Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Supernatural information supplier
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 201 of 208 (174115)
01-05-2005 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by Loudmouth
01-05-2005 12:57 PM


Re: Adding information
Loudmouth writes:
I have thought about your arguments about "information" and "meaning". I contend that the combination of mutation (change) and selection (ie natural selection) creates information with meaning...Do you consider the hemS gene to be an increase in information...
If we're talking about Shannon information, then I have two comments. First, regarding the amount of information, this is an engineering question with a precise answer. Dshortt's answer can only shed light on how well he understands information theory.
Second, meaning is a separate issue from the engineering issues regarding information - meaning is subjective and has nothing to do with information.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by Loudmouth, posted 01-05-2005 12:57 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by NosyNed, posted 01-05-2005 1:24 PM Percy has replied
 Message 203 by Loudmouth, posted 01-05-2005 1:26 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 205 of 208 (174140)
01-05-2005 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by NosyNed
01-05-2005 1:24 PM


Re: An overstatement?
NosyNed writes:
Percy writes:
... meaning is subjective and has nothing to do with information.
Isn't this a bit of an overstatement. We are, I think, talking specifically about information which the context gives meaning to.
This is from Shannon's paper:
"Frequently the messages have meaning; that is they refer to or are correlated according to some system with certain physical or conceptual entities. These semantic aspects of communication are irrelevant to the engineering problem."
Meaning is an interpretation we ourselves cast upon the information. In Shannon information theory, meaning and information are independent concepts, and Shannon information deals only with the latter.
So when it is asked whether information increased with the addition of the sickle cell anemia allele, if we're talking about Shannon information then that is independent from meaning, which is the expression of that gene in the organism and its interplay with the environment.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by NosyNed, posted 01-05-2005 1:24 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by NosyNed, posted 01-05-2005 3:47 PM Percy has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 206 of 208 (174148)
01-05-2005 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by Loudmouth
01-05-2005 1:26 PM


Re: Adding information
Loudmouth writes:
Dshortt seems to have shied away from Shannon information. I can find it if you like...
Oh, no, no need to find it. I'm quite sure you're correct. Whenever Creationists raise the issue of information they're never talking about Shannon information.
...but he argues (IIRC) that Shannon info is incapable of producing meaning within biology.
And Shannon would agree with him 100%. Shannon's landmark paper says this right up front in paragraph two. I quoted this already when replying to Nosy just now, but here it is again:
"Frequently the messages have meaning; that is they refer to or are correlated according to some system with certain physical or conceptual entities. These semantic aspects of communication are irrelevant to the engineering problem."
Dshortt seems to be looking for dshortt information, a type of information that he alone knows the definition of but is unable to accurately define.
Like probably everyone else here, Dshortt does not possess the ability to develop his own theory of information. And neither does Dembski, if Dshortt is going that route.
I am trying to show that the environment gives mutations an objective "meaning" through selection. This may not be adequate for information theory, but I am hoping it is adequate for the type of information that dshortt is looking for.
I agree with your strategy. My only point was that the question of information increase/decrease is independent from meaning. I'll make this clear through an extremely informal (and extremely invalid for anyone who wants to be picky) illustration. What contains more information, a empty piece of paper or the picture of the periodic table of elements? That's easy, right? Obviously, the periodic table of elements contains far more information. But what if our encoding is a "one if by land, two if by sea" type of system. We agree that if I hold up a blank piece of paper it means open your cipher book to page 10, which contains a whole slew of instructions, while if I hold up the periodic table of elements it means "Please wait."
In other words a ton of meaning can be crammed into a single bit, or there can be billions of bits with no meaning at all. It's up to us to decide.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by Loudmouth, posted 01-05-2005 1:26 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by Loudmouth, posted 01-05-2005 4:36 PM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024