. they're not. like i have continually pointed out, god specifically says why he has broken the prophecy, and promises to re-fulfill it. this is a matter of the bible -- and making up excuses that it doesn't really mean what it says isn't going to help your case.
Where does He say He broke the prophesy??
no, context matters! it's about the authority of whatever context it's used in. when it's used in babylon, it's babylonian authority. here's, it about JUDAH'S authority. i cant believe that 250 posts later, you still have not understood this very basic point that people have been correcting you on since your OP.
Nonsense. What is to not depart from the land, and people of Judah was something in particular. Not a stick. A sceptre. That was what would stay, the office of God, the rule and presence, etc of God, for a certain time period only, till Jesus came. Period.
"thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me." do i need to break down this whole psalm for you? "the lord is my shepherd." it uses the imagery of a shepherd throughout.
And, WHO was that Shepherd??! God. The rod was a symbol of that office, an ensign. Like the starship is a symbol of God's office, and was a sign at the first Chrismas.
in the original verse, in genesis 49, it is judah being granted authority. the "sceptre" in that verse is judah's authority. not a UFO.
No it is God's office, over Judah. That included a UFO. The mobile throne as clearly described in the bible. His rule and Sceptre did continue till Jesus came, no broken squat.
The hebrew meaning for ensign is this--
" 1. something lifted up, standard, signal, signal pole, ensign, banner, sign, sail
1. standard (as rallying point), signal
2. standard (pole)
3. ensign, signal "
What was lifted up over Shiloh??? The star!! And boy can it sail. It certainly was a signal for the wise men! How much more clear could this stuff be?????
it's pretty clear when you're drawing false connections, and making stuff up, yes.
No, the Hebrew really means that. And the Christmas star really was a sign. And more.
the hebrew? what hebrew, where? in what verse?
As already posted...
" Thy rod and thy staff
shibtecha, thy sceptre, rod, ensign of a tribe, staff of office; for so shebet signifies in Scripture. And thy staff, umishantecha, thy prop or support. "
Psalms 23 - Clarke's Commentary - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
Look, and learn.
that's great. it's been in progress for the last 2,000 years, then. in the meantime, war still happens. including all those inquisition and crusades. so he hasn't exactly succeded yet. and if the reference was to "peace on earth" missing it by 2,000 years does not exactly make the case that it means jesus.
Right, He started by bringing peace to the hearts of men of good will, that come to Jesus. Sorry if you think undoing the evil caused by Adam's sin was a quick fix!! It cost His life, and a few thousand years of hard work, not to mention the thousands of years of prep work, before man was even ready for Jesus to come. But we are on the verge of the second coming, when He will end all wars.
see, this is just the problem. you have an ad-hoc explanation ready for everything. "parked somewhere out of sight" and "cloaking devices" and the identity of god -- you're just introducing more and more material that the authors of the bible didn't include. you're adding to the bible, saying they didn't know the truth. only you do. are you a false prophet, simple? the bible says to stone you.
False, Jesus hid who He really was from His disciples for a while, even after He rose, they thought He was the gardener! Angels are entertained unawares, as the bible puts it. Cloaked, or in disguise, is what this means. This is bible basics 101, and you think it is new material??
you must not get out much. stars disappear every morning. for a year. for ten years. for 100 years. for 1,000 years. for as long as the world has been rotating. surely you have noticed this simple fact of life that the sun rises every morning?
Well, many realize that the star did seem to disappear and reappear.
"for the Matthew text indicates that the star appeared, disappeared, and then reappeared and disappeared sometime later."
Page not found - Reasons to Believe
"The next fact to notice is that the Star of Bethlehem made a sudden appearance. Literally, the Wise Men saw it “rising in the east” (Matt. 2:2). Presumably they had never seen anything like it. Otherwise, why would they have followed it? The star’s sudden emergence is confirmed by King Herod, who “called the Magi secretly and found out from them the exact time the star had appeared” (Matt. 2:7).
The star disappeared just as suddenly as it appeared. This is why the Magi stopped in Jerusalem to ask for directions instead of going straight to Bethlehem. Then the star reappeared! This is the clear implication of verses 9 and 10: “After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed.”"
http://www.reformation21.org/Past_Issues/2006_Issues...
"In support of the comet theory is the implication in the Matthew text that the "star" disappeared for a while before reappearing over Bethlehem. Comets cannot be seen when they pass behind the sun."
The star of Bethlehem: the Christmas star
"These theories all fail to explain how "the star which they had seen in the east, went before them, until it came and stood over where the child was" (Matthew 2:9). The position of a fixed star in the heavens varies at most one degree each day. No fixed star could have so moved before the Magi as to lead them to Bethlehem; neither fixed star nor comet could have disappeared, and reappeared, and stood still. Only a miraculous phenomenon could have been the Star of Bethlehem. it was like the miraculous pillar of fire which stood in the camp by night during Israel's Exodus (Exodus 13:21), or to the "brightness of God" which shone round about the shepherds (Luke 2:9), or to "the light from heaven" which shone around about the stricken Saul (Acts 9:3)."
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Magi
Need more??? This is not a secret, you treat it like I made this stuff up.
the king was "thick as bricks" because he wasn't an astrologer. nor was anyone else in israel. which is why no one noticed a new and significant star. but people from persia would have, because there were alot of astrologically-inclined people there. which is why the king sent astrologers. why persia? as i keep explaining, only persia had reason to care.
An interesting, albeit, unsupportable opinion. There was no limitation saying only men wise about things like stars had to live in Iran. Even though they did have a Jewish girl there, that doesn't mean Iran sent them, or that they all came from Persia.
sure. maybe the ark was hidden safely somewhere. the problem is that it never came back from its hiding place, because it's not in the second temple that ezra built under cyrus the great. and we know that, because it's not in his book. any other story you create is ad-hoc mental masturbation. no one knows where it went, not even you, because it simply disappears from history at that point.
Not at all so. The omission of the fact that it did get into the holy of holies in one bible book is in no way a clincher. Conversely, if there was a holy of holies with no ark in it, symbolizing the very presence of God, that would be documented six ways from Saturday. 'Gee, we still did all the rigmarole ceremonies, without the heart and soul of the temple, because.....' Or at least some records of it being not there. All you have is it simply not being recorded in Ezra. Whoopee do. Why else would God rip open the veil, and take it back?? Shiloh was here, and He was heading for higher ground now.
It would be IMPOSSIBLE for the real presence of God in that ark to BE on earth!!! Jesus is the way to heaven now, and THE link with heaven. Shiloh is here. Any ark found is a replica, or some such, and not at all connected to heaven. If you don't believe me, when the "find" it, call me over, and I'll touch it, even knocky knock on it, and say, 'come out come out, wherever you are' on it, to prove I won't be killed by God, for so doing. It is in heaven as Rev 11:19 says.
for you to even claim that god took the ark when jesus rose from the dead, you would first half to show that the ark was even there. until that point, the default assumption is that it went missing 600 years earlier, around the time it was last documented to be anywhere.
False. as just explained, Jesus assumed that role of link with the Father, nothing on earth else could exist, as such.
and i love how "UFO!" is your go-to explanation.
When it is heaven you are going to, can you think of a better way???
a starship cannot be both far away and close at the same time. that was sort of the point. it was close by for all of jesus's life, but far enough away that no one could see it.
It was seen when it wanted to be. It was like a Christmas light with dimmers. It could shine bright in the sky. It could come down low, and shine a great light on shepherds, no doubt. It could appear or dissapear, yet still be around. What else could do all that, and more????
why don't you work on it. try thinking rationally, for a change. start reading the bible, especially in larger sections. pay attention to context, and meaning, and stop trying to draw arbitrary connections. stop looking for UFOs. stop reading preconceived notions into the book, and just read what's on the page. and quit the ad-hoc imaginative mental gymnastics. all you're doing is belittling the bible, and god.
Why? So, after all that, I could end up not believing it an any real way??? So I could think God does not fulfill prophesy, but it gets broken by man?? So I would think an ark, with the spirit of the Father is hiding in some dank tunnel cave, or someplace, and that Jesus dies in vain?? So I could believe the Christmas star is another fable, as are the flood, Babel, Eden, and etc??? Maybe it is you that need to take stock, and smell the roses.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Shorten display form of one URL, to restore page width to normal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 256 by arachnophilia, posted 10-26-2007 12:58 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 264 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 2:46 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 262 of 278 (430737)
10-26-2007 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by Vacate
10-26-2007 1:33 AM


Power in the Clouds
Because the spiritual level then, if my guess was right, would result in eternal bodies in a way that we are not now aware of, if we reached it. That is not precise, or physical only, as our universe now is. Therefore how could you know, IF it was merged, even, what that was like??? Just because it could have been both, doesn't mean the physical that was together with the spiritual, was physical only state, as you envision. If it was just a spiritual level, perhaps the physical bodies getting up there, and contacting the area directly would have resulted in a reaction of some kind?? Etc. Who knows?? There was a spiritual part of heaven close by, and that it would have somehow resulted in some change that was not good for man.
"...now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.." Gen 11:5
Maybe it was something less than eternal life, but whatever it was, contact with the spiritual was not then a good thing for man.
That is not my postition. Quit attempting to distort what I have clearly said about my position. I think you are trying to make the bible and God look silly, I have demonstrated why I think you have done this and now you are insisting that my summaries of your position somehow become my ideas and its my fault God appears the fool.
Stop denying. You claimed that the Christmas star was a star, and that the bible was plumb wrong. That, far as I can tell, is trying to make God inept, and silly.
This thread, and my purpose here is to analyse your position and see if it justified as a valid stance to take.
Then compare it to the bible for validity, and evidence, not either an unknown belief, or purple frogs.
I will add this to the list of additions you have made that are not supported by a person who reads what is written in the Bible.
Prove it! Many realize that Jesus likely did visit man in the old testament. Not some secret doctrine there. Better just add it to the list of things you offer no counter belief or bible support for. [/qs]
Had old laws, has current laws, will have old laws again. I hope that you all can take note of this.[/qs] Simple, the created state, a temporary state, then the created state returns when we are ready. Elementary.
I did, I looked back at what you have posted and accurately described the position you have taken. Do not accuse me of misrepresentation when its clear that you have said this repeatedly. Again in this post.
But they were not our laws, they were not our fundamental forces, it was not our light, etc. The created laws changed, yes, and we ARE the change, and soon, they will change back, this is a temporary state. Write that down, it's a good one.
... problem with this is that science cannot study and understand the incredible beauty that God created for us. (according to your story, not mine.)
True. All they can do is look at the beauty of the present state. A mere shadow of things to come. So??? It's time someone burst your little bubble there.
I have proved it several times now. This very post has you just saying "The created laws changed" and thats what I have issue with. ...
So? You can't deal in spiritual laws, live with it. All you can play with is the present ones. That is kindergarten stuff, compared to eternal state realities.
One with forsight and compassion would not have stuck a giant neon light above Babel saying "sinners loophole to Heaven located here"
And, what, He would not have allowed decay state atoms, because man would make nuclear bombs, and kill everyone too?? The heaven of the pre split era was close, but still beyond the reach of man. We lived on the cursed ground, if you remember. It was up till the time of Babel, about as hard for man to get to, as Stars in Orion are to fly to today.
If not for the flood, I don't think they even would have all the slime needed to build such a thing.
Hence my postition that your stance is stupid. Why (in your story) did God bother to give us a brain if we are not meant to use it?
Part of using it is not to pretend we can Buzz Lightyear present realities into infinity and beyond.
Why this need to hear my side of the story just to test the validity of yours?
We like to know what you are testing it with. Maybe your tester is a deficient.
Though I initially refused to specify what I felt the bible was saying about the “star of Bethlehem” as I felt it was off topic in a discussion about your story, I later presented a fictional story based on a Stephen King story as an attempt at humor in hopes of it alleviating your need for my alternate story even though it was off topic. It was clearly not a factual account of my faith, belief, or religion and I did specify that it was a baseless story concocted from a modern day fictional horror story.
Right, I think we got all that. What you present by your own admission, is baseless, and clearly not factual. OK. With a pretend statement of belief like that, how would you expect to be believed next time you offer a set of beliefs??
...my poor choice in the use of the word “believe” that I have since quoted, elaborated, and clarified. Its plainly obvious that I do not deny the use of the word, but it is also obvious that you have attempted to use this situation as some form of grounds to accuse me of lying.
OK, so, in addition to your admitted baseless horror tales, you admit to having poor choice. Fine. Most people like honesty.
Misrepresentation is your prime goal on this one issue and you have not one single time shown any effort to change this tactic.
You talk about humor, then get all wound up when your pretend froggie belief story is not presented in a gentle enough way for your liking?? Lighten up. What else am I supposed to hammer back in your side of the court, when that is the only ball you tossed???? Focus.
Further attempts to portray me as a liar due to my mistaken use of the word “belief” will not be addressed..
Ok, so now the froggie belief is not a lie again. Fine. I thought you had said it was baloney.
Right. Four Heavens, three Jesus, a UFO and a petty God with limited powers. Keep on bustin'!
Only as required. There are at least seven heavens, though, as the bible says.
The flying throne is bible described.
And it is very widespread belief that the son was in a few places in the old testament. Hardly news.
Da 7:13 - I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
And I have no idea how you think God in a starship loses powers?? No.
Hec, sounds like it might be there again in that verse?? The clouds of heaven??? Sounds way up there. In this scene, Dad is giving some power to the son. Did you really think I made these things up???
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by Vacate, posted 10-26-2007 1:33 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by Vacate, posted 10-27-2007 8:18 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 263 of 278 (430739)
10-27-2007 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 259 by arachnophilia
10-26-2007 5:01 PM


Re: Clarifying Positions
what i take issue with is the butchering of the bible that goes with this. insisting, in many cases, that the bible just does not offer the whole story. and in several places, that the bible was written by evil coniving jewish conspirators and christ killers, who intentionally left out bits of his story (600 years before the fact), to cover their asses.
Though not addressed to me, it is a false slur about me.
The leaders of Israel of Jesus' day did not write the bible. I already made clear that your obsessing on Ezra not listing it as returned, or whatever is trivial. I do not think that they could have changed actual old scriptures. I would hope so, anyhow.
As I explained, the records that were likely affected were other things, that had to do with the life of Jesus.
i also take issue with the "decoder ring" version of the bible, that we need our extra-special holy spiritTM decoder ring to understand the bible, and if we just merely read the words on the page, as written, we're missing the big picture.
The reality that God reveals to His people, not to others is well established fact. Indisputable. Old, and new testaments.
Lu 10:21 - In that hour Jesus rejoiced in spirit, and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes: even so, Father; for so it seemed good in thy sight.
Dan 12:10 - Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.
Da 10:1 - In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar; and the thing was true, but the time appointed was long: and he understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision.
Mt 13:11 - He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
..and his results disagree with his own premise.
Oh, hec no. I have nothing that remotely disagrees with the bible, or the split.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by arachnophilia, posted 10-26-2007 5:01 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 265 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 2:53 AM simple has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 266 of 278 (430753)
10-27-2007 5:23 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by arachnophilia
10-27-2007 2:46 AM


Grandpa to Grandson
that's ezekiel 28
I did have that reference wrong.
another commonly and easily refuted "devil" passage. just break it apart -- the imagery used is of the cherubim that god placed in eden after adam and eve were exiled. then of the breastplate that aaron wore when inside the tabernacle. then of the ark of the covenant, and the cherubim on top. it's talking about protection, and how the king of tyre was charged by god to protect his kingdom but has instead betrayed it. none of the imagery even remotely fits satan, who was never charged with protecting anything, and (by your account, i'm sure) had already fallen from grace long before the things described here. you are making the devil out to have more authority than he deserves. blasphemy.
sorry. but content and context still matter.
You chose to naturalize the meaning of what is being said. That is an option, but then you miss almost everything that is really going on.
how about if i read it for what it says, instead of what a false prophet like yourself says it says. this "spiritually minded" stuff is just drivel, and you know it. it's an excuse to make up lies about the bible. more blasphemy.
A false natural only minded surface take on what God is saying is virtually worthless. If you try to explain away the spiritual, you have a worthless book. Do you have a fireplace??? It might be cold this winter, at least use it for something of value. Be honest.
actually, the word you're really looking for is "covenant." and according to the bible, it was judah that broke it. god held up his end of the bargain, but mortal man failed. covenants are contracts, and because judah defaulted on their agreement, god was no longer held to his. at least, that's the premise of the the book of jeremiah. god continues to reassure the people in jeremiah 33 that there will always be a king of david on the throne, but the fact of the matter is, that zedekiah was the last davidic king to rule israel.
I looked at that chapter, and find refutation to your whole case.
"Jeremiah 33:15
In those days, and at that time .
In those very selfsame days before spoken of; in those days to come, and which were hastening on; in the fulness of time, agreed on between Jehovah and his Son; the appointed, fixed, determined time: will I cause the Branch of righteousness to grow up unto David;
not Zerubbabel, but the Messiah; who is not only a branch of David's family, and therefore said to grow up unto him, being of his seed, his son, and offspring; but a Branch of righteousness, or a righteous Branch; perfectly righteous in himself, and the author of righteousness unto others; which cannot be said of Zerubbabel, or of any other branch springing from David but the Messiah; and of him the Targum interprets it, paraphrasing it thus,
``the Messiah of righteousness;''
and Kimchi's note is,
``this is the King Messiah;''
and so it is by other Jewish writers interpreted of him: and he shall execute judgment and righteousness in the land;"
!!!
that's nice, but you're still misreading the verse. especially because "sceptre" means "stick." look up the hebrew word used there, shebet. i know you've done it before. do it again. post it again, so everyone can continue to see just how your sources disagree with you.
That's nice. So the stick will not depart from Judah!!! What natural only nonsense. Thanks for that.
how about if i read it for what it says, instead of what a false prophet like yourself says it says. this "spiritually minded" stuff is just drivel, and you know it. it's an excuse to make up lies about the bible. more blasphemy.
Absolutely false. Nothing could be more false than to deny the spirit, without which, there is only death.
Ro 8:6 - For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
Gotcha.
here is paralleled with "ruler's staff." it's a stick. it's about judah's ruling class status.
So the stick would not depart. How absurd. How ridiculously natural minded.
the problem is that we are dealing with the same word. the "rod" in psalm 23 is the "sceptre" in genesis 49. they are the same thing, and mean the same thing.
That is not a problem, it was my point. Thanks for that. The ensign was not a stick. The office and rule was not a stick. The throne of David passed to messiah was not a piece of wood.
you are rather blatantly ignoring what the text actually says. judah ruled israel. this is a matter of biblical fact: david was from the tribe of judah. jesus was from the tribe of judah. each and every king of judah (the country) was from the tribe of judah -- and so was every king of israel (the country). all hebrew kings, in the bible, are from judah. this (genesis 49:10) is the place in the bible that jacob (israel) grants that authority. it's not about a UFO. it's about judah's right to kings. without it, you are effectively denying everything after this in the bible.
Judah died. Remember??? The sceptre that was not taken from his tribe was God's office, not some stupid stick. Get a grip.
great. now, read what you wrote. i'll help: "ensign of a tribe, staff of office." how does that mean "UFO?" it means "a stick that signifies authority."
It means the ruler, God, and whatever signs He gives. The sign of the Christmas star is an example, and that was not a stick. Really. Neither did dead old Judah have squat to do with it personally. Deal with it.
that's great. but that hasn't happened yet.
It is not yet completed of course.
again, stars disappear every morning.
They don't guide men to houses, or reappear on cue, as needed, after disappearing for what is obviously more than the normal day a star is not seen. That is ignorant.
mary from migdal recognized him just fine. you're essentially talking about the biblical account of a "double take." of course they wouldn't have thought it was him at first -- he was dead as a doornail three days earlier. but they very quickly figured out it was him. even "doubting" thomas, so you can't argue it was faith.
Nothing remotely similar to that, by any whacked out stretch of the natural mind.
luke 24:15 And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them. 16 But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.
30 And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. 31 And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.
John 20:14 And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus. 15 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away. 16 Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master.
stars are fixed. the planet rotates. this really isn't hard to understand.
If a star that is fixed moves before you, guiding you to the son of God, planets and stars have nothing, possibly to do with it.
persia. what part of this are you not getting? magi come from persia. you're basically saying the equivalent of "levites don't have to come from israel."
No. That is unknown, and assumed. If wise men traveled, you can't say they all had to start from the same country.
jewish girl? you're talking about esther, queen of persia, born hadassah of israel. are you really that unfamiliar with the bible? and must you be so incredibly disrespectful of it?
Nowhere does it hint that the queen sent wise men to Israel. That is silly.
that's like saying that "just because elvis isn't listed in the book of numbers doesn't mean he wasn't around for the exodus!" yes, actually, it does. numbers is the book that records the people there. ezra is the book that records the reconstruction of the temple. if somebody isn't in numbers -- they weren't there. if something isn't in ezra -- it wasn't there. period.
No. The granddad that was the high priest, as the temple was destroyed was put to death. His grandson was right there, and built the alter, etc. Would they really start the sacrifices without the ark??? Celebrate the feast of tabernacles, etc?? I see no reason to think so.
i think we've hit on the fundamental problem here. for you, "putting god into a box" isn't just an expression. you seem to literally believe that god lives in a box! how peculiar! what a tiny god you must believe in. no wonder he needs a UFO to get around. and your jesus, all he does is steal that golden box. mreley saving the souls of all humanity would be such a worthless, "vain" gesture. still more heresy.
Nope. The ark represented His spirit and presence. It was like a link with heaven.
you are the only person here that is creating a fable around it. the rest of us are quite comfortable with the idea that god manipulated the heavens in such a way that astrologers would get the message about a king in israel. after all, my god creates stars. moving them is not an issue. but it seems to be a big problem for your weak little god and his UFO. how blasphemous can you get?
So He danced a star around, right to the house of Jesus, and no one else recorded it in other countries??? Think about it. Jesus assuming a man's body did not make Him little. If the Father boogies around sometimes in a UFO, that doesn't make Him little.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 2:46 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 6:35 PM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 269 of 278 (430837)
10-27-2007 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 267 by Vacate
10-27-2007 8:18 AM


Slimestone
So you are guessing that people could build a tower to this version of Heaven and attain eternal life, or some such quality. I don't really care if its "something less than eternal life", what is important is that man could interact with it somehow and thereby required God to move it away to prevent them from reaching Heaven and attaining some mysterious quality that your story no longer defines.
I define things by a guess, when it is left unknown, and educated guess. Based on things of a spiritual nature in the rest of the bible. It is known that the spiritual level was nearby, however.
So instead you assert that the writers of the bible could not get the story correct and "as far as you can tell" god is inept and silly. That supports my point.
No, you can't. A star in the ancient world meant almost any little light in the night sky. Period.
My outlook however is that though there was a misunderstanding about the event that took place there is no need to blame God. Since the bible is not an absolute word for word chronicle of events that we should base our reality upon there is no need to deem God as "silly" - we just don't understand Him. (According to my story)
Your story therefore has no reality to God, or the bible. The idea of the bible is a book to understand Him. Take that away, and you got nothing.
I am not making denials, quote me making denials. You are not understanding my position and you are running out of excuses to do so.
Your position comes in little dribbles, so there isn't enough there to make a picture to understand or not. But you deny that the bible is correct in any meaningful way. Just look at this post, for the quotes from you there.
My unknown belief is not up for discussion
Your unknown belief is up for discussion, in that you are hiding it. That fact alone is suspicious.
Its not my story, you prove it. "Many realize that Jesus likely did visit man in the old testament." - Its your story, prove it.
There are oodles and oodles of sites that outline this Christian belief. All I have to do is show it is an accepted position, not that it has to be the only position.
"Careful study of the OT also reveals that Jesus Christ made several bodily appearances, or Christophanies, long before he entered Mary’s womb. One such appearance was in Gen. 18 when Jesus, along with two of his angels, visited Abraham. In v. 3 of that chapter Abraham greets one of the men as “My Lord” (”Adonai” in Hebrew) which is a phrase in scripture used only to refer to God (see Ps. 110:1). Starting in Gen. 18:13, this man is called “the LORD.” Whenever the word LORD appears in scripture with all caps, this identifies God’s name Jehovah or Yahweh. As this chapter ends, two of the men begin a journey to Sodom while Jesus remains behind to tell Abraham that Sodom will be destroyed. Upon learning of Sodom’s upcoming destruction, Abraham intercedes on their behalf to Jesus. In the next chapter the two angels who were with Jesus arrive at Sodom to rescue Lot and his family.
Jesus also made an appearance to Jacob in Gen. 32:24-30 where he wrestled with Jacob all night. Several theologians have said that Jacob was merely having a psychological battle, not a physical one, because of his feeling guilty for taking Esau’s birthright. However, I have never heard of someone having a psychological battle where their hip gets knocked out of joint as Jacob’s did-have you? Since Jacob held his own against Jesus in the wrestling match, he was granted a blessing. His name was changed to Israel, which is proof that this man had to be Jesus. Israel means “he who prevails with God” or “he will rule as God (rules).” Jacob had literally prevailed with God by wrestling with him in the person of Jesus. This was a reflection of Jacob’s spiritual growth in that he could persevere and overcome by faith without cheating as he had done in the past. Jacob realized who he wrestled with in Gen. 32:30 by naming the place Peniel, meaning “the face of God,” knowing he had seen him face to face and lived.
Jesus appeared to Joshua also in Josh. 5:13-15. Joshua was near Jericho when he saw a man with a sword drawn. Immediately Joshua wanted to know if he was friend or foe and he was told by the man that he was captain of the Lord’s host. Upon hearing this, Joshua fell on his face and worshipped him. This man did not stop Joshua from worshipping him as any other servant of the Lord would do (see Acts 10:26; 14:15; Rev. 19:10; 22:9 where servants of God stopped other men from worshipping them). Joshua asked Jesus what his message was and Jesus responded by telling Joshua to take off his shoes because he was on holy ground, which is the same thing he told Moses in Exodus when he appeared to him in a burning bush."
Jesus Christ’s appearances in the Old Testament–pt. 1 – Sun & Shield
The belief Jesus was alive and well, and visiting us in the old testament is basic bread and butter Christian fare.
Right, so why do you keep denying your position and asserting it in the same breath? . Unknowable.
That this universe we know will pass away is well known. That this is a temporary world is almost universally known to believers. What I say is unknown is the precise details of the spiritual kingdom, to PO men.
Why bother, they aren't working right anyhow. (according to your story)
They work fine where they apply, not in the PO fishbowl, we were given fishbowl physics laws that rule here.
Good thing your around to explain it then. Is the Disney reference a requirement or just biblical sources?
It is a popular culture example of a claim that someone could go to infinity and beyond, when they can't get out of the box themselves!
So I conclude that by looking at the present state and making conclusions based upon it leads people to incorrect ideas based on the fact that the laws have changed in the past, left no evidence of the change, and result in man being unable to learn anything due to the shifting of fundamental laws in our universe. Thanks to your God, in your story, we got brains but cannot use them.
You can use them in the fishbowl. Be thankful. Just don't think too highly of your abilities, and thoughts. God's thoughts are way way higher.
From what I know, nuclear bombs do not depend on decay for the reaction to take place. Feel free to show me where I am wrong however, I haven't read much on the subject. (don't just assert that your right, a relevant quote from a reputable site would be wonderful)
"Nuclear fission differs from other forms of radioactive decay in that it can be harnessed and controlled via a chain reaction: free neutrons released by each fission event can trigger yet more events, which in turn release more neutrons and cause more fissions. Chemical isotopes that can sustain a fission chain reaction are called nuclear fuels, and are said to be fissile. The most common nuclear fuels are 235U (the isotope of uranium with an atomic mass of 235 and of use in nuclear reactors, 238) and 239Pu (the isotope of plutonium with an atomic mass of 239). These fuels break apart into a range of chemical elements with atomic masses near 100 (fission products). Most nuclear fuels undergo spontaneous fission only very slowly,"
Nuclear fission - Wikipedia
So, it seems it is more or less speeding up the PO processes of decay. In a universe where there is no decay process as we know, that isn't something that could be sped up, is it??
But the point you missed was that, just because there is something available, no need to use it in a way that is bad.
The God is omnipotent and infinitley powerful so he doesnt need to make four heavens, ufo's, repeating Jesus', and changing laws of physics just to get his creation to work right alternate viewpoint I have suggested could be the "tester" your looking for. Now who do we assign as judge for my "testers" legitimacy and when would you suggest I create a new topic to discuss it?
Are you saying, now, then, that this is your belief???
He made many levels of hell, and heaven. Nothing to do with not being powerful, He is accommodating. Neither is Jesus being alive and well and active make Him more than one Jesus. Neither is there a thing wrong with Ezekiel's mobile throne sighting. Test that, with your little shiny new tester.
No, see we cannot reach the stars of Orion today. Its impossible. The people of Babel however could reach the Heaven of the time, thats why God had to remove it remember? It was only 2-3000 feet up, not light years away.
Well, no, they could not have, because God just wasn't about to dream of letting that happen any more than we can play guitar on the bands of Orion.
Great arguement! Add that to the list of "great things the flood brought to mankind". You really think slime and bricks is a good way to make a tower anyhow? Sounds kind of stupid for people who had superior intelligence.
That was pre split, remember!!??? Focus. What does how we make bricks now with got to do remotely with that!!??? They had plenty of slimestone.
From start to finish, yes I have been honest about the fact that this was not a statement of belief, faith, or religion. Perhaps you could finally let that sink in.
Oh, I got how you admitted yo had poor choice, and also made that stated belief up. Relax.
That was my other mistake I suppose, not spelling shit out to absurd detail so you can grasp an obvious work of fiction.
Not at all, you can't pull one over on me. I was onto you soon as you made the silly claims. I knew you were not telling the truth, if it makes you feel any better.
I will say that I personally find you to be a horrid example of what christanity is supposed to stand for.
No problem. From the quality of your arguments, or lack therof, that is a compliment. Now, if you were brave enough to put your beliefs on the table, as I have, I might pay them a little return compliment there. But you can stay in your safe place, that's OK. Readers will understand what you are doing. Better to stay mellow yellow, I suppose.
Correct, its baloney or "a work of fiction". You accused me of lying that it was not a statement of belief, faith, or religion. I have explained again and again to the point of absurdity that this is not the case. The fact that you still do not get it brings into question why I continue to debate with you. You tactics are low and your comprehension is limited.
OK, so I think we all are starting to get it here. You insist obsessively in hiding your 'true' beliefs. You presented some beliefs, but these were false, by your own admission. You haven't been able to grasp that you fooled no one, but are so convinced you had, you think others have a 'comprehension problem'. OK.
Now, on the topic, I think your 'stated' position' is that you insist the Christmas star was a distant sun, and that the bible, therefore, is hopelessly wrong. You offer no support for why, but have made the claim. Wow. Whoopee do.
It was news to me before I started on this thread. Just for the record, again, I think this makes your God look like a Godlet.
OK, so you had no idea before this thread Jesus was alive and well before He came down as a human baby. OK. I guess this is a clue that you are not familiar with Christian basics. We are narrowing your secret beliefs down a little.
Amazing! I can totally see now how you get UFO's from the bible, crystal clear now that you have shown how Clouds=UFO's.
Well, what I took as a clue there, was that God in that scene, and His son were up in the clouds.
" The Ancient of days
God Almighty; and this is the only place in the sacred writings where God the Father is represented in a human form."
Daniel 7 - Clarke's Commentary - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
This is God, up in the clouds, no??? In a body. The son is also there. Now, was the Father's wheels there???? (UFO of Ezekiel) Let's see.
Oh my goodness, to clinch it, there is the THRONE, plain as day!!!
9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
Surprise surprise. You really thought I made this stuff up????????
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by Vacate, posted 10-27-2007 8:18 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by Vacate, posted 10-27-2007 11:30 PM simple has not replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 270 of 278 (430845)
10-27-2007 9:50 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by arachnophilia
10-27-2007 6:35 PM


no, for something to be "really going on" it has to actually be there in the text, not just something that has been read into it that was not the intentions of the author. you go looking for the devil, and you will find him. everywhere. but it's just your paranoid self-delusion.
The author was God, and His spirit, so to perceive the intentions the spirit is required. Get over it.
nobody is explaining it away. we're arguing against the spiritual non-content.
The wheels are real. The throne is real. The guiding the wise men was real. The star prophesy was real. The fact that you want to neuter the spiritual from the bible only neuters you potential to actually understand it. That is plainly brought out in the bible, I even posted some verses on it.
jeremiah 33 does indeed promise the messiah, which is why i mentioned it. the problem is that we are still faced with reality in which the last king of judah, from the line of david, dies in 586 BC. the person you are saying would fulfill this comes almost 600 years later. but you're still missing the point -- god didn't break anything, judah did. god withdrew his blessing (like it or not) from judah. now, i know this is hard for you, but try to think about the order here. jeremiah promises the messiah because there was no king of judah.
The messiah was promised from the beginning, long before there were kings in Israel, or an Israel. You interpret the sceptre as meaning kings, that is your problem, and leaves you with broken prophesy, a useless bible, and a God missing in action.
so "judah will have kings until the messiah comes" makes no sense. there was no need for the messiah until judah did not have kings.
Complete nonsense and doctrine. Man needed a savior since the fall. Israel was one step on the way there, and it's silly little pip squeak kings, most of whom seemed to be desperately wicked, and idolaters anyhow, had diddley much to do with it. If you miss God's office, you miss the whole thing.
not a stick. it's a word that symbolizes judah's authority to rule. judah's authority will not depart. it's not a UFO!
No, it is a word that symbolizes God's authority, and He is the only one in the bible that ever had a sceptre. His sceptre did remain till after Shiloh came. The Father stuck around till Jesus took over the job.
stars do reappear -- every evening. do you really not understand this? do i have to spell this out for you? the magi observed the night sky, which told then a new king was born to israel. they went to visit the king in jerusalem, DURING THE DAY, but only found herod, who was very confused about the matter not being an astrologer. the pharisees told them to go to bethlehem. during their journey, the star re-appeared in the evening, and it's normal path through the night sky led them to the house.
You think it only took them a day to get to the palace now?? Or are you suggesting they were ecstatic every night for a year and some months, or whatever it took to get there???
Can you demonstrate the normal path of a star leading a pizza delivery boy to your house?? Call up, and instead of an address just say 'follow that star'. Yeah right. Get a grip.
did you not understand the fancy picture i posted? that's what happens when you point a camera at the night sky, and leave the shutter open all night. the stars appear to move, in great circular tracks across the sky. planets make even loopier paths. your point is retarded: stars appear to move.
Of course they slow motion appear to move across the sky. Now, order that pizza, and show us the demo. Remember, I am even allowing you to tell then the city you are in. Work on that.
Message 268 of 269 10-27-2007 03:35 PM
You chose to naturalize the meaning of what is being said. That is an option, but then you miss almost everything that is really going on.
no, for something to be "really going on" it has to actually be there in the text, not just something that has been read into it that was not the intentions of the author. you go looking for the devil, and you will find him. everywhere. but it's just your paranoid self-delusion.
A false natural only minded surface take on what God is saying is virtually worthless. If you try to explain away the spiritual, you have a worthless book. Do you have a fireplace??? It might be cold this winter, at least use it for something of value. Be honest.
i find it odd that barring your crazy made-up stories, you would treat the bible as fire kindling. i assure you, the bible is not worthless if you actually read it for what it is. there is no need to make up stories. it's a good book. there is a lot of spiritual content, and nobody is explaining it away. we're arguing against the spiritual non-content. the stuff you have made up that, in effect, negates the spiritual content that is actually there. instead of reading bits about the holy blessing of a king, you see UFOs. instead of imagery of jewish priests, you see the devil. instead of condemnations of an earthly king who thought he was god, you see an angel that you treat like he might as well be.
I looked at that chapter, and find refutation to your whole case.
Jeremiah 33:15
jeremiah 33 does indeed promise the messiah, which is why i mentioned it. the problem is that we are still faced with reality in which the last king of judah, from the line of david, dies in 586 BC. the person you are saying would fulfill this comes almost 600 years later. but you're still missing the point -- god didn't break anything, judah did. god withdrew his blessing (like it or not) from judah. now, i know this is hard for you, but try to think about the order here. jeremiah promises the messiah because there was no king of judah.
so "judah will have kings until the messiah comes" makes no sense. there was no need for the messiah until judah did not have kings.
That's nice. So the stick will not depart from Judah!!! What natural only nonsense. Thanks for that.
*headdesk*
not a stick. it's a word that symbolizes judah's authority to rule. judah's authority will not depart. it's not a UFO!
Absolutely false. Nothing could be more false than to deny the spirit, without which, there is only death.
Ro 8:6 - For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
Gotcha.
try deuteronomy 13. because, you see, romans chapter 8 is not talking about what you are saying. you are using it (and other quotemined "prooftexts") as an excuse to claim that those who do not agree with your ludicrous mishandling of the bible are outsiders, fooled by god. you turn god into a liar, a devil. the bible says to stone people like you.
That is not a problem, it was my point. Thanks for that. The ensign was not a stick. The office and rule was not a stick. The throne of David passed to messiah was not a piece of wood.
no. it was royalty. how do you really not get this? the word means "a staff signifying leadership." even you agree to that -- it's just that this staff is NOT a UFO! it's not really anything, not even a physical object. the verse only means judah's leadership.
great. now, read what you wrote. i'll help: "ensign of a tribe, staff of office." how does that mean "UFO?" it means "a stick that signifies authority."
It means the ruler, God, and whatever signs He gives. The sign of the Christmas star is an example, and that was not a stick. Really. Neither did dead old Judah have squat to do with it personally. Deal with it.
i can't help you. you don't even want to read the bible honestly. you just want to distort it into nonsense and lies.
again, stars disappear every morning.
They don't guide men to houses, or reappear on cue, as needed, after disappearing for what is obviously more than the normal day a star is not seen. That is ignorant.
stars do reappear -- every evening. do you really not understand this? do i have to spell this out for you? the magi observed the night sky, which told then a new king was born to israel. they went to visit the king in jerusalem, DURING THE DAY, but only found herod, who was very confused about the matter not being an astrologer. the pharisees told them to go to bethlehem. during their journey, the star re-appeared in the evening, and it's normal path through the night sky led them to the house.
stars are fixed. the planet rotates. this really isn't hard to understand.
If a star that is fixed moves before you, guiding you to the son of God, planets and stars have nothing, possibly to do with it.
did you not understand the fancy picture i posted? that's what happens when you point a camera at the night sky, and leave the shutter open all night. the stars appear to move, in great circular tracks across the sky. planets make even loopier paths. your point is retarded: stars appear to move.
mary from migdal recognized him just fine. you're essentially talking about the biblical account of a "double take." of course they wouldn't have thought it was him at first -- he was dead as a doornail three days earlier. but they very quickly figured out it was him. even "doubting" thomas, so you can't argue it was faith.
Nothing remotely similar to that, by any whacked out stretch of the natural mind.
if you saw a dead guy walking around, you wouldn't think it was him at first either. no cloaking devices required.
If it was my best friend, and, in Mary's case, almost like a husband, I think people would recognize them. Yes.
persia was the only country that had any reason to even care about israel, because they had (past tense) a jewish queen. esther had been dead for about 400 years at this point.
That is nonsense. Many countries knew of Israel. But it doesn't say countries sent them. Why make stuff up, and read things into it that aren't there???? Then you accuse others of a comprehension problem, because they never tuned in to your little fantasy trip??
ok, let's try this again. what country do levites come from?
Easy, the US, Britain, Jordan, Argentina, Canada, and etc. Why?? Just like Iranians! They are all over. Traveling is a wonderful thing.
try deuteronomy 13. because, you see, romans chapter 8 is not talking about what you are saying. you are using it (and other quotemined "prooftexts") as an excuse to claim that those who do not agree with your ludicrous mishandling of the bible are outsiders, fooled by god. you turn god into a liar, a devil. the bible says to stone people like you.
Readers, just listen to this guy weird out. Without the spiritual, as the bible says, you just can't get it. Got it??
yes, sacrifices got on just fine without the ark. don't believe me? consult your own ludicrous story. the second temple stood until about 70 AD, when the romans demolished it. sacrifices went for another 40 years after jesus was executed. if they can't do sacrifices without the ark, it must have still been there. take your pick, at least one of your points has to be wrong.
Sure one could. Just sew up the veil, and pretend it is business as usual! The show must go on. After all, not like anyone was going in there to check!!!! That is why, in my opinion, God sent the Romans to stop that show, and will send the Antichrist to stop the sacrifices when they shortly start up again!!!!
It is simply not going to be allowed.
curiously, only the bible records any of this.
My ppoint, exactly, if it was a star in the sense of a distant sun, others would have seen it. Thanks for that.
it sure makes him smaller than a god who moves stars.
Not if you think about it. Not only is He all in all, and the Great Spirit that is in everything, and set the stars in the heavens, He also does it from a starship, at least sometimes. And He is soon coming right here forever to land and live, and base His trips from!! Evermore.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 6:35 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 271 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 10:46 PM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 274 of 278 (430870)
10-28-2007 12:40 AM
Reply to: Message 271 by arachnophilia
10-27-2007 10:46 PM


Ray Scared??
both your premise and your conclusion are faulty. a god who writes in cryptic tomes such that only the select few, or this case, the select one can understand it, is a god of lies. you are painting god to be a liar, someone who says one thing but means another.
Complete nonsense, of course. In the extreme. He gave us the choice to select Him. And His spirit, as a consequence. He made it crystal clear, and simple, in the bible that we could understand, but we NEED his spirit, and help.
It is not God lying, by any natural only minded stretch of the imagination, when He says we need, repeat need, repeat need, repeat need, repeat need, emphasis on need, repeat need to have His spirit, to comprehend. That is something you need to get a handle on pronto. Before you can, repeat can proceed any further. That is how it is. Need I repeat myself here????
i do not want to neuter anything from the bible, and i am quite happy to acknowledge the spiritual importance of it. what i want to "neuter" is the sort of lunacy that you are trying to spread.
So, the spiritual importance of it, means what??? Does it mean that it was written by a spirit, and needs a spirit to unlock it's mysteries?? Or do you use 'spiritual' as some mentally conjured, 'in the head only', bible is a pack of nonsense' way?? Do tell.
again, you are essentially saying that god's presence among the israelites (at times like the exodus) was "physical only." who is neutering the spiritual content of the bible now? you are. why do you suppose that people who are literally following god through the barren wilderness, relying on him for their very daily bread, would be lacking anything spiritually from god?
That is the anti thesis of what I ever suggested. The murmuring Jews in the desert were lacking plenty, obviously. Otherwise some of them would have made it to the promised land! Focus. If they had not belly ached about the manna, and worshiped golden calves, while the cat, Moses, was away, and etc... maybe you could say they had 'arrived' spiritually. No. They were a mess.
the rest of us, who have read the bible, appreciate it a little more. even if it were nothing more than lies, it would be an incredible historical work filled with philosophical arguments and beautiful poetry
That is as shallow a take on the word of Gos as could be imagined. Poetry, and 'philosophical arguments', that claim a messiah was coming, and came, and that the book was inspired of God, etc would be the most heinous, diabolical hoax ever foisted on mankind.
and the fact of the matter, god did abandon the children of judah for a time. he says so himself.
Not His office over them. He did hide His face a few times, and allow them to reap the hell they sowed, but He still had His plan, messiah, and office very very, repeat very much intact. This is evidenced by the sacrifice of His son. God had to let Jesus taste what our death was like, the separation for a small moment, from the Father. Perhaps the Father almost hoped that Jesus , His son, would raise His little pinky, call in the angel air strike, and end man's rule?? Instead, He had to forsake Jesus, apparently, for a moment. All for you. And you come up with this sort of tripe???
there whole books devoted to this kings. there are books whose authorship is attributed to this kings -- in your view, god spoke through these people. your view is utterly disrespectful of the entirety of the bible.
On the contrary, it puts man in his place.
this demonstrably untrue. i quoted in a previous post references to the kings of egypt, babylon, and persia all wielding sceptres as symbols of their power. but you evidently have such a short memory that i will have to post them again.
quote:Est 8:4 Then the king held out the golden sceptre toward Esther. So Esther arose, and stood before the king,
Now, fill us in, was that a king of ISRAEL, that held that sceptre???? You ought to hang your head in shame.
Zec 10:11 And he shall pass through the sea with affliction, and shall smite the waves in the sea, and all the deeps of the river shall dry up: and the pride of Assyria shall be brought down, and the sceptre of Egypt shall depart away.
Worldly kings have offices as well. So???? The office over Judah was...class...Who????
again, god's blessing on israel and judah was anything but constant. read the bible and it will tell you so.
I never said blessing, THAT depends on OBEDIENCE!!! I said office, rule. Get serious.
i'm sorry, what? jesus took over god's job?
In the world of men, of course!!! Jesus IS the way, the truth, and the light, NO man cometh unto the Father, but by Him. Jesus is the only Christmas star around you can follow now.
no, they were happy it did not disappear.
You make it sound like they were a bunch of silly morons, that jumped up and down, and got a mench in the bible itself, every time a new evening came round. Ridiculous.
you're still not getting it. these weren't pizza delivery boys. they were astrologers. why is this so hard to understand? astrologers get information from stars.
OOHH. I see. So, we can tweak the test, and demo, here, to make it real easy for you. Call up some astrology club, and ask them to deliver a telescope to your door. Tell them to follow a star!!! You really must be kidding. That is patently absurd. Get a grip, man.
"almost like a husband" is completely undocumented, da vinci code conspiracy theory quality stuff. it's possible, but there is very little in the text that would make us actually think that. and she did recognize him, very quickly, just not at first.
I was referring to how we Christians are all married to Jesus. I won't get into the good stuff on a non Christian public forum!!
you're still not reading. just because today we all view the world in a judeo-christian-centric fashion doesn't mean that everyone always did. israel is part of our cultural tradition -- but in the first century AD it wasn't part of anyone's tradition.
So, why pretend that countries sent folks there????? Try and focus.
except persia. do you understand this now? "knowing of" and "caring about" are two very different things. only persia would have cared.
Woulda shoulda coulda. Maybe, smaybe, baby. This is your pretend case support????
yes, that magi (persian astrologers) were from persia is making stuff up. but UFOs, that's obvious! come on.
God's wheels are bible basics. Claiming that all the wise men were living in Iran, regardless of where they were born is dreamland.
are you really this obtuse? perhaps i should have stipulated "in the ancient world." today people are very cosmopolitan, and in this country in particular, people come from all over and still retain their cultural identity. but in the ancient world, cultural identity and national identity were much more closely linked. levites were jewish priests -- they came from either judah, or israel. magi were persian priests -- they came from persia.
and besides, "iranian" means "from iran."
If these Magi never traveled, why were they in Jerusalem??? Are you suggesting that ALL who used the silk road, or ships always came back to their countries every time?? If not, then, assuming the Magi are as you think, how is it they were hogtied to Iran?? Why not have one in China, or India?? They see a star, bing and a bang and a boom, they prepare to go somewhere more exciting. So??
you're talking about UFOs. don't forget that. you're also talking about spiritualistic nonsense that runs contrary to what the word of god says. the bible says to stone you, as you are a false prophet advocating that we follow other gods.
Other Gods like the messiah??? Like the Ancient of Days?? Your violent fantasies are noted.
god didn't send the romans. they were already there. the romans controlled judea before jesus was born. didn't you read any of the gospels? herod was a roman-installed king. pontious pilate was a roman governor. the messiah people were expecting was the one that would lead the rebellion against the romans, and many supposed messiahs of the age did or rather tried to. in fact, when things actually came to a head, in 70 ad, and the rebellion actually happened, the jews lost. the temple was destroyed by the romans as punishment, and rome began calling the area "philistia" (or "palestine") to add insult to injury. that title remained in effect until 1948, when the modern state of israel was founded.
seriously, learn your history. some of this is even in the bible.
You seriously suggest here, that the legions sent to punish the rebellious Jews, were all from Israel?? Absurd.
under deuteronomical law, sacrifices can only be performed at the temple. which does not exist. the person who rebuilds the temple will be the messiah, not the anti-christ, and animal sacrifices will no longer be required.
We shall see. I can tell you one thing, Jesus ain't building no temple in old Jerusalem. All you are saying, is that many Jews will embrace the AntiChrist as the messiah!!!! This is news????
er, no, astrologers would have seen it. less astrologically inclined people wouldn't. people who didn't care about israel or had different astrology wouldn't have cared about the israel connection. the hindus actually kept amazingly accurate stellar records around that time, and noted a number of interesting events in the sky.
equally curious is that only one gospel records it. luke does not.
You seem to claim here that the Hindus recorded the Christmas star. Prove it. As for why Luke got the scoop, and was in the loop, God gives us all some light. If we place 4 people together, we will see a particular light in each person's testimony. Not all men have to have access to every point. How drool.
i am not sure why you think anyone would see your point as anything other than pure and unadulterated lunacy. even ray martinez called you a crackpot. do you have any appreciation for what that means on the internet? it's like peter popoff calling you a fraud.
Never heard of the silly guy. If he wants my notice, he can say it himself, and see how far he gets.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 271 by arachnophilia, posted 10-27-2007 10:46 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by arachnophilia, posted 10-28-2007 2:09 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 276 of 278 (431065)
10-29-2007 2:42 AM
Reply to: Message 275 by arachnophilia
10-28-2007 2:09 AM


Taking away your stones
then why doesn't anyone else who believes in him see this nonsense you are coming up with? you are just using this an excuse to perpetuate your imaginative misinterpretations. it's not god, or the holy spirit, it's you, simple. it's all you -- and for you to bring up this sort of crap about it being god implies that nobody else besides you has the spirit of god. you are claiming to be a prophet, and you are a false one. the bible says to stone you.
and yes, ray martinez uses the same excuse for his nonsense, too. and even he thought you were silly for talking about god's spaceship.
Well, never heard of this ray, and your prophet gibberish is insanity. The bible basics of God's wheels, and such, are just something that seem to rub your unbelieving natural take on things the wrong way. Tough. Let me assure you, your threats of stoning me are met with humor. If you met me, you would call me sir. I kid you not.
no. it isn't. it is you making god out to be a liar, be claiming he wrote one thing, but meant another. the bible says to stone you.
OK, so you are welcome to your opinion. I, as anyone here that can read would likely notice, make out God and the bible to be true, unlike you.
the running theme of the old testament is "man betrays god." god can be right there in the garden, and man betrays him. and yes, before any imagined "fall" man was fully capable of betraying god the second he left them alone for even an instant.
No. No idea what you are prattling on about. You are welcome to your opinion.
tell me simple, since you are the only saved person here, blessed with the spirit of god and all the knowledge and righteousness that includes -- do you still sin? come back and try to argue this point when you're perfect in every way. because implying as such just adds to your claim to being false prophet, perfect in the ways of god. the bible says to stone you.
Heaven is full of sinners. So??
Message 275 of 275 10-27-2007 11:09 PM
let's stone simple.
both your premise and your conclusion are faulty. a god who writes in cryptic tomes such that only the select few, or this case, the select one can understand it, is a god of lies. you are painting god to be a liar, someone who says one thing but means another.
Complete nonsense, of course. In the extreme. He gave us the choice to select Him. And His spirit, as a consequence. He made it crystal clear, and simple, in the bible that we could understand, but we NEED his spirit, and help.
then why doesn't anyone else who believes in him see this nonsense you are coming up with? you are just using this an excuse to perpetuate your imaginative misinterpretations. it's not god, or the holy spirit, it's you, simple. it's all you -- and for you to bring up this sort of crap about it being god implies that nobody else besides you has the spirit of god. you are claiming to be a prophet, and you are a false one. the bible says to stone you.
and yes, ray martinez uses the same excuse for his nonsense, too. and even he thought you were silly for talking about god's spaceship.
It is not God lying,
no. it isn't. it is you making god out to be a liar, be claiming he wrote one thing, but meant another. the bible says to stone you.
by any natural only minded stretch of the imagination, when He says we need, repeat need, repeat need, repeat need, repeat need, emphasis on need, repeat need to have His spirit, to comprehend.
god gave us all brains. i'm sorry that you do not feel the need to actually use yours. what the bible says of one needing faith to understand is not a matter of coded messages. it's a matter of the bible speaking of many spiritual truths, philosophical matters, that one might not easily understand without a point of reference. it is not a blank check to interpret any passage you like as being about UFOs and claim it as divine inspiration on your part. you are claiming to be a prophet, and you are false. the bible says to stone you.
That is something you need to get a handle on pronto. Before you can, repeat can proceed any further. That is how it is. Need I repeat myself here????
that is all you have ever done. like a heathen, who thinks his prayers will be heard for his much speaking.
So, the spiritual importance of it, means what??? Does it mean that it was written by a spirit, and needs a spirit to unlock it's mysteries?? Or do you use 'spiritual' as some mentally conjured, 'in the head only', bible is a pack of nonsense' way?? Do tell.
if by "mentally conjured, in the head only, bible is a pack of nonsense" way you mean like you have been doing for this entire thread, no. i do not treat the bible that way. you do. the bible is written in rather black and white hebrew and greek. depending on your translation, it's in fairly clear english. you have to read it for what is on the page first, and meaning is extracted from there on different levels. and much of the spiritual truths in the bible are written rather directly.
again, you are essentially saying that god's presence among the israelites (at times like the exodus) was "physical only." who is neutering the spiritual content of the bible now? you are. why do you suppose that people who are literally following god through the barren wilderness, relying on him for their very daily bread, would be lacking anything spiritually from god?
That is the anti thesis of what I ever suggested. The murmuring Jews in the desert were lacking plenty, obviously. Otherwise some of them would have made it to the promised land! Focus.
with every post you write, i am further convinced that you know nothing about the bible, and are not qualified to utter a single word about it. the "murmuring jews in the desert" conquered the promised land in the book of joshua. yes, after some 40 years of wandering -- but if you hadn't noticed (and i am sure that you have not), the running theme of the old testament is "man betrays god." god can be right there in the garden, and man betrays him. and yes, before any imagined "fall" man was fully capable of betraying god the second he left them alone for even an instant.
If they had not belly ached about the manna, and worshiped golden calves, while the cat, Moses, was away, and etc... maybe you could say they had 'arrived' spiritually. No. They were a mess.
tell me simple, since you are the only saved person here, blessed with the spirit of god and all the knowledge and righteousness that includes -- do you still sin? come back and try to argue this point when you're perfect in every way. because implying as such just adds to your claim to being false prophet, perfect in the ways of god. the bible says to stone you.
the rest of us, who have read the bible, appreciate it a little more. even if it were nothing more than lies, it would be an incredible historical work filled with philosophical arguments and beautiful poetry
That is as shallow a take on the word of Gos as could be imagined. Poetry, and 'philosophical arguments', that claim a messiah was coming, and came, and that the book was inspired of God, etc would be the most heinous, diabolical hoax ever foisted on mankind.
you apparently do not understand "if" statements. you were claiming that without your special tin-foil-hat understanding of the bible, it would be toilet paper and firewood. this makes it all the more clear that you do not understand the true worth of text, but have yourself been fooled by diabolical hoax. you fail to see even the base value of the text as a work of literature, let alone the historical and religious significance of the text. let alone the part that applies to our lives today. instead, you hunt for UFOs and anything you can scramble to piece together to make up for your appraisal of the text as totally worthless. you detract from the bible, and from god. the bible says to stone you.
Stop blathering. If the bible is the pack of fairy tales you make it out to be, any real man ought to have the kahonies to toss the garbage out. God is either God, or He isn't. Stand up, man.
god wished the destruction of mankind? he promised never to do so again. your ad-hoc storytelling is heresy. the bible says to stone you.
Prove it. He simply said that He would not do it with water again. The angels at the ready, watching day and night for Jesus to give the signal, and raise that baby finger were not going to come down with water pistols. Get serious. And come down to end this world they would have.
you, who makes up stories about UFOs, accuse the people who quote the bible of making up tripe. you are detracting from the word of god. the bible says to stone you.
Any time, pal. I mean that.
you make it sound like they were UFO chasers. and no, they were only happy to see it again once herod proved a false lead.
Yes. The followed a UFO, and Herod had no clue. So??
your point was wrong. the word does not mean "god's UFO." it is a staff that signifies tribal leadership. it does not symbolize god's authority, it symbolizes the authority of a king.
False. like the king that held the sceptre you posted, and never admitted was not from Israel. The sceptre was the office of God, and that included kings. But was not limited to them, therefore YOUR claims that God's word is false are exposed as a fraud. You prance around here and many seem to think you are the resident bible expert. Let's hope they see through that lie now. You are a natural only minded rip off.
you are using this as an excuse to belittle entire books of the bible. the bible says to stone you.
Not in any way at all is that true. I believe the bible, you cast it to the ground, and stomp on it as a filthy lie. I am onto you.
no, simple. not astronomy. astrology. astrology is like those horoscopes you read in the newspaper, where you find your sign and it tells you about the day you're going to have. except it was a lot less goofy, and more of a serious religion back in the first century AD. it was the practice of looking to the stars to obtain information. persian astrologers associated certain constellations with the jews, and would be the only ones who would have interpretted the stars to mean that a king had been born to the jews.
Fine. I am going to be lenient on you, and go the extra mile here for you. I will make it real easy. Just call your newspaper astrologer, and ask him or her to find your house, just give them your birth date. Face the facts, man, that can not guide them to your city, or town, and very house. Say uncle.
do you really have nothing to add? is the entirety of your comment the level of discourse on a grade-school playground? persia had reason to care about israel. nobody else did. magi were persian astrologers. there were two empires in the world at the time, rome, and persia. and they didn't come from rome. look, it's persia. this isn't even a debate. they came from persia.
Stop fantasizing. The bible doesn't say countries sent the wise men. That is bull.
because you're making stuff up. you have no reason to assume that persian astrologers came from anywhere other than persia.
Prove that they were Iranian, and came from there. You are pathetically lacking in the slightest proof, or bible for your la la dreams.
understanding what the word "vision" means is bible basics. go back and re-read ezekiel.
If I see something, I use vision. So??? Zeke saw the wheels and throne of God. Now, if you want to claim that was a vision of another time, well, I can allow that. Maybe he saw the Christmas star long before it came???
yes, well, have a fun honeymoon. but we don't want to hear your sexual fantasies about jesus.
He has His gals, I have mine. We are not queer, if that is your insinuation. Neither was Mary.
We shall see. I can tell you one thing, Jesus ain't building no temple in old Jerusalem
new jerusalem. i did not think i had to spell out the book of revelation for you.
Oh, so the temple is in New Jerusalem???
Re 21:22 - And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.
Now, the word temple is also used in Revelations, about heaven, but, according to this commentary, not the temple you refer to.
"and serve him day and night in his temple;
not in any material temple, but in the new Jerusalem, the general assembly and church of the firstborn, the temple of the living God; for in this state there will be no material temple, or place of worship, but God and the Lamb will be the temple thereof, (Revelation 21:22) ;"
Revelation 7 - Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
the jewish expectations for the messiah are directly related to (and probably the basis of) the second coming of christ. compare your "jesus is a space alien" prophecy about the messiah from daniel to the book of revelation.
Any English translation of this claim??? Jews await the second coming now, according to you????
no, i claim that they recorded everything. there are at least a half dozen (astrological!) events in the night sky around the time of the birth of christ, recorded by the hindus. feel free to do some research and find some. one in particular was even recorded on a roman coin, pictured at the beginning of this thread. you want an explanation, you find it, but i am not putting my support behind any one rationalization. they are all better than "UFO!"
Prove it. Show us how a star guides men to a house??? Why talk for nothing, support your claims.
Edited by simple, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by arachnophilia, posted 10-28-2007 2:09 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by arachnophilia, posted 10-29-2007 5:43 AM simple has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Member


Message 278 of 278 (431162)
10-29-2007 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by arachnophilia
10-29-2007 5:43 AM


Run for your lives
er, no, your claims that are tantamount to claiming that you are a prophet, the only true messenger of god's holy word about UFOs, are insanity. that's kind of the point. claiming special knowledge, imparted to you by the heavens, that those with a more rational grounding in reality are not privy to... well, that's actually one of the definitions of "schizophrenia." it's a mental disorder.
Interpreting the bible in a believing spirit may seem like something strange to you. Too bad.
they're not threats. they are reminders that what you are doing is the antithesis of what the bible teaches -- and walking around commanding respect (i would call you sir?) is the primary symptom of this problem.
What I mean there, is, it is easy for you to talk about executing me on the net. In real life, you would not be so brave. Get it??
i'll call you "sir" when you can understand the basic literal meaning of a text.
We need to get beyond a surface reading level. That will keep in in a PO natural only shallow pool. Besides, a star literally meant a little light in the night sky, basically. You have offered nothing to guide us to a house by such a star, or by astrology, or any other way at all. You do violence to the literal text, then ask others to take your contortions as some sort of reality. Pathetic.
certainly not the level of study i have put, let alone the level of study that other members like doctorbill have committed to.
You wasted your time, get a refund. You haven't got a clue on the heart and soul spiritual basics, and you can't proceed an inch aithout that. Seems all you learned to do is doubt it. Your natural only version is the dead zone, the boring zone, as well.
when you've mastered that grade-school skill, i'll call you "sir."
Meanwhile, you have repeatedly called for a ritualistic execution of your opponent here, That is real grown up, ya think??? You don't believe in capitol letters, but want capitol punishment for those that whup your touche in a debate. Sad.
if you claim that spirit of god was not with the people he led through the desert, because they sinned, the same standard will be applied to you.
This means what??? Of course God led the rebellious murmuring Hebrews through the desert. They never got to the promised land, if you read the thing, however, because of it. This is news??? That doesn't mean, of course, that they never made it to heaven. They simply were made examples of, of what not to do. What not to be like. The old testament is like that, you know, that is what is is largely about. Sorry you missed that.
the books of genesis, exodus, numbers, judges, samuel, kings, isaiah, jeremiah... and actually understanding the basic plot elements, themes, and being able to actually construct connections by logical induction. that sort of thing is way over the head of someone who claims "divine knowledge"
If we don't have divine help, we ain't going anywhere understanding the bible. That is basic Christian fare. The bible is divine knowledge. To get it, we need His help. The whole thing is rather divine. Sorry you missed that, natural minded man. But, I suppose it might be a good example for others if they read this stuff.
no, simple, the only one blathering is you. you would not know sense or reason if it ran you over while you were trying to cross the street.
No, that is why I crossed the road, I followed a sense or reason. I suppose a star couldn't even guide you across a road, forget to a house in another city. Smaller lights, like crosswalk signals, can help one get across the road, however. Just like a smaller light than a distant sun, could fly over our heads, and guide us places. Sounds like you have too much pie in the sky to cross the road. There are a lot of roads to cross, to understand the bible. Start soon.
that's just the problem here, simple. you are the one making the bible out to be fairy tales with your UFO nonsense.
The mobile throne is bible. I never made it up. The fact a sun could not fulfill the Christmas star story is not a fairy tale. It is obvious. Others would see a distant sun, and it ain't guiding no one to another city, and house.
much of it has nothing to do with historical matters, or events, but with the contents of the soul -- it is full of poetry, prophecy, cultural proverbs, philosophy. none of this could even be remotely described as "fairy tales" because they're not tales of any kind.
There you have it kids, from the horse's mouth. Years and years of learing, and he sees no reality to the bible. A bunch of non historical, poetry, and la di da fables. Don't let it happen to you. Run for your lives.
for every story that you invent on the spot, you have to prove it.
Understanding scripture is not about proof, any more than science is. It is about comparing scripture with scripture, in balance, with the help of His spirit. The evidence of The Almighty flying is in Ezekiel. The evidence of Him in a body is in Daniel. I gace the links. The evidence of the wonders of the light in the sky over Shiloh, in the bible, demonstrate it was more than natural light. You need to clue in to that. You have really not made any cohesive case for a contrary position. I never saw one anywhere where else either. That is one reason that I say that the Starship Sceptre is the best fir, by far. Both with historical evidences, or lack thereof, and with the bible, six ways from Sunday.
you still have not proposed a good reason why people a thousand miles away saw a UFO in the east, went west, and then followed it to a house without anyone else noticing.
Of course I have. They were in tune with the vibes of the heavens, and knowledge of other things, that allowed them to see the entry of the Starship as an ensign that it was. They headed for where it was headed.
They then asked around, since it seems to many that the star disappeared from view for a while. No one knew squat, and the king was drooling all over them, trying to get them to spy for him, on the new king.
As they left the palace, the Sceptre came down low enough to get their attention, and moved before them, guiding them to the house where the royal family was actually now at. This threw the old fox Herod, off the scent, yet, the news conference heralding Jesus to the bigwigs of Israel was still held. Knowing that the mad demonic king was out to kill His son, the Father led the rich men, laden with treasures, to the pad of His son. They had their getaway money, and the angel came by night, and said get going right that night. God was way ahead of the pack of child killers, and wackos. Of course. The sceptre did not depart till after Shiloh came.
i am no expert, but i am a good deal more educated in the matter than you are. if you disagree -- ask the holy spirit what my signature means. i'll give you a hint: it's in the bible.
You are educated enough to use question marks. OK. I have no idea what it means. Since the name of God was a mystery, maybe something to do with that??? But I know His name, see, I am way more educated than that. It's Jesus.
where was this field of bones? when was it? why the bones? who did they belong to? the problem you will have is that this is a vision. it's symbolic. read on the following verses. the bones symbolize the house of israel, and their return from exile -- they're not real physical objects, or real physical people. it's a strong image given by god to the prophet to make him understand what is to come.
visions are symbolic visual representations. they are like the dreams that joseph analyzed for his captors and for pharoah. they're like jesus's parables.
No!! I'll give you my take on that bit. There are a few fulfillments there, likely. My opinion is that the greatest one refers to the ressurection of the dead, when we will have our physical bodies raised. In this case, an example of a certain area in Israel, likely, is used. Other examples could be where there is not even any bones left, like a death at sea, or such.
The other application, or parable, there, is fairly apparent, no?? Most likely, it would be the only one you have seen.
look, i've broken this down for you as simple as i can. you're just going to have to try harder to figure out why persian astrologers come from persia.
Can you prove that all of them were persian astrologers?? That is your claim. Next, can you show they never travelled to other countries, except for this one time??? Otherwise, how would you know which country they were in when they started their trip this time??? Answer these 2 questions. The thread is almost done.
yes, simple.
quote:Rev 21:3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
That verse refers to New Jerusalem, coming down from above to earth. Not some Jewish temple. You kidding???
the jewish expectations of the messiah and the christian expectations of the second coming are quite similar. one is, in fact, based on the other.
Reaalllly, now?? The Jewish believers expect that Israel will be invaded by the Antichrist? That he will take AWAY the daily sacrifice?? That he will rule in Jerusalem, in the holy place?? That is news to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by arachnophilia, posted 10-29-2007 5:43 AM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024