The major thing about the fossil record (and in the biota in general) in favor of evolution is not some orthogenic-like sequences found, but the total absence of a single species that seems totally unrelated with something else - what would not be a problem at all, if species were not product of descendent with modification - such as a walking-carnivorous-tree, aquatic mammals with gills, a mammal polyp, etc.
Any other imaginable origin of species would not explain the patterns of heredity that are observed. If every now and then a new species popped to existance, or a creator(s) were desiging new ones and putting them here sporadicaly (or had put them all once), wouldn't be a reasonable explanation to this pattern. Species could look totally odd from each other.
If a creator or creators were really creative, they'd not need to be so repetitive, almost leading to the exhaustion the theme "tetrapod". Why not a hexapod pegasus, a gryphon, or a dragon? Could not he/they do any of that, or simply did not want to?
If the first suposition is correct, it implies a lot in the common concept of the majority of proposed creators concepts I know; if is the second which is right, is at least a bit... disappointing... all the variation that is theoretically possible, and the guy(s) do exactly what we would expect if the restriction were the restrictions of heredity mechanisms? Why? o_O