EvC Forum: the phylogeographic challenge to creationism

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: the phylogeographic challenge to creationism

Omnivorous

Member

Posts: 3991

From: Adirondackia

Joined: 07-21-2005

Member Rating: 6.9

Normal Thread Display

Message 15 of 298 (262601)
11-22-2005 11:24 PM

Reply to: Message 1 by mick
11-22-2005 5:17 PM

Mick, I'm mightily impressed--and with the only rodent I can tolerate to boot.

If mark had not already nominated, and Yaro seconded, I would do either: but "Thirded!" has a dull, plopping sound...

Remarkable presentation. Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 1 by mick, posted 11-22-2005 5:17 PM		mick has not replied

Omnivorous

Member

Posts: 3991

From: Adirondackia

Joined: 07-21-2005

Member Rating: 6.9

Normal Thread Display

Message 73 of 298 (263640)
11-27-2005 11:05 PM

Reply to: Message 70 by crashfrog
11-27-2005 10:40 PM

Re: A harder easy question

Mick gets exactly what I get. If you think he's agreed with your entirely counterfactual statements about genetic diversity, then you've completely misunderstood his post.

To say that variation means less diversity is to say that up is down, or black is white. It's nonsense. Why can't you see that?

Faith has sealed her mind against anything that contradicts her beliefs.

To maintain that seal, she rejects the very notion of evidence and rewrites history.

Real science did not really get going until Christians began applying the inference of a lawful universe made by a rational God to the study of the physical creation. --Faith

This message is a reply to:
	Message 70 by crashfrog, posted 11-27-2005 10:40 PM		crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 74 by crashfrog, posted 11-27-2005 11:08 PM		Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous

Member

Posts: 3991

From: Adirondackia

Joined: 07-21-2005

Member Rating: 6.9

Normal Thread Display

Message 75 of 298 (263642)
11-27-2005 11:15 PM

Reply to: Message 74 by crashfrog
11-27-2005 11:08 PM

Re: A harder easy question

You are generous, crash. I see no evidence in this thread that Faith understands--or wishes to understand--any evolutionary premise.

Perhaps I'm too cynical. Please pardon the interruption.

Real science did not really get going until Christians began applying the inference of a lawful universe made by a rational God to the study of the physical creation. --Faith

This message is a reply to:
	Message 74 by crashfrog, posted 11-27-2005 11:08 PM		crashfrog has not replied

Omnivorous

Member

Posts: 3991

From: Adirondackia

Joined: 07-21-2005

Member Rating: 6.9

Normal Thread Display

Message 254 of 298 (267059)
12-09-2005 12:10 AM

Reply to: Message 252 by Iblis
12-08-2005 10:56 PM

Mighty ZZaxx

What if we were originally some sort of super-intelligent velociraptor types who got a bunch of uh, retroviruses from chimps, by you know Doin It with them, thinking it would be Safe ("No eggs in this one," said ZZaxx, slapping her hairy thigh)

Shouldn't that be "feathered thigh"? (Or maybe not...after...)

I know that sounds like a quibble, but I really just wanted to see that passage in print again.

Welcome.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 252 by Iblis, posted 12-08-2005 10:56 PM		Iblis has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus), PaulK
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0