quote:
Originally posted by Lemming:
o.k looks at it this way then if we evolved from apes because we have the same genetic make up we are looking at the apes of today not the apes of 1-2 million years ago if we evolved so did they
Indeed. Part of the difference in our DNA is our evolution, part is theirs. The smallness of the difference is shown to be even more significant by this observation.
quote:
and plus why would a ape suddenly change its life style and jump of of a tree and pick up a tool and start working and evolving into a human if it was already living healthy lives in trees it wouldn't unless something was coming up the trees to hunt them and had similar abilities of the ape so my theory is this the apes 4-5 million years ago evolved into the ape of today and the reason the humans force the apes at that time out the trees and minor evolution change them to what they are today
The start of human evolution seems to coincide with the period when the Rift Valley opened, and the climate and flora changed from forest to open plains. That's why we left the trees - the trees were gone.
[b][quote]i don't belive in the theory of evolution on a large scale [/b][/quote]
Or in punctuation, either....
[b][quote]lets look at something else to support what i am trying to say
Neandertals Early Man became extinct are 28-30000BC now for some reason these was around for a long time before that of modern Humans now this was humans of some sort now if they noticed a danger to there way of life they would try and take out that danger just like the modern human if evolution is true the neandertals would have noticed a change in the ape behavier and would have started killing and hunting apes to protect there way of life long before the modern man came about so why didn't they [/b][/quote]
Could you restate this in English sentences because I honestly don't know what you're trying to say.
[b][quote]reason mans pressence on this planet came about very fast not over a long period of time this puts evolution into doubt
[Karl inserts the paragraph break that might make sense of this....]
(I) also would like to make another theory about the pyramids this time about the way modern man said they was built the pyramids was built by 100.000 men but if you look at the popluation in egypt at the time where would they find 100.000 men a how would they be able to support 100.000 men over quiet some time with food and water theory they wouldn't meaning the pyramids was proberley built by a small number of men over the same period of time lets say 10,000 men with the technology of today has you can now see this supports a theory of a more advanced life form then that of now and even if my theory is totally wrong and the pyramids was built by 100.000 men then they would still be more advanced then today so evolution has been put into doubt twice so could there be devolution at work here because basic if we did evolve at some stage we devolved because its clear to see that early man was clever then we are now also if we evolved over a long period stop us from evolve and made us de-evolve ????[/b][/quote]
What you are trying to say appears to be that you don't understand how a pre-industrial society built the pyramids - is that right? I'm not an expert on Egyptology, so I suggest you research the subject and find out.
[b][quote]there are a bunch of facts that need to be looked at i feel some of you are looking at only half of the facts that are pressent
anyway waiting on a reply[/B][/QUOTE]
No. It'll surprise you to learn that the majority of scientists are intelligent people who have actually dedicated their life's work to answering just these sort of questions. The way some anti-evolutionists speak, you'd imagine that they expect the scientists to turn round and say "Ooooh! I never thought of that! Doh!"