Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 8 of 304 (320622)
06-11-2006 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by iano
06-11-2006 4:12 PM


Re: Request Admins comment on PEH thread closure
When Jar closed the thread he said if anyone wants to go ahead and try to recruit people, go ahead. If you want to do the background work for EvC Forum to host a debate between Dembski and Dawkins, go right ahead. That's what the Great Debate forum is for.
Please be clear that you don't represent EvC Forum, that you're just proposing it as a neutral and visible venue.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 4:12 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by iano, posted 06-12-2006 8:05 AM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 10 of 304 (320739)
06-12-2006 9:13 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by iano
06-12-2006 8:05 AM


Re: Request Admins comment on PEH thread closure
I think it would be a signficicant challenge for anyone to convince Dembski or Dawkins to debate JAD, but you're free to pursue this. If you're successful we'll make whatever reasonable accomodations prove necessary.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by iano, posted 06-12-2006 8:05 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by iano, posted 06-12-2006 9:49 AM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 55 of 304 (327940)
07-01-2006 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Jazzns
06-30-2006 8:33 PM


Re: AdminBuzsaw Response
Jazzns writes:
I am not asking admins to get into a public debate. I am asking another admin to clarify and support YOUR ruling of what I am and am not allowed to say on this forum about fundamentalism. Right now you are the lone authority coming down on me and I feel that it is NOT impartial.
No moderator is impartial, every moderator runs their own show, and under most circumstances it isn't customary for moderators to seek consensus.
Here's my own opinion. Consider an equivalent statement from the other side, maybe something like this:
"Most evos won't admit that science is a fraud. Some things like evolution are just made up by scientists so that they can convince people to ignore the word of God. Scientists have no integrity because their goal isn't knowledge but deception. Unwilling to admit that there are things science can't study, they engage in an unethical, immoral and totally depraved campaign of deceit and deception whose only goal is to discredit Christianity. They deny God, but judgment day awaits them."
To me this represents valid opinion, and I think it's okay.
Here's an example of the same thing, but more personal and in my opinion not okay:
"You just won't admit that science is a fraud. You people just make up things like evolution so you can convince people to ignore the word of God. You have no integrity because your goal isn't knowledge but deception. Unwilling to admit that there are things science can't study, you engage in an unethical, immoral and totally depraved campaign of deceit and deception whose only goal is to discredit Christianity. You deny God, but judgment day awaits you."
I think the above is over the top and that an admin should bring it to the author's attention.
And then there's a gray area, where something like the above is phrased non-specifically using non-personal language, but there is something in the context or presentation that makes it seem personal nonetheless. Different people, including moderators, will react differently. Some people let things roll off them, others can find offense in even the most innocuous statement. When someone has what you feel is an unwarranted reaction to something you wrote, unless you've suffered grievously as a result, the most reasonable reaction is, "Oh, well, I guess that's just the way he sees it."

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Jazzns, posted 06-30-2006 8:33 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Jazzns, posted 07-01-2006 11:29 AM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 61 of 304 (328263)
07-02-2006 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by Brian
07-02-2006 3:43 AM


Re: Jar's belief thread
You didn't provide a link.
There is no thread in which jar has posted recently that has somewhere around 179 messages.
There is no thread in which jar has posted recently that is closed.
Is this an old thread?
{Note - I think the "179" was a typo, and should have been "279". Anyway, the topic was reopend. - AM}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Brian, posted 07-02-2006 3:43 AM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 07-02-2006 12:00 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 65 of 304 (328280)
07-02-2006 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by AdminNWR
07-02-2006 12:43 PM


Re: I got suspended? Where, when, what for?
I'm thinking of modifying the way suspensions work. The change would be that the clock wouldn't start ticking until the next time the suspendee accesses the site.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by AdminNWR, posted 07-02-2006 12:43 PM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by lfen, posted 07-02-2006 2:37 PM Admin has not replied
 Message 73 by Phat, posted 07-03-2006 8:00 PM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 74 of 304 (328693)
07-03-2006 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Phat
07-03-2006 8:00 PM


Re: Guido: Banned for life?
I could not myself in good conscience recommend restoring Guido's privileges, and EvC Forum is not a department of New Jersey Social Services, which is really what needs to get involved.
Send him email, he also uses Yahoo Messenger.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Phat, posted 07-03-2006 8:00 PM Phat has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 82 of 304 (329006)
07-05-2006 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by deerbreh
07-05-2006 3:15 PM


Re: Proposed New Topic on Fossils
Then the thread should be released to the [forum=-34] forum.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by deerbreh, posted 07-05-2006 3:15 PM deerbreh has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-05-2006 6:10 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 105 of 304 (329411)
07-06-2006 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by AdminFaith
07-06-2006 2:16 PM


Re: Now I am confused.
Hi Faith,
Let me address your concerns and put your mind at rest.
Faith writes:
The cause turns out to be that Faith is suspended for answering all the objections to my contention that the facts are hard to come by. Seems to me the whole lot of you should be suspended if I am.
My actions were in this order:
  1. I read the thread, and while reading suspended two members for Forum Guidelines violations against you, Crashfrog and Mangy Tiger.
  2. I issued a warning about topic drift in Message 39, and I added this:
    Admin writes:
    If you posted a message after this one that is off topic, then please go back and fix it before I see it.
  3. I saw your Message 42 addressing the off-topic issues. I regretted having to take the action, but I could see no way to avoid it given the previous clear warning. You are the only one so far who posted off-topic after the warning.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by AdminFaith, posted 07-06-2006 2:16 PM AdminFaith has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 111 of 304 (329541)
07-07-2006 7:13 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by randman
07-06-2006 5:09 PM


Re: granting full access to JAD
The primary qualification for residence in Showcase is showing persistent and extreme resistance to moderation. That's why there's largely no moderation in the forum.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by randman, posted 07-06-2006 5:09 PM randman has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 120 of 304 (329796)
07-08-2006 4:56 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by nwr
07-08-2006 1:28 AM


Re: granting full access to JAD
To everyone discussing JAD and his recent PEH thread,
I'm replying to nwr because his message is the last in the chain.
As nwr notes, this discussion doesn't seem to be focusing on a moderation issue. The proper place to discuss PEH is in JAD's thread. That thread has reached the 300 message limit and is now closed. If someone would like to pick up the PEH discussion or some related aspect of it, then propose a new thread in PAF and the moderator team will promote it as quickly as is practical. Please specify whether you would like JAD included in the discussion so that in that case we may place the thread in the Showcase forum.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by nwr, posted 07-08-2006 1:28 AM nwr has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 153 of 304 (331840)
07-14-2006 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by mikehager
07-14-2006 5:31 PM


Re: nwr
You might try giving my Message 150 from a recent thread a read. It explains that even legitimate complaints can be difficult to figure out.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by mikehager, posted 07-14-2006 5:31 PM mikehager has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by robinrohan, posted 07-14-2006 10:22 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 161 of 304 (332685)
07-17-2006 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 160 by robinrohan
07-17-2006 8:20 PM


Re: Equivalent to "Just Joking"?
robinrohan writes:
But here's a question to admins. What if the other poster doesn't mind? What if it doesn't bother him?
Hey! Dis is a respectable joint we're runnin' here. Yas wanna insult each other, take it outside!

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by robinrohan, posted 07-17-2006 8:20 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by deerbreh, posted 07-19-2006 3:18 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 170 of 304 (333386)
07-19-2006 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by Cold Foreign Object
07-19-2006 2:42 PM


Re: Ray's ban unfair
Hi Ray,
Those showcased in the Showcase forum are intended to have privileges in these forums:
Showcase
The Book Nook
Links and Information
Practice Makes Perfect
Suggestions and Questions
Announcements
Post of the Month
Proposed New Topics
In The News
That you had privileges for Coffee House was inadvertent, and I fixed this a few days ago. I apologize to you for this mistake that led you to believe you were entitled to Coffee House access.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-19-2006 2:42 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 182 of 304 (334486)
07-23-2006 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 180 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
07-23-2006 8:21 AM


Re: whatever
In reply to Faith, SuperNintendo Chalmers writes:
If you want to point out that something violates rule 10 fine. But keep you opinions about my behavior to yourself.
As a practical matter I have to point out that you can't pick and choose which moderators you will listen to. My suggestion is to discuss any issues you have in this thread.
Another perspective to consider is the advantages of having someone interpreting rule 10 who is so intimately familiar with all its fine nuances.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 07-23-2006 8:21 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 193 of 304 (335095)
07-25-2006 6:27 AM
Reply to: Message 192 by randman
07-24-2006 9:44 PM


Re: AdminMod
randman writes:
Fair enough.....no need to argue jar's position and I hear you on the other points as well.....maybe the thread will move on in a more fruitful direction.
<...kudos...>

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 9:44 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024