I thought it was three days. Maybe it was three days before I was THREATENED with the thread closing? At which point I no longer cared anyway. In either case there was pressure on a Great Debate where I understood there was to be no pressure.

Man you've got to be BLIND not to see the attacks on me and other creationists here.

Off Topic Please do not respond.

This message has been edited by AdminJar, 08-02-2005 11:38 AM

I tend to agree about the vulgarity of Charles Knights' remarks.

vulgarity?I tend to use Shit in various versions (Horseshit, bullshit etc) but I *think* I tend to stay away from strong words such as fuck,fucking,cunt, wankstain etc. (I can think of one poster in particular who likes to use fucking quite a lot but rather as F**king)Shit is not considered a particularly harsh word in the UK.Do you have more of an objection to me using shitting than fucking?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:45 PM

We are getting way outside the purpose of this thread.This is not a debate thread. It is for suggestions and questions related to moderating procedure.Please make any posts in the format of the thread. Be specific. If you have an objection, include links to the message in question.

---

And how about his charming avatar? If not blasphemy then what?

I will assume that is a question related to moderation.What his avatar shows reflects the mind viewing it. I see Jesus comforting a child. What's in YOUR mind.This message has been edited by AdminJar, 08-02-2005 11:51 AM

---

WHAT!EDIT: I'm going to swop it out - but the mind boggles.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 02-Aug-2005 12:53 PM

I see. Chas has become a sentimental follower of Christ. How disingenuous of you.And you managed to miss his temporary "signature" then too?This message has been edited by Faith, 08-02-2005 12:57 PM

What about my signature? - it's a hotly contested piece of scripture.

Off topic, Plaese do not respond unless it's a suggestion related to moderation

This message has been edited by AdminJar, 08-02-2005 12:01 PM

People were trying to ask you if you would continue because they were politly waiting to resume the discussion without polluting the debate.Threatened!? Whatever....

Off Topic. Please do not respond

This message has been edited by AdminJar, 08-02-2005 12:07 PM

---

Organizations worth supporting:
Electronic Frontier Foundation | Defending your rights in the digital world (Protect Privacy and Security)
Home | American Civil Liberties Union (Protect Civil Rights)
AAUP (Protect Higher Learning)

...

Thank you to the Admins for suspending Charles Knight. The idea that he might not have intended offense is, however, laughable. NEVERTHELESS, thank you, that was truly justice.This message has been edited by Faith, 08-02-2005 04:25 PM

If you really want me to post on the Great Debate thread you are going to have to reinstate my privileges in the science fora. Shall we wait until the time comes and you remove the restriction then?If I were not restricted, I was going to post to Arkansas Banana Boy that I've bookmarked it so no need to bump it, and in fact bumping it is an irritating pressure that is not supposed to exist on a Great Debate as I had understood it. It is going to take time to read through that thing again, so SIMMER DOWN. The more pressure you put on me the less interested I am in pursuing it.This message has been edited by Faith, 08-03-2005 04:55 AM

Not really. You have permission to post in the GD forum. How well you preform in the GD may help determine whether or not you should be allowed back into the science forums.