Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Has evolution been proven ?
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 108 of 141 (98154)
04-06-2004 4:27 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by coffee_addict
04-06-2004 4:22 PM


Re: Proven or not.
Actually, I find quoting from the BIBLE to be more "logical"(in debate) than attempting to find out how economic interests prevent (even involuntarily)good will from having its magnitude.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by coffee_addict, posted 04-06-2004 4:22 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by coffee_addict, posted 04-06-2004 5:02 PM Brad McFall has replied

Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 110 of 141 (98197)
04-06-2004 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by coffee_addict
04-06-2004 5:02 PM


Proven or not here I come.
There was the "problem" of SoulFire's little &. That certainly works in debate where you linked
quote:
Quoting from the bible is hardly a logical argument. For one thing, anyone could argue that it is a circular argument by using the bible as a reference for such a major logical argument such as the existence of God and his role in life.
Why is it a circular argument? First, we
for if the "circularity" comes from man and not GOD then back to Soul Fire.
I dont bite. If you want that again let me know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by coffee_addict, posted 04-06-2004 5:02 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by SoulFire, posted 04-06-2004 10:46 PM Brad McFall has not replied
 Message 113 by coffee_addict, posted 04-06-2004 11:11 PM Brad McFall has replied

Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 125 of 141 (98525)
04-07-2004 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by SoulFire
04-06-2004 11:26 PM


Re: Proven or not.
In high school I, BSM, "invented" just such a materiality, which I called 'the gravitational wave theory of the mind' and got credit in both Physics and Chemistry classes describing this but this post was about you and not me. Gravational solitons were purported by me to interact with neuron lipid side chains in channel proteins to alter inonic flow and served as itermedicay (to soul in your case) without Sheldrakes' so-called "morphic resonance". It was a bit fanciful but offered me acces to onology unparralled by seasoned scientists at Cornell.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by SoulFire, posted 04-06-2004 11:26 PM SoulFire has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by SoulFire, posted 04-07-2004 11:54 PM Brad McFall has not replied

Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 126 of 141 (98527)
04-07-2004 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by coffee_addict
04-05-2004 6:09 PM


The issue of art over science is a CONSEQUENCE of a falire to eat fruit rollups for desert at the evolutionist's high table by DENYING that there is a colorless seqenunce back in the evo theory. There is and to say otherwise as you did remands that my lover will assert rape of me for not knowing the same. This is actually impersonal I do not mean any offense. Yes an artist might better evolutionary theory tommarrow by some insight on connectivity left undone by dull phd collectivities but this will only enlargen the series sequenctionally. Let us all hope in and out for the best. Brad. And Frog it all crashs any way...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by coffee_addict, posted 04-05-2004 6:09 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 127 of 141 (98531)
04-07-2004 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by coffee_addict
04-06-2004 11:11 PM


Re: Proven or not here I come.
I knew the BIBLE was SO because this lover DID read the BIBLE with me and THEN asserted That I raped her when all that she said before we were lovers was that I raped language. That however was clearly "flesh" which neither she nor I can deny no matter the artistic or lack of it on my side differences. This could explain one child for her but not two from me. Logic and an ability to read is all that is needed. I take it that that might have come to pass for Soul Fire.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by coffee_addict, posted 04-06-2004 11:11 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024