Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Haggard Scandal
AdminOmni
Inactive Member


Message 214 of 302 (361842)
11-05-2006 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 213 by Hyroglyphx
11-05-2006 1:05 PM


ADMIN WARNING
nemesis_juggernaut writes:
Why don't you take them to watch a woman dying of complications from pregnancy?
You've mentioned this specious argument before which can only make me conclude that pregnancy terrifies you. Perhaps you should do yourself a favor and just never procreate.
You are treading very close to the line, nj. I suggest you back off from personally offensive pop-psych analysis and focus on supporting your claim of speciousness.
That line applies to everyone.
Don't respond here. You all know the drill.

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month Forum"

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]
    Trust me.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 213 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-05-2006 1:05 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

    AdminOmni
    Inactive Member


    Message 227 of 302 (361889)
    11-05-2006 3:00 PM
    Reply to: Message 223 by berberry
    11-05-2006 2:50 PM


    ADMIN CAUTION
    As much as I sympathize with your outrage, and find the comparison nemesis-juggernaut used distasteful, he did not direct a personal insult at another member.
    His comments remain inside the ballpark of allowable speech, I think.
    Please don't outbid him with a personal attack, Berberry. I know you have the eloquence to do better.
    Edited by AdminOmni, : No reason given.

    Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month Forum"

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]
    Trust me.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 223 by berberry, posted 11-05-2006 2:50 PM berberry has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 229 by berberry, posted 11-05-2006 3:06 PM AdminOmni has replied

    AdminOmni
    Inactive Member


    Message 231 of 302 (361896)
    11-05-2006 3:10 PM
    Reply to: Message 229 by berberry
    11-05-2006 3:06 PM


    Re: ADMIN CAUTION
    Berberry, please take this discussion where it belongs--in either the Moderation thread or a new topic on the question of speech boundaries.
    I'd be happy to discuss my take on it with you in either venue.
    Edited by AdminOmni, : No reason given.

    Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures

  • Thread Reopen Requests

  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month Forum"

  • "Columnist's Corner" Forum
  • See also Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]
    Trust me.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 229 by berberry, posted 11-05-2006 3:06 PM berberry has not replied

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024