Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Macroevolution: Its all around us...
Siguiendo la verdad
Inactive Member


Message 162 of 306 (214542)
06-05-2005 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by EZscience
05-27-2005 4:37 PM


Re: Bogus 'evolution' websites
Could you please take each "bogus" point on the websites and explain why they are bogus?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by EZscience, posted 05-27-2005 4:37 PM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by AdminNosy, posted 06-05-2005 6:22 PM Siguiendo la verdad has replied
 Message 164 by EZscience, posted 06-05-2005 10:22 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied

Siguiendo la verdad
Inactive Member


Message 165 of 306 (214667)
06-06-2005 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by AdminNosy
06-05-2005 6:22 PM


Re: Bogus 'evolution' websites
I was refering to this website.
Missing Link | Answers in Genesis
Could you please pick one point that is "bogus" and explain why?
This message has been edited by Siguiendo la verdad, 06-06-2005 12:57 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by AdminNosy, posted 06-05-2005 6:22 PM AdminNosy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by mick, posted 06-06-2005 1:01 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied
 Message 167 by EZscience, posted 06-06-2005 1:29 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied
 Message 168 by AdminNosy, posted 06-06-2005 1:35 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied

Siguiendo la verdad
Inactive Member


Message 171 of 306 (216253)
06-11-2005 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by NosyNed
06-11-2005 1:48 PM


Re: SlV could refer to creationist sources
Oh, thank you so much, that's the problem, my arguement is out of date. Hahahaha.
Could you please enlighten me to all of the presupposition you make. Particularly, show me where these supposed sources might be found, because, though it is clear that you consider yourself an expert, you continuously make grand sweeping statements without evidence.
So, please, give the specific support to your "updated" arguements or keep them to yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by NosyNed, posted 06-11-2005 1:48 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by NosyNed, posted 06-11-2005 8:38 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied
 Message 175 by EZscience, posted 06-11-2005 10:25 PM Siguiendo la verdad has replied

Siguiendo la verdad
Inactive Member


Message 172 of 306 (216256)
06-11-2005 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by crashfrog
06-11-2005 11:30 AM


Re: Reply to Siguiendo la verdad
crashfrog:
We've determined that certain individuals, both decended from the same organism, are members of two different species. Describing that as "varations within a species" is not accurate; just as describing "black" as "white" is not accurate.
And the creationist would say that no such determination has occured.
So, sorry, but your arguement, though logical, is misapplied.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by crashfrog, posted 06-11-2005 11:30 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by crashfrog, posted 06-11-2005 8:32 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied

Siguiendo la verdad
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 306 (216482)
06-12-2005 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by EZscience
06-11-2005 10:25 PM


Re: SlV could refer to creationist sources
The bible is NOT the only source of truth. Anyone peddling that is surely mistaken.
I've never stated anything about "kind". My point is that creationists look at the same evidence as evolutionists and draw different conclusions.
What biological phenomena has evolutionary theory "anticipated", "predicted" or "explained"?
My basic point is that, unless you are a scientific type, expert in the scientific arena or an actual scientist in the areas that directly deal with evolutionary theory, you would have to take these individuals at their word, just like going to a foreign country and having to trust that what a translator is telling you is actually what's being said.
You understand, that you cannot know everything in life, a lot you must trust the sources, especially if you do not have expertise lending to or directly in the area of knowledge presented to you.
So for the average Joe, (a majority of the population), who is not well versed in evolutionary, creationist or complex scientific findings and study, sees two sides to a great big arguement and consciously or unconsciously must put his faith in one or the other. You can't believe both, because they are mutually exclusive. Either the earth is old or it is young, either human beings were made in the image of God or came from a single cell organism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by EZscience, posted 06-11-2005 10:25 PM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by crashfrog, posted 06-12-2005 9:10 PM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied
 Message 178 by EZscience, posted 06-13-2005 7:58 AM Siguiendo la verdad has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024