Based on this evidence that one could claim science proves God is real because neuroligical pathways are stimulated during religious experience.
You sorely tempt me to say things that will get me suspended.
You are obviously
wrong.
The fact that neurological pathways are stimulated during a religious experience
only proves that the subjects
feel like they are having a religious experience. Religious experiences in experiments of this nature have produced a wide variety of results, including visions of
various deities, as well as nothing at all other than a "feeling."
Here is an article you may find relevant. Note that the subjects had religious experiences related to what they
already believed, up to the atheist having no "visions" at all.
When neurologists test the pathways that represent fear and aggression, and the subjects display abject terror or feelings of extreme violence, does this prove that there is a horrible monster in the room to be afraid of? Of course not! It proves only that the
feeling exists, nothing more.
No, science has not proven Love is real and cannot prove it. Maybe they can claim to prove that a possible fantasy called love is real.
Because love is an emotion, proof that such a feeling exists proves that love exists. Your way of thinking seems to suggest that "love" is an external entity, like a Cupid. Science has proven that there
is an emotion called "love," and have quantified examples of its effect on the brain.
Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.