I guess you must have thought that I was joking the other day, I really CANNOT see your posts, I can see you are replying to me - but your posts appear as blanks to me (well that's actually not quite true - the script turns your message text the same colour as the background).I can post an image if you are a bit too slow to get this. I have no interest at all in debating with you, you are the worst type of creationist, you work via misrepresention and slur. I'll thrash it out with most people but you are just two low for me.(and in case you don't get it - I CANNOT SEE YOUR REPLIES - THEY DO NOT APPEAR - NO POINT ANSWERING).

This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:15 PM

Really - I think my discussion with theliteralist has been good, I think I've been on topic with the comments in the objective morals threads. My recent comments in the pornography thread seem good. I've tried to be helpful to Iano in his new thread.In regards to Randman, it's clear that my conversation with him are unproductive so I've decided it's best to not to engage him. That seems a good and productive attitude for a board member to take.blasphemyI'm not a believer it's impossible for me to do that - if I'm banned for that I would consider it a hate crime and a attack on my non-beliefs and human rights.Next you will be saying I should be banned for using a picture of Jesus as my Avatar! (A man who, all joking aside, seemed a good sort).This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:23 PM

---

And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of he youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of GodSt. Mark chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the bible)

vulgarity?I tend to use Shit in various versions (Horseshit, bullshit etc) but I *think* I tend to stay away from strong words such as fuck,fucking,cunt, wankstain etc. (I can think of one poster in particular who likes to use fucking quite a lot but rather as F**king)Shit is not considered a particularly harsh word in the UK.Do you have more of an objection to me using shitting than fucking?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:45 PM

WHAT!EDIT: I'm going to swop it out - but the mind boggles.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:53 PM

What about my signature? - it's a hotly contested piece of scripture.

Off topic, Plaese do not respond unless it's a suggestion related to moderation

This message has been edited by AdminJar, 08-02-2005 12:01 PM

Can someone switch my Avatar back on? I'll return to my theme of Great brits of the past - I'm sure that Robot Archie should be nice and safe

better welcomeHe got a very nice well off Yaro, me and some others - that's all he should expect. There is no VIP section here even Brenda would have to back her assumptions.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-Aug-2005 05:36 AM

Was he offering support to the creationist viewpoint? He said ID was a religious idea - a certain No,no with the Discovery Insit.I just took it as a general call for standards in education and the teaching of critical thinking skills and giving students the tools to place things in historical context. I don't remember seeing anything in there I would disagree with.Brenda= Queen Betty of England.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-Aug-2005 07:37 AM

SHE SHE SHE SHE.

I was always under the impression that I was suppose to be the poster who was suppose to trying to offend on purpose - i guess I'm losing my edge. Maybe if I start refering to lesbos, homos, fairies and the like I can get it back.(so no I don't think you are).

quote:

---

Sorry deerbreh. Tal's signature should stand if he wants it to. As long as it doesn't violate forum guidelines, i.e. obscenity, profanity, etc. Tal's should be able to post any signature he wants despite of or because it is offensive to some.

---

Well it's agreed then, my new avatar is fine.