Peanut Gallery

I don't know if anybody feels the same - but I feel that creationist posters on EvC have many common traits, as do the scientists.Being on the scientific side of the divide, I naturally relate to and respect the postings of the scientific heavyweights on the forum.Creationist posts generally seem to me to be rambling, unfocussed, illogical, full of irrelevancies and non-sequiturs.... and above all, it seems impossible to have a discussion that builds to any conclusionThere never really seems to be a meeting of minds between the two communities.What do scientists and creationists think?

.Don't, please!!!!

I'm very impressed by the standard of debate on the abortion thread - good discussion, honest opinions, openness, no grandstanding.

I love RAZDs use of 'curiously...,','fascinatingly....' as a way of deflating creationist posts - though I'd hate to be on the end of it, and sometimes I think RAZD overuses the technique. Edited by Richard Townsend, : No reason given.

Smooth Operator,, an id advocate, is clearly an intelligent and knowledgeable person, but I find him /her so frustrating to deal with because of his / her unwillingness to concede he / she is wrong on any point.* sigh * ... I suppose I should be used to this by now.Edited by Richard Townsend, : No reason given.

Bluejay, I understood you, even if Rahvin didn't!