"Macro" vs "Micro" genetic "kind" mechanism?

stop using Christian and Creationist as though they were synonymous. It comes up time aftertime in thread after thread.Most Christians have no problems with Evolution, Micro, Macro or anywhere inbetween. Those of us here who are Christian and also support the TOE have as hard a time understanding the mind or thought of the Literalists as you folk do. From Atheism to Zoology, those folk are in a little world of their own.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

No offense taken. Well, no major offense taken. Well, actually, it's Christian to forgive. But I do have to note that this thread, along with so many others dealing with specific parts and mechanisims does appear to be, as is so often the case, the same group of folk talking amongst ourselves.I've often wondered if we should not get together and start our own Creationist site. I have to believe that we could do a far better job than any of the Creationists to date. It would, of course, mean totally sacrificing honesty and morality, but I understand that Dr. Scott takes in something over 1 Million dollars a month.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

[whisper mode on]One Million Dollars a Month. One Million Dollars a Month.[ /whisper mode off] But how about just for the fun of it. We'd need a foul mouthed curmudgeon, a reasonable professorial type, an enthusiatic evangelizer, a sex interest female (remember we only need to do better than Jim Bakker did or we can pick a lumberjack. Who's to know?) and of course, the chorus.Who could fill such positions of weight, might and authority?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

It's really not that unreasonable. According to the site all the canines are descended from an original UNCLEAN kind. So from that shrimp, dogs and pigs are all the result of macroevolution from the original UNCLEAN kind, as were skunks and buzzards and bears.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion